The Firing Line Forums hypothetical math question
 Forum Rules Firearms Safety Firearms Photos Links Library Lost Password Email Changes
 Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 28, 2006, 04:34 PM #1 joneb Senior Member   Join Date: December 10, 2005 Location: Central , OR Posts: 1,822 hypothetical math question if you had to take a shot at a bad guy running all out would you need to lead your target? you are 60 ft away from the b.g. he is running perpendicular to you, and say he covers 40 yrds in 4.5 sec. you are shooting a .45 acp with a muzzle velocity of 800 ft per sec. how far to lead ? 1. no need to lead 2. six inches 3. one foot 4. two feet
 January 28, 2006, 04:37 PM #2 rapier144 Senior Member   Join Date: October 2, 2005 Location: tennessee Posts: 686 I can't beleive you would ask such a question we are all non-violent here. __________________ Scan and Breathe Scan and BreatheStupidity should hurt
 January 28, 2006, 04:51 PM #3 AAshooter Senior Member   Join Date: March 5, 2001 Posts: 379 60 feet will be covered by the bullet at 800 feet/sec in about 75 msec (assuming constant bullet velocity). In 75 msec, the bad guy will travel two feet. __________________ Play hard, shoot often, leave well worn guns!
 January 28, 2006, 04:56 PM #4 XDoctor Senior Member   Join Date: May 30, 2004 Posts: 221 nm, answered my own question.
 January 28, 2006, 04:57 PM #5 joneb Senior Member   Join Date: December 10, 2005 Location: Central , OR Posts: 1,822 I don't know what made me think of this but when I did the math the answer suprised me . I would have guessed six inches .
 January 28, 2006, 08:11 PM #6 RandyDTC Member   Join Date: May 23, 2005 Location: Staunton, Virginia Posts: 57 About 2 feet. Randy __________________ Defensive Training Concepts, Inc. http://www.dt-concepts.com
 January 28, 2006, 09:30 PM #7 riverkeeper Senior Member   Join Date: December 4, 2004 Location: Tacoma, Washington Posts: 214 Great Topic-- 2 related Questions. If everything is the same except at 20 ft would it require a lead of 1/3 x 24 inches = 8 inches? Fixed lead v swinging to target? If trigger is pressed while swinging the HG at point with the BG ... would the swing moment be transferred to the bullet so that no lead would be required? We're not dealing with the speed of light here so I assume it would. __________________ "A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." -- Bertrand de Jouvenel ........ 'All the wooly-headed thinking explains the happy howling.' -- r
 January 28, 2006, 09:43 PM #8 joneb Senior Member   Join Date: December 10, 2005 Location: Central , OR Posts: 1,822 riverkeeper, the question did not account for the speed of the bullet at 60 ft. nor does it account for the time it takes the brain to tell the finger to pull the trigger. so the answer to your first question is yes. one may find a lead more than two feet is requierd. for the second I'll let a experienced dove or chucker hunter answer that.
 January 28, 2006, 09:48 PM #9 RandyDTC Member   Join Date: May 23, 2005 Location: Staunton, Virginia Posts: 57 It is important to maintain the lead on the target while pressing the trigger. 8.4 inches at 20 feet. Randy __________________ Defensive Training Concepts, Inc. http://www.dt-concepts.com
 January 28, 2006, 10:00 PM #10 Scope Senior Member   Join Date: September 27, 2005 Posts: 129 I also got 2 ft.
 January 28, 2006, 10:28 PM #11 rapier144 Senior Member   Join Date: October 2, 2005 Location: tennessee Posts: 686 Ah hell this is too much thinking where's my shotgun. __________________ Scan and Breathe Scan and BreatheStupidity should hurt
 January 28, 2006, 10:44 PM #12 Pointer Senior Member   Join Date: April 8, 2005 Location: Utah Posts: 2,559 No lead... off target... just aim at the leading edge... The follow through is far more important... Keep the gun moving along the arc until after the round goes off... __________________ . "Political correctness is tyranny with a happy face." Charlton Heston 30-06 FOREVER
