The Firing Line Forums
Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > S.W.A.T. Magazine

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 4, 2002, 03:42 PM   #1
George Hill
Staff Alumnus
 
Join Date: October 14, 1998
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,547
The M4 Article

Proof positive that SWAT doesn't bow to the advertisers. Louis Awerbuck's article is CLASSIC.
I was laughing out loud while reading it. This is a peice of work you don't read very often.
Kudos to louis for calling a spade a spade. Or in this case a shotgun a POS.
__________________
MAD OGRE
George Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5, 2002, 01:32 AM   #2
Rich Lucibella
Staff
 
Join Date: October 6, 1998
Location: South Florida
Posts: 10,163
Yeah-
I don't think we'll be approaching Benelli for an ad anytime soon. The concept has much to recommend it. Like so many designs, however, the designers forgot to go the last 1/4 mule by getting it into the hands of REAL SHOOTERS before sending it to the assembly line.

Actually, I was real surprised. Benelli's been around long enough and has enough proven designs under its belt to know better.
Rich
__________________
S.W.A.T. Magazine
Weapons, Training and Tactics for the Real World
Join us at TFL or at AR15.com or on Facebook
Rich Lucibella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5, 2002, 07:17 AM   #3
KSFreeman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2001
Location: Lafayette, Indiana--American-occupied America
Posts: 5,416
"Herrre's a clue for you! This *&^%$##@ thing doesn't worrrk. Call the boys in R&D!"
__________________
"Arguments of policy must give way to a constitutional command." Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 602 (1980).
KSFreeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5, 2002, 09:32 AM   #4
George Hill
Staff Alumnus
 
Join Date: October 14, 1998
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,547
Seems a quick fix if an M4 lands in your hands is to order a replacement fixed stock for it.
Other Benelli shotguns seem to be sized just fine. At least for me.
__________________
MAD OGRE
George Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6, 2002, 06:01 AM   #5
Don Gwinn
Staff Emeritus
 
Join Date: March 9, 2000
Location: Virden, IL
Posts: 5,917
I just got my copy a couple of days ago--how about Rob's take on the Israeli training session?

Though, with that said, I must also say it seems to work well for them. Maybe it matters less exactly how you train than that there's a guy behind you with fireworks and a bullhorn to make you train like a madman.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don Gwinn: Chicago Gun Rights Examiner
Don Gwinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 7, 2002, 04:01 PM   #6
OF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2000
Posts: 2,239
What a fantastic issue all around! Your best yet, folks.

And keep Pat Rogers writing! No rest for that guy, he's too valuable.

- Gabe
OF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 19, 2002, 01:36 AM   #7
Long Path
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 5,888
I'll admit that I chuckled quite a bit over Louis A's article, too!

Really, he seemed to downplay the good points quite a bit: it functioned well, the sights were good and robust, the gun pattered well, and the system uses an elegant method of giving you an extra round.

Just goes to show you, one or two wrong spices can ruin a dang good stew.

L.P.
__________________
"Welcome to The Firing Line, a virtual community dedicated to the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership."T.F.L. Policy Page
Will you, too, be one who stands in the gap? ____________ Better and Better, the blog. _____
Long Path is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 19, 2002, 12:34 PM   #8
Don Gwinn
Staff Emeritus
 
Join Date: March 9, 2000
Location: Virden, IL
Posts: 5,917
I think his point with regard to the good points is that previous Benellis do all those things. His exact observation was "The M4 doesn't do anything that other weapons don't already do, so what is its purpose?"

Of course, we all know that its purpose is to be newer than the old models (and thus instantly better) and to introduce new features. I think Mr. Awerbuck's problem was that the new features were so impractical as to overshadow the rest.

I shot with a guy with a Benelli w/Vang Comp conversion a few weeks ago, and his gun was reliable with nice sights. It also used that famous Benelli carrier system so it held that extra round. The question is, why buy the new gun with its problems when you can have the old gun without them?

