The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 7, 2005, 06:44 PM   #1
jazzbass62
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2005
Location: Northern Foothills of LA
Posts: 2
Rem 1100 or Rem 11/87??

I'm fairly new to shotguns, now own an 870 for home defense and know how to use it, but I want to buy a new autoloader for shooting clays just for fun. After chatting with several folks I've narrowed the shotgun choice down to Beretta's 391 or one of the two Remingtons. I want to make sure the autoloader I buy will be reliable for shooting light target loads (given proper maintenance and cleaning of course...). Which Remington would you recommend between the 1100 and the 11/87 (3-inch receiver) and why?? Thanks ahead for your interest and advice!
jazzbass62 is offline  
Old September 7, 2005, 08:43 PM   #2
KE4YYD
Junior Member
 
Join Date: July 16, 2005
Posts: 13
The 11-87 was supposed to replace the 1100. As you can see it did not. Unless you want to shoot magnums tghe 1100 should be your choice. I have 2 1100's bought in the mid 70's still going strong.
KE4YYD is offline  
Old September 7, 2005, 08:51 PM   #3
mathman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 15, 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,531
Why is it that the 1100 is still in production if the 11-87 was supposed to replace it? What are the differences between them? It seems that a good number of people still like the 1100 more than the 11-87.
mathman is offline  
Old September 7, 2005, 10:42 PM   #4
jazzbass62
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2005
Location: Northern Foothills of LA
Posts: 2
This is exactly why I'm asking. The 1100 restricts you to 2 3/4-inch shells but I'm fine with that for my application. But I feel that if I overlook the 11/87 somehow am I making a mistake?? Doesn't sound like it. I've heard the 11/87 is finicky with light target loads. Is that only on the 3 1/2 magnum receiver version?? Then my quandry becomes am I giving up on versatility? With a limited budget you can't own 'em all
jazzbass62 is offline  
Old September 7, 2005, 11:45 PM   #5
impact
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2005
Location: the great state of Texas
Posts: 854
I bought a used 1100 in 20ga. I fell in love with that gun! Never shot a 11-87 so I don't know the difference. I would much rather shoot my 1100 than my M1 Super 90 and I love my m1 as well. Just can have more fun with the 1100.

If you want the gun for ducks and geese you may want to go with the 11-87. I really think you need 3 inch shells with steel shot for geese. I think 3 1/2 shell are over rated
impact is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 12:32 PM   #6
auto45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2002
Posts: 426
I would try to "feel" or better yet, shoot the 1100 and 1187 to see which you like better. The balance was different for me whan I picked them up, but it was a long time ago.

1100's are marketed as target type guns, mostly, and 1187's as hunting.

Many people feel the Beretta is a better auto. It is a better design no doubt, but I'd still pick the one that feels best to you.

Have fun.
auto45 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06240 seconds with 7 queries