 January 28, 2006, 11:36 PM #13 kentak Member   Join Date: January 28, 2006 Posts: 86 Yeah, 2 feet is what the numbers crunch to, BUT... ...your hypothetical has the BG being a damn fast runner. If it was an older guy with a bit of a belly, I'd say half the speed would be more realistic. In that case, lead by about a foot. K
 January 29, 2006, 01:10 AM #14 joneb Senior Member   Join Date: December 10, 2005 Location: Central , OR Posts: 1,822 when shooting a hand gun the thought of leading the shot did'nt seem to be a issue. but after doing the math it did seem relative. thanks for the input, I think randy and pointer came up with the best tactic for this scenario. and yes he was fast. but now what if the bad guys are shooting at you from a car the ability to lead the shot could be of more importance. Last edited by joneb; January 30, 2006 at 02:32 AM.
 January 29, 2006, 01:28 AM #15 bermo61 Member   Join Date: January 24, 2006 Posts: 79 The correct answer is DONT SHOOT! He is running perpendicular..not at you. He poses no threat and you cannot legally shoot now...because you are bound to get a bunch of anti gunners on the jury that will say that he was misunderstood as a child and that you...a gun toting trigger happy killer..are the real bad guy. Then you will spend the rest of your life in a cell with big leroy...learning not to sleep on your stomach!
 January 29, 2006, 01:33 AM #16 USNavy_233 Senior Member   Join Date: November 10, 2004 Location: Omaha, Nebraska Posts: 115 Bermo beat me to it. He's not running AT you and he's 60 FT away. I see no threat here. __________________ He is greatest, who is trained in the severest school. -General Thucydides, 424 BC
 January 29, 2006, 01:38 AM #17 bermo61 Member   Join Date: January 24, 2006 Posts: 79 Yeah but you guessed too...I just typed faster!
 January 29, 2006, 01:43 AM #18 Trip20 Senior Member   Join Date: March 21, 2005 Location: WI Posts: 2,181 This is where full auto and some tracer rounds really help the math impaired. To the PC-Police: I think it's safe to assume that in the question posed, it's a given that the circumstances in place warrant shooting a BG not running directly at you. What if it's a misunderstood child? Well, what if it's a misunderstood child running at your kids with an axe?
 January 29, 2006, 03:10 AM #19 joneb Senior Member   Join Date: December 10, 2005 Location: Central , OR Posts: 1,822 I posted this thread to bring awareness to the possibility for the need to lead. the scenario could have went like this: the BG just shot some one and it looks like he may finish him off. you yell at the BG to stop and he takes a shot at you and misses, then seeing you drawing your weapon runs for a car thirty feet away. you don't know if he's making a gettaway or taking cover. your in a parking lot with no cover near by. do you shoot or become target practice for the BG, or hope he gets in the car and drives away ?
 January 29, 2006, 03:19 AM #20 riverkeeper Senior Member   Join Date: December 4, 2004 Location: Tacoma, Washington Posts: 214 About the Scenario Setup. It is my understanding that in most states IF YOU PERSONALLY WITNESSED an especially brutal terrible crime against someone's person and fully understand what happened -- rape, murder -- you may (or may not) choose to use deadly force on the fleeing BG. Do not screw this up or you are submerged in DOO DOO forever. __________________ "A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." -- Bertrand de Jouvenel ........ 'All the wooly-headed thinking explains the happy howling.' -- r
 January 29, 2006, 01:57 PM #21 brickeyee Senior Member   Join Date: December 29, 2004 Posts: 3,342 Threat is over. No reason to shoot. You are not LE. Telling the judge "I thought he was seeking cover" is not likely to cut it at the trial.
January 29, 2006, 02:30 PM   #22
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member

Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 11,396
Quote:
 The correct answer is DONT SHOOT! He is running perpendicular..not at you. He poses no threat and you cannot legally shoot now...because you are bound to get a bunch of anti gunners on the jury that will say that he was misunderstood as a child and that you...a gun toting trigger happy killer..are the real bad guy. Then you will spend the rest of your life in a cell with big leroy...learning not to sleep on your stomach!
Quote:
 Bermo beat me to it. He's not running AT you and he's 60 FT away. I see no threat here.
Quote:
 Threat is over. No reason to shoot. You are not LE. Telling the judge "I thought he was seeking cover" is not likely to cut
Just how did you all determine that a bad guy running perpendicular to a shooter is no longer a threat to the shooter? How did you all determine a bad guy running perpendicular to the shooter isn't a danger to some bystander? Just what is it about 60 feet and running perpendicular to the shooter that somehow magically transforms the situation into a no shoot situation?

jibjab's query was not about the legalities and circumstances for which to justify the shot. He asked specifically what sort of lead would be needed if YOU HAD TO TAKE THE SHOT. In other words, the person was still a threat, hence you need to take the shot or feel it most prudent to take the shot so as to mitigate the threat, be it to you or another person.

In Somalia, US forces dealt with this sort of scenario, only with rifles. There would be a Somali crossing the street from one building to another, running all out, and hosing down the street at the American soldiers. Was he a threat? Hell yes. But y'all's interepretation, he isn't because he is running perpendicular to the American forces.

I am just guessing here, but I am inclined to believe that y'all don't think you can shoot a person in the back as part of self defense. You would be wrong as there are most definitely situations where the bad guys end up shot in the back and the shootings are 100% justified and legal.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011

 January 29, 2006, 11:51 PM #23 bermo61 Member   Join Date: January 24, 2006 Posts: 79 Tell you what...you shoot someone in the back..claim it was self defense in THIS country, and I will wish you the best of luck at your trial. But I would not count on being a free man for a long long time. Case in point...man rapes a 70 year old woman in her home to unconsciousness. She wakes up and realizes that he is watching T.V. in the other room...she grabs a gun from her dresser and when the man comes in to rape her again she shoots and kills him. Now this looks pretty open and shut right? Self defense! He had already committed a crime and was on his way back in for seconds. The district attorney filed charges for murder...he felt she could have climbed out the window rather than shoot him. The fact that she was on the third floor and 70 years old is what saved her at the trial. The point is you NEVER EVER know what some jerry springer watching jury is going to do...CCW availability is a wonderful legislation...but people who are trigger happy are going to ruin it if there is not an imminent threat to their safety or someone else. No where in the scenario is there the mention that he is running perpendicular to attack and kill someone is there? The point I was making is that that scenario should make one think...should I shoot or not...legally, its not a very defensible situation.
 January 29, 2006, 11:55 PM #24 bermo61 Member   Join Date: January 24, 2006 Posts: 79 And Jibjab had you added all the rest of the details to your scenario, it may have changed the responses! From the information provided..which was not much...no imminent threat existed. To take a life without that is what fuels the anti-gun crowd.
 January 30, 2006, 12:53 AM #25 joneb Senior Member   Join Date: December 10, 2005 Location: Central , OR Posts: 1,822 Well I think that D.A. has more pressing issues, like job security. And if the judge and or jury swallowed that load of garbage, I would be surpised. As far as this thread, it was a question of math, as to raise awareness to the possibility to leading your shot with a hand gun. bermo61 I suggest you read the entire thread, and then post.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Hogan's Alley     Tactics and Training     Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum     Handguns: The Revolver Forum     Handguns: General Handgun Forum The Hide     The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action     The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics     The Art of the Rifle: General     The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum     NFA Guns and Gear     The Hunt The North Corral     Lock and Load: Live Fire Exercises     Competition Shooting     Curios and Relics     Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting The Skunkworks     Gear and Accessories     The Smithy     Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting         Bullet Casting     The Harley Nolden Memorial Institute for Firearms Research The Conference Center     General Discussion Forum         TFL Photo Contest     Law and Civil Rights         Legal and Political     S.W.A.T. Magazine The Firing Line Gun Show     S.W.A.T. Exchange     Retail Deals and Feedback Forum Support     Site Questions and Tech Support (NO FIREARMS QUESTIONS)     Software and Function Testing

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM.

 -- vBulletin 3 ---- vBulletin 3 - variable fonts ---- Low profile (unsupported) Forum Home Page - Archive - Top