The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 11, 1999, 02:48 PM   #1
.
Staff
 
Join Date: October 6, 1998
Location: My wife's house...
Posts: 2,655
I'm very familiar with the .308 USN conversion (chamber sleeve & mag-well spacer).

My current interest is for a "Tanker" carbine conversion to .35Whelen or .375Whelen (brush gun), and a standard rifle configuration to something around 6.5x72mm, while retaining full use of the semi-auto functions.

My initial concerns are gas pressures, porting, operating parts inertia (battering) etc.

Has anyone any experience with these sorts of conversions that they're willing to share?

Are there any online custom conversion sites or forums that address such issues?

Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Mykl
. is offline  
Old November 11, 1999, 07:26 PM   #2
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,464
About the only bit of your post I can talk about is the gas pressure. If memory serves, the pressure at the port of the standard M1 is 2,000 psi, from the GI cartridge pressure of 47,000 psi. (If anybody knows differently , please correct me.)

Anyhow, if you load a hotter cartridge, the hole must be smaller. For your 6.5, you could probably safely assume that the ratio of the pressures should be as the ratio of the cross-sectional areas of the gas ports. More pressure = smaller hole.

For a tanker length, the pressure at the gas port in the shorter barrel will be higher than the gas port out at the end of the longer barrel. Same deal as above.

Hope this helps.

, Art
Art Eatman is offline  
Old November 11, 1999, 11:29 PM   #3
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 19,333
Hi, Mykl,

The M1 is really made to work with one cartridge. Even the .308 conversions have had problems. The .35 Whelen is not too far out, but the 6.5x72(?) would be 9mm too long. (By the way, the only 6.5x72 I know of is a resized version of the old straight rimmed 7x72R. Maybe I missed something.)
Anyway, I think it would be an interesting and quite costly experiment. Remember the cartridge has strict length limits and has to work with the clip unless you modify the magazine as well.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old November 15, 1999, 10:37 PM   #4
PoiDog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 1999
Location: IL
Posts: 219
Jim Keenan:
You mentioned problems with the .308 Navy conversions. Could you elaborate on these problems? I've just purchased an IHC Garand converted by the Navy to .308 and I'm curious about what problems to expect. Thanks in advance.

PoiDog

[This message has been edited by PoiDog (edited November 15, 1999).]
PoiDog is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06388 seconds with 9 queries