The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 30, 2005, 09:15 AM   #1
jreese0
Junior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2005
Posts: 1
Ruger M77-rs Safety Off To Open Bolt

I have owned a Ruger M77-RS 270 cal. for years and I have never been able to open the bolt with the safety [on]. A friend of mine recently bought a 30-06 model that the bolt does open wtih the safety [on]. Does anyone know if this is a flaw on my rifle and if so is it repairable?
jreese0 is offline  
Old November 30, 2005, 10:09 AM   #2
ClarkEMyers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2004
Location: PacWest
Posts: 454
Tang safety Ruger 77's are 2 position by design and lock the bolt.

Tang safety Ruger 77's are 2 position by design and lock the bolt by design. MarkII with the safety on the bolt sleeve are 3 position by design and allow for opening the bolt with the safety on. Locking the bolt was long touted as a feature to ensure that the bolt would be in battery when the rifle was brought up to fire and the safety released. I'm very much inclined to agree. The unlocked bolt might, or might not, swing open just a tad if the bolt handle hits some brush or what have you.

My preference is the tang safety design. It is trivial to modify the tang safety so that it does not lock the bolt. So far as I know there is no advantage to a 2 position safety that does not lock the bolt. So far as I know Ruger has not advocated nor performed any such modification on the tang safety Model 77.

Folks can modify their own rifles in most any way that does not violate local, state or federal laws as for instance short barreled rifles, full auto and so forth. I'd suggest going with as intended by the maker for almost all purposes.
ClarkEMyers is offline  
Old November 30, 2005, 10:44 AM   #3
support_six
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 2000
Location: Richland, WA
Posts: 678
I support ClarkEMyers point of view. I've owned a Ruger M77 w/ tang safety for over 20 years and find that type safety to be very easy to use when beset with "buck fever"! It's like a fine shotgun and nothing gives you a rush like that first pheasant that busts loose from under your feet first thing in the morning. The "positive feed" of the Mark II is a necessary thing for a "combat" rifle but hardly necessary for North American big game.

Besides, my .30-06 M77 holds one more round than an equivilent Mark II!
support_six is offline  
Old November 30, 2005, 07:08 PM   #4
jrklaus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 25, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 520
As I understand it, the idea behind a three-position safety is for unloading in a "still-on-safe" condition. The middle position unlocks the bolt, but the firing pin is still blocked. Everyone must decide for themselves if that is worthwhile or not. The three-position safety was considered to be one of the most desirable features of the pre-62(?) Winchester Model 70, the "rifleman's rifle." Ruger adopted it along with controlled-round feed and a fixed ejector in the Mark II rifles.
jrklaus is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06779 seconds with 7 queries