The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 13, 2002, 01:02 PM   #1
Alan R
Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2001
Posts: 34
Ruger M77's...are they all the same?

In other words, are all M77's MKII's? If not, what are the differences and how do I go about identifying these differences?

Thanks and God Bless.
Alan R is offline  
Old August 13, 2002, 01:21 PM   #2
Gary H
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 26, 2000
Location: California
Posts: 2,254
Don't know the answer to your question, but I have a MII target version that has an incredible out of the box trigger and shoots very small groups. From all the negative comments that I have read about this rifle line, I would say that they do differ in some major ways.
Gary H is offline  
Old August 13, 2002, 01:56 PM   #3
MeekAndMild
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 2, 2001
Posts: 4,988
The old style with the thumb safety on the tang is the one I have. It shoots very well, amazingly well.
MeekAndMild is offline  
Old August 13, 2002, 01:57 PM   #4
scottaz
Member
 
Join Date: March 25, 2001
Location: Cave Creek AZ
Posts: 18
One of the differences is that the origanals had the tang safety, whille the newer MkII's have the 3-position wing safety, someone correct me if im wrong. There may be other diiferences as well but i dont know of any.
Scott
scottaz is offline  
Old August 13, 2002, 04:32 PM   #5
Omaha-BeenGlockin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2001
Location: U.S.S.A.
Posts: 918
I think the older ones were push feed and not controlled round feed/claw extractor.
__________________
I take the leech that's bleeding me
Can't stop to save my soul
I take the leash that's leading me
-------Metallica
Omaha-BeenGlockin is offline  
Old August 13, 2002, 08:43 PM   #6
dZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: Exiled, Fetid Swamp, DC
Posts: 7,548
the mark ones have an adjustable trigger

the mark twos have a fiddle proof trigger
__________________
"O tell the Lacedomecians to damn the torpedoes."
BOTR, Chapter V: Some Monsters
dZ is offline  
Old August 14, 2002, 03:43 PM   #7
Poodleshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 7, 2000
Location: Floating down the James River in VA
Posts: 2,535
M77MkII- push feed-claw extractor (not controlled feed), comes in stainless steel, 3 position Winchester style safety, non-adjustable trigger
M77-better finish (blued only), tang safety, adjustable trigger, non claw extractor
Both are nice rifles. I have a MkII in stainless steel, which is my "beater" deer rifle.
Poodleshooter is offline  
Old August 14, 2002, 05:06 PM   #8
S.F.S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2001
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 469
Poodleshooter,
The M77-MkII is controlled feed not push feed. And the target model has an adjustable two stage trigger.

Scott
__________________
My Wife Yes, My Dog Maybe, My Guns NEVER!!!
S.F.S is offline  
Old August 15, 2002, 10:43 AM   #9
TangSafetyM77
Junior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4
As you can tell from my handle, I'm partial to the older style M77's. I've never seen one that didn't shoot. Most of my bias subjective, but if you have the chance to handle one of the older models with the tang safety and the red rubber butt pad, do it. Then go to the gunstore and compare that to one of the new M77's. The bolts feel tinny and rough, the triggers are horrible. The metal to stock fit is spotty. I finally found one of the older tang saftey models at the last gun show in .243. The trigger is great and is adjusted to around 2 1/2 lbs, and it came with an old weaver K4. This rifle shoots inexpensive Winchester 100 grn power points into a cloverleaf at 100 yds. Even if the new Rugers are capable of that kind of accuracy, who could get them to shoot without an aftermarket trigger?
IMO, if you can find a well-kept older model, you will end up getting a much higher quality rifle for less money than a new one.
TangSafetyM77 is offline  
Old August 15, 2002, 11:41 AM   #10
Poodleshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 7, 2000
Location: Floating down the James River in VA
Posts: 2,535
Quote:
Poodleshooter,The M77-MkII is controlled feed not push feed.
My "controlled feed" MkII allows me to manually drop a round in the chamber, and close the bolt over it. When it feeds, it pushes the round into the chamber. The rim of the case is not encased by the claw extractor or controlled by the bolt during feeding, even when magazine fed. If I rotate the rifle upside down and attempt to magazine feed a round, it falls out. That doesn't happen with a Mauser. I maintain that that M77MkII is a push feed rifle with a claw extractor.
I do stand corrected on the trigger issue.
Poodleshooter is offline  
Old August 15, 2002, 03:02 PM   #11
Crimper-D
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2001
Location: The Bearflag Republic
Posts: 579
Got one of the old Tang safety models...

