The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 23, 2002, 06:54 PM   #1
Double Eagle
Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2000
Posts: 17
Thompson questions

I recall reading somewhere that one of the problems with the Thompson sub machinegun during WW2 was that it took a relatively long time to complete one, that the materials, fit and finish were of excellent quality in comparison with later designs designed to be mass produced easily.

Was this the main failing of the Thompson, or are there other design flaws? (I am aware of the failure of the 'drum' magazines versus the 'stick' magazines)

If the Thompson is obselete today, then why? Rate of fire? Weight? Dimensions? How would it stack up against a truly contemporary .45 carbine design like Heckler and Koch's USC?
__________________
RQ
---------------

"A warrior may choose pacifism. Others are condemned to it."
Double Eagle is offline  
Old December 23, 2002, 07:57 PM   #2
DrDremel
Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2002
Location: South East Michigan
Posts: 68
The Thompson is obsolete in the following. The Blish Block is not needed. The parts are all milled, too expensive to manufacture. The sights are not the greatest, The flip up ladder is too nice and optimistic, the M1a1 version is not adjustable. The mag area could use some flaring for quicker mag changes. And the number one reason is that is weighs almost 11 pounds. As for shooting, no modern subgun will outshoot it. It is a work of art.
DrDremel is offline  
Old December 23, 2002, 10:19 PM   #3
Hkmp5sd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
The early Thompsons were complex to manufacture. They simplified the process and mass produced them. Many WWII veterans swear by them. The main problem was that they were heavy.

It is "obsolete" in the same way the Colt Single Action Army is considered obsolete. There were improvements made in the firearms technology areas which resulted in "better" SMG's. Like the Colt 1911, it is a classic, still well regarded and perfectly functional in today's society. It is still used in some machinegun matches.
__________________
NRA Certified Instructor: Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Home Safety, Personal Protection, Range Safety Officer

NRA Life Member
Hkmp5sd is offline  
Old December 24, 2002, 12:06 AM   #4
guy sajer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 7, 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 328
Even the simplified M1 and M1A1 would require a substantial amount of machining . However , with modern computerized methods and programs , I don't think it would be a big problem .

I think the MP5 shoulders and points easier and more naturally than a TSMG . Also , allows for quicker mag changes as stated earlier . The sights are more adjustable is true , but the fixed TSMG sights are well regulated out to 50 yds .


Given the chance to trade my 1942 Savage M1 for any modern smg , I'd keep my Thompson .
guy sajer is offline  
Old December 24, 2002, 10:15 AM   #5
Double Eagle
Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2000
Posts: 17
Thanks guys...
__________________
RQ
---------------

"A warrior may choose pacifism. Others are condemned to it."
Double Eagle is offline  
Old December 28, 2002, 03:08 PM   #6
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 16,762
Expensive to manufacture (machine) and weight prohibitive. 10 lbs for a 45 ACP smg is a lot compared to a plastic HK UMP.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is online now  
Old December 28, 2002, 05:39 PM   #7
Schuey2002
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 21, 2002
Posts: 854
Quote:
... 10 lbs for a 45 ACP smg is a lot compared to a plastic HK UMP.
Exactly! A HK UMP .45 only weighs 4.93 lbs.(w/o a magazine).
Schuey2002 is offline  
Old December 31, 2002, 08:15 PM   #8
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 16,762
Psst... The Blish lock was deleted in the military version. It wasn't needed and it saved time & $.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is online now  
Old December 31, 2002, 08:31 PM   #9
JackNKoch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 1999
Posts: 185
I've read recently that the Thompson is much more reliable with FMJ than with hollowpoints. This may be of little concern to some but I hope newer designs are better at feeding the best available defense ammo. I have fired a couple hundred rounds from both a Thompson SMG and a MP5. I would love to be able to legally own either one in my home state. The MP5 would be my first choice, however. Happy New Year!
JackNKoch is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07148 seconds with 7 queries