(Not that I'd turn my nose up at an M4 if you offered it to me, but then Mr. Awerbuck and I use shotguns for very different purposes. I bet that short stock would be perfect for deer hunting in four layers of insulated clothing, but it might give Mr. Awerbuck a heart attack if I suggested such a thing. )
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don Gwinn: Chicago Gun Rights Examiner
Don Gwinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20, 2002, 10:27 AM   #9
Correia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 1998
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 3,740
I handled an M4 at the SHOT show, and I thought the stock sucked. And that is being nice.

I imagine that if you replaced it with a real stock that would solve most of the guns shortcomings.
Correia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 29, 2002, 10:56 AM   #10
C.R.Sam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 1999
Location: Dewey, AZ
Posts: 12,859
Quote:
go the last 1/4 mule
Rich...would that be a metric mule or a SAE mule ?

New and innovative sells new product.
A shame that new isn't always an improvement.
Marketing rules.

Sam
C.R.Sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15, 2002, 02:45 PM   #11
D.W. Drang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 25, 2001
Location: The Deepest Pacific NorthWet
Posts: 590
OK, I haven't read the article yet but I had the impresion from the piece on American Shooter that this was designed to US Marine Corps specs--is that not so?
And if it IS so, shouldn't the blame for the deisgn be aimed at 8th & I, rather than Bennelli?
(Father of a friend of mine was a designer at GM,and had a hand in designing the Gamma Goat. When we found that out we almost killed him. He said that all of it's problems were a result of design parameters in the original concept.)
__________________
Quote:
Imagine you're an idiot. Now imagine that you're in Congress--but I repeat myself."
S. Clemens
http://thecluemeter.blogspot.com/
D.W. Drang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15, 2002, 03:52 PM   #12
Denny Hansen
Staff
 
Join Date: June 29, 2001
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 2,363
The Benelli M4 (or M1014 by its military designation) was a result of military specs. We have been advised by both Benelli and H&K that many of its shortcomings are being rectified.

Denny
__________________
S.W.A.T. Magazine
Weapons, Training and Tactics for the Real World
Join us at TFL or at AR15.com or on Facebook
Denny Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20, 2002, 10:15 PM   #13
Foxy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 14, 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 846
There's an article in GunWorld or a similar rag about the M4 that I read today. The stock must be really bad; they even mentioned that the cheekpiece 'might need redesign' (the rest of the gun got a glowing review).
Foxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 3, 2002, 01:35 AM   #14
Skunkabilly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2001
Location: Land of stinky cabbage and potable rubbing alcohol
Posts: 2,132
I think that folding stock is ugly...even if it was legal, I may opt for the standard stock. Because looks DO matter

I guess I gotta find me this mag. I hope I can find it somewhere down here in Socal.
__________________
Skunky's World of Mud and Guts and Barbecue Sauce: www.skunkabilly.com
"Stupid American! There's no bloody sales tax for tea in Hong Kong. Didn't you start a war over a tea tax?" -- Hong Kong tea merchant
Skunkabilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 3, 2002, 06:50 PM   #15
Denny Hansen
Staff
 
Join Date: June 29, 2001
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 2,363
skunk-
The article on the M4 (or the M1014 in militaryese) was featured in the September issue. Back issues are available here http://swatmagazine.com/archives.htm

Denny
__________________
S.W.A.T. Magazine
Weapons, Training and Tactics for the Real World
Join us at TFL or at AR15.com or on Facebook
Denny Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 19, 2005, 07:01 PM   #16
docwatson
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 19, 2005
Location: NoVa
Posts: 5
Is this Article still available anywhere?

I was searching for more info on my shotgun and wanted to read the pros and cons...

Thanks!
__________________
Chris Watson, CCNP
Colt M4 6920 Carbine, Benelli M4 LE, HK Mark 23
Baghdad, Iraq until Jan 2006
Washington, DC 2006 and beyond
docwatson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 19, 2005, 07:16 PM   #17
Denny Hansen
Staff
 
Join Date: June 29, 2001
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 2,363
Doc,

That was the July 2002 issue. it is available in both print and PDF dowload version at www.swatmag.com

Denny
__________________
S.W.A.T. Magazine
Weapons, Training and Tactics for the Real World
Join us at TFL or at AR15.com or on Facebook
Denny Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Page generated in 0.10692 seconds with 9 queries