The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Competition Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 3, 2005, 01:25 PM   #1
Savage99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2004
Posts: 344
Palma bullet choice.

What is the bullet brand of choice today? The Sierra SMK has been standard but the Lapua 155 Sencor has a higher "published" ballistic coeficient.

Thanks
Savage99 is offline  
Old December 3, 2005, 01:29 PM   #2
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 10,925
Not my event, but lots discussion at
http://www.long-range.com/forums/index.php?showforum=32

I think you are going to have to do all that tiresome loading and shooting to pick the one most accurate in your particular rifle. Information not available on Gorenet.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old December 4, 2005, 12:17 AM   #3
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,142
"...a higher "published" ballistic coeficient..." Whoopee. Doesn't mean your rifle will shoot them well. Wouldn't hurt to work up a load for them though.
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old December 4, 2005, 01:07 AM   #4
Zak Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 1999
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Posts: 2,675
I have shot over over 2500 of the 155gr Lapua Scenars through my AI-AWP rifle, in factory and hand-loaded ammunition. I use the published BC value of 0.508 along with the actual measured muzzle velocity from my rifle and appropriate environmental conditions as inputs to any of the ballistic calculators such as Sierra or Exbal. These produce drop values which I have verified within about 0.5 MOA out to 800-825 yards at an ambient altitude of 5000'. (I say accurate within 0.5 MOA because most of my targets are right around 1 MOA at those distances, and the data was proven by making hits on steel.)

This would suggest that the published BC value is accurate. Some guys over on Long-Range.com have posted similar experience.

The 155 Scenar definitely is more sensitive to barrel/chamber setup than a more common bullet like the 155 SMK. Neither my old AR10 (20") or a friend's LTR would shoot the Scenars worth anything. My AWP has shot its best groups (I'm sure limited by my ability) with the 155 Scenar, however (between 0.2 and 0.3 MOA - would have to check logbook for exact size).


The 155 Scenar's high BC looks suspect until you place one next to a 175SMK-- the 155 is a longer bullet.
__________________
Zak Smith . DEMIGOD LLC . THUNDER BEAST ARMS CORP . COLORADO MULTI-GUN
My PM inbox full? Send e-mail instead.
Zak Smith is offline  
Old December 7, 2005, 01:37 AM   #5
atek3
Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2002
Posts: 38
how is the 155 longer than the 175? Secant versus tangent? "Pointy-er"?

atek3
atek3 is offline  
Old December 7, 2005, 01:45 AM   #6
Zak Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 1999
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Posts: 2,675
It's just over 0.050" longer than the 175SMK. Here's why:

[ link to LARGER image ]


The first 2/5ths of it is hollow.
__________________
Zak Smith . DEMIGOD LLC . THUNDER BEAST ARMS CORP . COLORADO MULTI-GUN
My PM inbox full? Send e-mail instead.
Zak Smith is offline  
Old December 8, 2005, 03:08 AM   #7
atek3
Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2002
Posts: 38
you suck at sectioning bullets...

j/k

atek3
atek3 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07186 seconds with 7 queries