Red rubber buttplate, semi-butterknife bolthandle, externally adjustable trigger with a letoff about 2lbs. With a Redfield 6X scope it will kill California Groundsquirrels with headshots if I feed it reloads. It's a .243 and can do execution on the little rascals as far out as 200 yds.
The "Modern" M77's don't even look or feel like the same rifle
__________________
"It is evident that scepticism, while it makes no actual change in a man, always makes him feel better.".....H.L.Mencken
Crimper-D is offline  
Old August 15, 2002, 06:34 PM   #12
S.F.S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2001
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 469
Poodleshooter

I held my rifle upside down and the rounds did not fall out as I cycled the bolt (multiple times). The claw extractor totally covers the case rim on mine.
Even in Ruger's catalog it advertises it as controlled feed. I believe that the older models with the tang safety was a push feed with a claw extractor.
Maybe their is some sought of problem with your rifle?

Scott
__________________
My Wife Yes, My Dog Maybe, My Guns NEVER!!!

Last edited by S.F.S; August 15, 2002 at 07:02 PM.
S.F.S is offline  
Old August 15, 2002, 06:52 PM   #13
Alan R
Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2001
Posts: 34
Excellent information...thanks everyone.

God Bless,

Alan
Alan R is offline  
Old August 15, 2002, 08:17 PM   #14
hjk_rick
Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 20
The MKII was originally a push feed - since changed to controled feed to compete with Winchester. Thus solving the debate between Poodleshooter and S.F.S.

The capacity of the tang safety model was five rounds - the MKII holds four. Some like the slimmer gun.

The inletting of the tang safety was problematic for acuracy of the older guns.

Ruger's forty dollar rebate makes the MKII a very good deal right now!

Rick
hjk_rick is offline  
Old August 15, 2002, 09:41 PM   #15
MeekAndMild
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 2, 2001
Posts: 4,988
Why would you want to shoot upside down?
MeekAndMild is offline  
Old August 16, 2002, 10:37 AM   #16
Poodleshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 7, 2000
Location: Floating down the James River in VA
Posts: 2,535
Quote:
Why would you want to shoot upside down?
It's tactical

Thanks for the info hjk_rik! I had suspected that that was the case, as I have heard both accounts, but only know of my own experiences with my MKII. Any idea if it is possible to get a bolt retrofit for the slightly older MkII's like mine. I grew up using an M94 Swede Mauser and was used to controlled feed till I bought the MkII as my first deer rifle.
Poodleshooter is offline  
Old August 16, 2002, 09:24 PM   #17
hjk_rick
Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 20
Poodleshooter -

You should call Ruger. I'd be willing to bet that they will modify the bolt no charge. Let us know how you make out.

Rick
hjk_rick is offline  
Old August 26, 2002, 11:25 AM   #18
Poodleshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 7, 2000
Location: Floating down the James River in VA
Posts: 2,535
Some lady on the tech support line told me that they would replace the bolt and convert it to controlled feed........



For about $100! No thanks!
Poodleshooter is offline  
Old August 26, 2002, 06:00 PM   #19
hjk_rick
Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 20
Wow - did I misjudge that one. Is the bolt the only modification or do they need to alter the chamber also?

Sorry,
Rick
hjk_rick is offline  
Old August 26, 2002, 09:13 PM   #20
Poodleshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 7, 2000
Location: Floating down the James River in VA
Posts: 2,535
They said that they would completely switch out the bolts. I think that grinding the bottom lip off of the rifle might not work, as that would leave a gap below the head and rim. Maybe that would be a problem, maybe not. At any rate, it's not really worth the loss of my principal deer rifle for several weeks, and the $100+.
The rifle already went to Ruger back when I first got it, as the extractor was poorly tensioned. If it isn't broke, I'd rather not "fix" it.
Poodleshooter is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.12476 seconds with 9 queries