The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 15, 2002, 10:01 PM   #1
Kcustom45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 146
Muzzle loader question

I have been thinking about getting a muzzle loader so that I can extend my hunting season. I don't know if it would be better to get a .50 cal or a .45 cal. I am kinda looking at the T/C Omega, because I like the "Falling Block" action. If anyone has any advice on which caliber or another good gun, let me know. Thanks in advance.
Kcustom45 is offline  
Old December 15, 2002, 10:54 PM   #2
Kcustom45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 146
I forgot to mention that almost all shots should be within 100 yards with many being within 50 yards. And that I am kinda already leaning toward the 50 cal, because I don't really agree with the "Velocity kills" idea. That being said I also remember seeing or reading somewhere that the .45 was not a great choice if your shots were going to be in close, but it was a long time ago and I wasn't even thinking of getting of muzzle loader at the time so I skimmed over it. Unfortunately it took an unprofitable season to get me thinking about getting a muzzle loader, but such is life.
Kcustom45 is offline  
Old December 16, 2002, 12:50 AM   #3
Guyon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 27, 2000
Location: Over the Hills and Through the Woods, Tennessee
Posts: 1,207
For shots 100 yards and in, I'd go 50 caliber. In fact, I did. There's really no need for the flatter trajectory of the .45 at that range, and you have more energy at impact with the .50.

Also, in a pinch, it's just easier to find ammo and accessories in .50 caliber.
__________________
Gun control should just be about hitting your target.
Guyon is offline  
Old December 16, 2002, 10:07 AM   #4
CD1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2000
Posts: 300
I use a Knight in-line. Very accurate and reliable. Very easy to use and clean. I shoot a .50 caliber, very effective on the deer that I've shot with it.

I don't know anything about .45 cal, or the Omega.
CD1 is offline  
Old December 16, 2002, 12:01 PM   #5
scotjute
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 2001
Location: texas
Posts: 259
I'd recommend the .50. It was a favorite caliber of its day and its probably the most popular today. Bullets, accessories, etc are readily available.
scotjute is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 09:34 PM   #6
JosephBoeckner
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2001
Location: KS
Posts: 159
id recommend the 50 caliber...a bigger hole means a bigger wound so better kills-stuff is more readily available..and you can probably get it cheaper and the supplies cheaper....and get better performance
JosephBoeckner is offline  
Old December 19, 2002, 10:54 PM   #7
BIGR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2000
Location: Mountains
Posts: 1,247
Go with the .50 CAL. Puts those deer down quick. I was lucky enough to get my hands on a new T/C .50 CAL. Omega before muzzleloading season got started. The first shot on the hunt claimed a nice deer. I like the way the gun functions and I think it will be my muzzleloader of choice the rest of my hunting career. It took a little getting used to a hammer again but it sure does have an easy trigger pull. I think the Omega will survive well in pouring rain and fire when called upon.
BIGR is offline  
Old December 19, 2002, 11:58 PM   #8
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,540
For round ball, a .50 is 37% heavier than a .45.

Remember that, historically, a .40 was a "squirrel rifle".

, Art
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old December 20, 2002, 02:08 AM   #9
blackopsglock
Member
 
Join Date: October 6, 2002
Posts: 50
Art,

I might have to disagree with you there.At least from a historical point.

In the 1700's during the f@I and the american revolution bores where very large.Towards the end of the war and after the war the bores started getting smaller.There where several reasons for that.1st people found that they could stretch their lead longer with samaller diameter round balls.Also they could stretch the life of powder because the smaller bores took less powder.Later in history bores started getting bigger again when buffalo hunting became popular.Lots of buffs where killed just to keep the indians from having food and coats.I also suspect that bores became bigger again because no one in that day and age threw away a perfectly good rifle just because riffling was wore out.They just reamed it into a larger caliber.

It was only later in history after all of this was settled out that the 40 cal became the squirrel caliber as it is know for today.

At least that's the way I understand it.
blackopsglock is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07435 seconds with 7 queries