The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 15, 2015, 01:45 PM   #1
johnwilliamson062
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 7,225
Ruger No 1 V. No 3

Anyone like to comment as to accuracy between the two models? Looking at buying a single shot 45-70 as part of possibly ditching my Encore, and these seem to be the most attractive to me What about action strength? Weight? No. 3 seems to to be slightly more available at the "used but not abused" level I am searching in, but I don't know all that much about them.
__________________
$0 of an NRA membership goes to legislative action or court battles. Not a dime. Only money contributed to the NRA-ILA or NRA-PVF. Second Amendment Foundation is a solid alternative.
First Shotgun Thread First Rifle Thread First Pistol Thread
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old June 15, 2015, 01:57 PM   #2
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 11,996
The No 1 and No 3 are on The Same action, all differences are cosmetic.
The No 3 is lighter.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old June 15, 2015, 02:51 PM   #3
Paul B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,799
If you're looking as serious hunting thumper loads, the #3 will flat out kick the slats out from under you. If you can find one, the #1S isn't too bad in the recoil department. Probably should put a good refill pad on it though should you want to do the full bore stomping loads. Frankly, I've never even heard of a #1V in the Ruger #1 rifles. I've owned two #3 Rugers in .45-70 and loaded an shot bullets from 300 to 510 gr. from all three rifles. The #3s are all long gone but I still have the #1S. A 500 gr. cast bullet loaded to 1500 FPS in the #3 will definitely get your attention. Still quite noticeable in the #1S with the skimpy pad that came on mine. I seriously think you's be a lot happier with the heavier of the two guns, especially if you want to play with the stouter loadings. JMHO.
Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION!
Paul B. is online now  
Old June 15, 2015, 04:59 PM   #4
Old Stony
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 880
I've owned both over the years, and was never happy with the accuracy of either. Accuracy aside, both are on the light side for full 45/70 loads. A 500 grainer out of the #3 will loosen the fillings in your teeth.
The #1 is sure a pretty rifle though.
Old Stony is online now  
Old June 15, 2015, 06:26 PM   #5
kilimanjaro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 2,360
Put a good recoil pad on it, that helps tame the .45-70 load. The No. 3 is lighter in weight than the No. 1, just a few ounces of stock wood, so recoil is more pronounced.

The cartridge is not a tack driver. The rifle will shoot better than most folks.
kilimanjaro is offline  
Old June 15, 2015, 07:42 PM   #6
Axelwik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 12, 2012
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 426
I have a No. 1 in 375 Ruger and it's a tack-driver... like that from new.

No. 1 accuracy problems are usually associated with the forearm hanger, or people over-tightening the hanger screw. Lots of info on the subject - google it.
Axelwik is offline  
Old June 15, 2015, 08:38 PM   #7
Tony Z
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2013
Location: North Central Pennsyltucky
Posts: 202
My #1 in .45-70 is also an accurate #1 (about as accurate as one could expect a .45-70 to be!).

Working from memory, didn't the #3 lack a pistol grip on the butt stock end?
Tony Z is offline  
Old June 15, 2015, 10:25 PM   #8
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 13,248
The No.3 is a few ounces ligher, according to the books, but it FEELS much lighter than the No.1.

The No.3 has a straight grip stock, and the finger lever forms the "pistol grip". Also has a barrel band (why I don't know, other than cosmetic). Also came with a steel buttplate.

I have a good ventilated recoil pad on my ,45-70, and with the "standard" 400gr slugs at black powder speeds, the recoil is not bad. Also will put three shots in two holes at 50yds with a 2.5x post scope. so, about 2 moa with that load. I have shot 350gr Hornady @ 2200fps, and let me tell you THAT is recoil.

Also have No.3s in .22 Hornet and .30-40 Krag. Great little rifles, I actually prefer them to the No.1 except for (a) being out of production, and (b) limited caliber choice (see (a) ).

Consider them stalking rifles, short, light, handy, and quite accurate enough for game shooting. Not a bench gun, NOT a REPEATER, so group size is kind of ..why?

I have sold off my Marlin, and my Siamese Mauser .45-70, but have kept the sweet little Ruger. Another reason I like the No.3 is they were made back during the era when gun owners were still trusted to adjust their own triggers. The No.3 has a couple of allen screws, and if it doesn't have one when you get it, its only a few minutes work to give it a sweet crisp trigger pull.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 04:39 AM   #9
Tony Z
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2013
Location: North Central Pennsyltucky
Posts: 202
Thanks for the #3 description. It was in the very early 80's that I got my #1 in .45-70. I actually wanted a #3, but there were none to be had. I wanted the #3 for the exact description you gave-lightweight stalking rife. I had planned on peep sights and working up cast bullet loads & then on to fun chasing whitetails!

Unfortunately the #1 was too pretty to drill the receiver, let alone drag through the brush. So I turned a Model 94 .30-30 into my stalking, cast bullet, peep-sighted gun. The good old days of having time on your hands and the energy to run up and down the sides of hills.
Tony Z is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 06:16 AM   #10
eastbank
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2008
Location: pa.
Posts: 1,367
if you have a ruger #3 try 50grs H-4198 with a 300gr hornady or 300gr serria, it does kick and i sight it in on a lead sled and it will put three into one inch at 100yds with a 3x leupold scope. i have shot quite a few deer with that load, i try to double lung shoot deer no matter what rifle i,m useing. eastbank.
eastbank is offline  
Old June 24, 2015, 08:21 PM   #11
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 4,793
No3

The barrel band on the carbine cause Bill R. wanted it that way I'm sure. Actually, I'm not sure if it serves any function, it well may, but much was done at "old Ruger" 'cause the old man said so.

"Old Ruger" had a knack for knowing what shooters liked, and wanted. The band on the carbine likely was an attempt to link the carbine to the cavalry carbines of the past, which had barrel bands as well. So too the early .44 auto carbines, which harken images of the M1 carbine of US military ilk.

I'd think a No3 in 45-70 would kick like a mule. I'm hoping someday mine will be in .223!!!!!!!!!
bamaranger is offline  
Old June 26, 2015, 01:08 PM   #12
dgludwig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2005
Location: North central Ohio
Posts: 5,308
I don't know about the No. 3, but my No. 1 V, chambered in .220 Swift, is the most accurate of all the many rifles I own when using factory ammunition.
__________________
ONLY AN ARMED PEOPLE CAN BE TRULY FREE ; ONLY AN UNARMED PEOPLE CAN EVER BE ENSLAVED
...Aristotle
NRA Benefactor Life Member
dgludwig is offline  
Old June 26, 2015, 04:51 PM   #13
AK103K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2001
Posts: 8,662
With heavier loadings, it does. Just look at the #3's stock, and think of shooting a 10/22 in 45/70, and you'd be right on.

With something like a 300 grain lead bullet over 214 grains of Trail Boss, its a pussycat, and a lot of fun to shoot.
AK103K is offline  
Old June 27, 2015, 02:49 PM   #14
Drm50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 10, 2014
Posts: 269
#1/#3

I've owned both 1 & 3 in 45/70. Shot both with 300gr JHPs and max charge of
IMR 3031. On bench you know it's there,but in hunting situation it's not that
bad. I live in Ohio, we have new limited rifle season, 45/70 is legal. I wish I
had 3 back. 45/70 are hard to come by around here. Would be perfect for Ohio
deer. Marlin 95 I have now kicks just as bad and not as neat to carry. Only 3
I have left is 223, my favorite sneak varment gun.
Drm50 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2015 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.10355 seconds with 9 queries