|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 28, 2005, 04:01 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2005
Posts: 4
|
The most kickarse cartrige
ok, as some of you may know, The WWII german tank the King Tiger had an 88mm main gun that was diff from the orginal tiger.(diff b/c it had a larger shell case, more gun powder) It shot a 22 pound projectile with a muzzle velocity of 3300 feet per second. Now it seems that all the high velocity ammo these days for small arms have very small bullets. what cartrige would be analoges to the King tiger 88? (extream velocity, huge bullet) the 5.56 NATO round has the high velocity, but its bullet weight is very small and consequently its muzzle engery is very low. i would guess it would be a 150 grain bullet with a long barrel and a muzzle velocity of 4000 feet/second, is that possible?
|
December 28, 2005, 05:32 PM | #2 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,187
|
Quote:
How about .50 BMG? IIRC, a ~650 gr bullet at ~3000fps? Quote:
__________________
The test of character is not 'hanging in' when you expect light at the end of the tunnel, but performance of duty, and persistence of example when you know no light is coming. - Vice Admiral James Stockdale, USN (ret.) Last edited by Twycross; December 28, 2005 at 07:05 PM. |
||
December 28, 2005, 06:17 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2004
Location: God's side of Washington State
Posts: 1,601
|
I bet barrel life wasn't all that long.
__________________
God Bless our Troops especially our Snipers. |
December 28, 2005, 07:52 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: November 14, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 52
|
** I bet barrel life wasn't all that long. **
A battletank isn't built for eternity either. The basic 8,8 Flak 18/L56 (56 lengths of caliber) was designed to engage aircraft at an altitude of 12000 meters. The Königstiger's KwK 43/L71 was an improved version of this. Wear & tear don't count in combat. I don't think it makes any sense to compare ballistic properties between artillery and small arms. The two are "playing" in different leagues. |
December 28, 2005, 08:33 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2005
Posts: 4
|
reply
yeah comparigng tank rounds was a bad idea, but how about this the germans had an AT rifle that was chambered for 7.92x94mm http://www.antitank.co.uk/images/792x94.jpg
it had a muzzle velocity of 4150 feet/second now the gun did weigh 27 lbs and the barrel was 47 inches long but they did use it http://www.antitank.co.uk/images/pzb39_2.jpg |
December 29, 2005, 11:04 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 11, 2005
Location: eastern Kansas
Posts: 603
|
Using the Taylor Knock Out Formula, that 88mm round had a TKO of 251528.
A 150 grain .308 projectile moving at 4000 fps has a TKO of 26. So according to John "Pandoro" Taylor, the 88mm has 9674 times more killing power. |
December 30, 2005, 01:54 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: November 14, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 52
|
Great hint! Any source available?
|
December 30, 2005, 05:45 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 11, 2005
Location: eastern Kansas
Posts: 603
|
TKO is calculated by taking the velocity of the projectile in feet per second times the diameter of the projectile in thousands of an inch times the weight of the projectile in pounds.
There are 7000 grains in a pound. There are 25.4 mm in an inch. So to figure the TKO of a 150 grain, .30 bullet at 4,000 fps: 4000 x .308 x 150/7000 = 26.4 An 88mm shell is around 3.46 inches in diameter. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|