The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 8, 2005, 11:38 PM   #1
H&K4Life
Member
 
Join Date: October 2, 2005
Posts: 77
"Starter tournment" IDPA or USPSA (IPSC)

Ok. I am not trying to fuel the grand debate, I am going to enter a tournment, and was wondering which one to start off with the DPA or the PSA? (no I can't just choose one, I have to do both)

I look at the IPSC and just wonder, "Why they just don't go ahead and call it the STI PSC" because that is what most guys use anyway. Hell, they even promote the 30th anniversary race gun on the IPSC site!

Will the usual belt, holster, 2 mag carrier, 1911, ears and eyes be enough to play in the IPSC or would I just be better off sticking with the IDPA?

(why not call it the 2011 Invitational)
H&K4Life is offline  
Old October 9, 2005, 06:24 AM   #2
DeltaWhiskey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2005
Posts: 226
I just shot my first USPSA match last month and basically went with the same rig you just mentioned (used a CZ 75B instead of the 1911). I shot what is called production class and on that particular day they were pleanty of fellows shooting the same thing. Those are the guys you're shooting against, you just get to watch and be amazed with the dudes who bring out the Open class pistols with all of the geegaws and doohickies attached.

I had a good time, but think I still prefer IDPA.
__________________
"I'm DeltaWhiskey on the other forums, too."
DeltaWhiskey is offline  
Old October 9, 2005, 09:55 AM   #3
kymasabe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 10, 2005
Location: Northern by birth, Southern by choice.
Posts: 1,712
I prefer IPSC....production class.
__________________
God's creatures big and small, eat them one, eat them all.
kymasabe is offline  
Old October 9, 2005, 01:29 PM   #4
Christopher II
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 1999
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,349
I prefer USPSA. Higher round count, higher level of competition, more consistent rule base.

Most USPSA shooters who are (A.) seriously invested in the game, and (B.) shooting in Limited or Open Division shoot a double-stack 1911. Reason is simple - double-stack 1911s are the best guns for that particular game.

There's nothing that says you have to shoot a double-stack 1911. I shoot a Glock 35 in Limited and do quite well. In Production Division, you can shoot almost anything - Glock 17, Springfield XDs, and CZ-75s are all popular. There are some weirdos who shoot Open Glocks and CZs, even.

- Chris
__________________
"There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him." – Robert Heinlein

"Contrary to popular belief, your vote does not matter, and you cannot make a difference." - Bob Murphy, "Picking Neither of Two Evils"

My PGP Public Key
Christopher II is offline  
Old October 10, 2005, 03:41 PM   #5
Zak Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 1999
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Posts: 2,675
Shoot one of each and see where YOU have more fun.

A single-stack 1911 is fine for USPSA "Limited 10". I shot one there for over a year. You might want more mag carriers, however. I used 4, 10-round Wilson mags.

Not sure why all the snide comments about the SV/STI double-stack. It's basically a 1911 that takes wider mags.
__________________
Zak Smith . DEMIGOD LLC . THUNDER BEAST ARMS CORP . COLORADO MULTI-GUN
My PM inbox full? Send e-mail instead.
Zak Smith is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06440 seconds with 7 queries