The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 29, 2005, 06:44 PM   #1
elpistolero
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2004
Posts: 2
Rem 700 MR LSS v. Ruger M77 Sporter

I’m finally planning on moving from the varmit world to bigger game such as deer and elk. I want to purchase my rifle now so that I have plenty of time this summer to shot it and get comfortable.

I’ve narrowed down my choices to either the Ruger M77 MkII Sporter or the Remington 700 Mountain Rifle LSS in 30-06. While it looks like the Rem 700’s are a more popular rifle, I’m partial to Ruger. I still haven’t had the opportunity to shot (or even hold) any of the Ruger Sporter models.

I’m looking for opinions both general and specific. Thanks.
elpistolero is offline  
Old May 30, 2005, 01:27 PM   #2
Mike Hull
Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2004
Location: Cottonwood, AZ USA
Posts: 76
Welcome to TFL! Enjoy!

As for your question, of the choices offered, and in a hunting rifle, I'd go with the Ruger.

For target, and varmint, accuracy of the Ruger seems to lag a bit behind the Remington.
I don't think you'd notice the difference on a hunting model though.

Whatever your choice, good luck to you.
__________________
Mike
Mike Hull is offline  
Old May 30, 2005, 02:53 PM   #3
Impact of Reason
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 13, 2005
Location: nacogdoches, texas
Posts: 205
never handled the ruger rifles, but you certainly cant go wrong with the remington 700.
__________________
Those who believe in gun control think that we don't need guns to protect us against an oppressive government, because the Constitution has internal safeguards, and the government should ban and seize all guns, therefore violating the 2nd, 4th, and 5th Amendments of that Constitution, thereby becoming an oppressive government.
Impact of Reason is offline  
Old May 30, 2005, 03:00 PM   #4
Death from Afar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 7, 2004
Location: Living the dream in Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 1,610
Much as I love Ruger Autos, I do not like their bolt actions. I find the quality control and accuracy is largely hit or miss ( yuk, yuk ) but you get more consitant results with the Remingtons.

By the way .30-06 is an awesome choice of caliber, it is one of the greatest there is.
__________________
"Beware of the Man with one gun...he probably isnt into guns enough to be safe with it".
Death from Afar is offline  
Old May 30, 2005, 03:48 PM   #5
Zekewolf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 2, 2005
Posts: 886
You'll get a much better, fully adjustable trigger with the Remington, and you'll probably find that the bolt's a lot smoother, also.
Zekewolf is offline  
Old May 30, 2005, 05:57 PM   #6
elpistolero
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2004
Posts: 2
Thanks for the advice. I think I'm dropping the idea of getting the 700 mountain rifle and will get the 700 CDL. I plan to spend a lot of time at the range with it and think I'll be better off with the slightly thicker barrel.
elpistolero is offline  
Old May 31, 2005, 08:13 PM   #7
Picher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,606
You made the right choice, unless you plan to hike a long ways, then the Mountain Rifle gets the edge.

The CDL is a great rifle. I already have two 700s and don't need another, but that would be the rifle I'd choose if I were to buy one.

Hard to find fault in the .30-06 also, except if you were going to shoot a lot, since recoil is a bit much from the bench. I like my .270 with reduced 90 grain HP loads for target shooting, then use some very hot 130 grain Nosler BTs for deer. Funny thing is that they shoot to the same POI at 100 yards. Totally amazing.

Picher
Picher is offline  
Old May 31, 2005, 08:26 PM   #8
esldude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 2004
Posts: 437
Definitely the Remington was the good choice. In general Ruger just isn't as accurate imo.

No way to fault going with the 30-06.

But moving up from varmint calibers, you might be happier with a 7mm-8. This is a pretty efficient round, and will be more comfortable to shoot anyway. Is pretty popular around my parts with deer hunters. Don't know about elk, should be enough, but someone who knows could comment on that. But again, not wrong to go with 30-06.
esldude is offline  
Old May 31, 2005, 08:34 PM   #9
TPAW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2005
Posts: 2,859
Both Ruger and Rem are fine rifles. I think your choice of 30-06 is very wise.
Have you considered a Savage? I've been hearing lots of good things about them in terms of accuracy and the new accu trigger which can be adjusted to you liking.
I've looked at a few, and although not fancy, they are a lot of gun for the money.
At least take a look before you buy anything else.
At Dick's they go for $ 335.00 with a mounted 3x9 scope in a synthetic stock.
Wood stocks I think are about $20.00 or so more.
TPAW is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08578 seconds with 9 queries