The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Competition Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 23, 2002, 01:27 PM   #1
DDGator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 148
DAO for IDPA?

I am supplementing my normal carry gun (Taurus 85 UL) with a larger autoloader for when weather and my mode of dress permits.

I like and have seen great deals on the CZ-100s -- which are a striker-fired DAO with the necessarily longer trigger pull.

In addition to carrying the gun -- I would like to get started shooting IDPA. My question is -- would I be hopelessly disadvantaged with a DAO only gun?

Anyone out there shooting DAO of any kind in the SSP division?
DDGator is offline  
Old September 23, 2002, 04:44 PM   #2
3 gun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 1999
Location: N41 24.283 W81 43.370 N.E.Ohio
Posts: 557
If you are going to carry the pistol in real life don't worry about how well it plays games. Get the one that fits your needs best and practice the game with it. The CZ 100 would fit in fine in an IDPA match. You will see a lot of Glocks and DAO pistols SSP.
__________________
Change you can believe in... Pre-65 US silver coins
NRA RSO & Certified Instructor in rifle, pistol, shotgun.
An unloaded pistol is a paperweight.
Opportunity knocks..Trouble kicks down the door.
3 gun is offline  
Old September 23, 2002, 05:35 PM   #3
bullseyekp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 2000
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 118
Hopelessly disadvantaged? Probably not.

I know nothing of the CZ100 other than it is a striker-fired, polymer CZ. That being said, I can tell you a little bit about DAO guns versus DA/SAs and SAs. My father and I started shooting IDPA at the same time. He started with a Ruger KP95DAO and I started with at Ruger KP95DC (decock). Within a year and a half or so, Dad bought a decock model to keep up. Then, about a year later, he switched to a Glock. I on the other hand, stayed with the decock model and still shoot it. One thing has changed in the past year or so, as I moved up from SS to MA, and that is the fact that I can actually shoot faster than the gun. I attribute a major portion of this to the trigger having a lengthy reset, and slow slide velocity unless I'm shooting really hot loads, which creates a recoil problem.

The point of my rambling is that I doubt you will be too disadvanted with the CZ100 until you can actually shoot faster than the gun. We can refer to the old saying, "It's not the gun, but the shooter," and then add "95% of the time." If you get to a point where you can shoot that well and you want to go further, buy a new gun that you know shoots faster than you. During the past two months, I have shot a friend's G34 on the last stage of a local IDPA match. In both instances, I shot the stage 2-4 seconds faster with his gun (including points down) on stages that only took 10-12 seconds with mine. And I have fired a total of about 35 rounds through that weapon. I'll be getting one later this fall.

One more thing you may want to consider. If you know someone with any kind of double action gun, even a revolver, shoot about 150 rounds through it (or dry fire 150 times) in one practice session and see how your hands and fingers feel. Some people, myself included, get tired of the double action pull really quick. Hence the reason I drop a 9mm bullet between the rear of my slide and my partially cocked hammer during extended dry fire practices.
bullseyekp is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06355 seconds with 7 queries