![]() |
|
|||||||
| Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Staff Alumnus
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Posts: 2,926
|
Yesterday, I received my CQC-S that Lou Alessi sent me. Just like my post on the CQC-I for the Kahr MK9, this holster is amazingly beautiful. It is very original and well-built.
The CQC/S is a belt holster. Personally, I wore it on my strong side hip. It has a 15% cant which makes for a very fast draw. The loops have snaps for easy on, easy off. The mouth band is reinforced so the holster will not collapse upon drawing. The CQC/S is custom molded for perfect fit for a large variety of guns. I must add that carrying around close to 4 lbs of 1911 steel is normally a chore. However, this holster made wearing that much weight VERY comfortable. In the past, I bought $165 holsters in order to wear my full size 1911's all day. No need anymore to spend that much money. Holster will run you $90 but well worth it. Wearing a full size 1911 and Kahr MK9 with Lou's holsters. CQC/S with my Les Baer
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: January 31, 1999
Location: SE Michigan - USA
Posts: 4,039
|
Good work isn't it?
------------------ "If there be treachery, let there be jihad." Ne Conjuge Nobiscum |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2000
Location: Western SC
Posts: 663
|
Thanks for the pics, Son. You gotta great butt, but let's talk holsters for a minute.
I am considering this model to replace the fobus paddle but was wondering if you found the snap assembly too bulky? Did it go on/come off easily? The system is identical to my duty belt keepers but... How high does it ride? I have massive love handles (for a sound purchase, of course) and have to wear the belt low. Can you get a high-ride version? It is definitely the best I've seen to date and I hope it will work for me. Maybe it'd be better to get lyposuction first and then shop for holsters. Again, great butt. ------------------ When Reason Fails..... |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 1999
Location: Knoxville, in the Free State of Tennesse
Posts: 4,191
|
Have you ever tried a Sparks VM-2? How does it compare in terms of thickness? I realize the VM-2 is an IWB but it seems comparable, and I prefer the spaced belt loops.
[This message has been edited by buzz_knox (edited November 06, 2000).] |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Posts: 374
|
Just yesterday, I was using my Alessi CQC-S (made for a P-35). The CQC-S is wonderfully stable on the belt. The fit, finish, and overall workmanship is exceptional. These are great holsters!
Rosco |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 1999
Location: orlando fl
Posts: 751
|
Aw crap I wanted to make the butt joke
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 28, 2000
Posts: 4,062
|
buzz:
I've got a Milt Sparks VersaMax2 for my Kahr MK9. I use it as a tuckable, and it conceals pretty well. You do have to blouse your shirt a bit, so a slightly larger shirt works best. But that lets you go without a cover garment. Someone who looks carefully may see the clips under your belt or the bulge of the belt line. Downsides to the VM2 are that it is something of a pain to put on and tuck in your shirt. And if you have to use the facilities, you have to tuck in your shirt again. I also find it to not be as comfortable as my IWB holster from Rusty Sherrick. My Kahr MK9 is a whole lot smaller than an M1911, so I don't know how well it would work for a larger gun. M1911 |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|