The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 16, 2002, 04:03 AM   #1
TABING
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 1999
Location: White Mountains, AZ & Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Posts: 662
Ruger Redhawk in 5.5 inch or 7.5 inch

I looking at both these revolvers and am trying to decide on barrel length, plan to use it for a field carry gun, not especially as a primary hunting gun. Tending toward a shorter, handier barrel length, and don't plan of putting a scope on it. sounds like I've answered my own question, but what's your opinions?

(I have a model 29 with 6" barrel, and a Desert Eagle with 6" barrel).
TABING is offline  
Old May 16, 2002, 04:49 AM   #2
Koveras
Member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, USA
Posts: 68
I have both the RH 5.5 and 7.5, and the 5.5 is considerably easier to pack around. But it is still a massive gun. From my experience with a 6" S&W M657, your 6" S&W M29 will be better than either of the Rugers for a gun to be carried more than shot. I like my Rugers, but I like my hip/shoulder/lower back better.

Just my opinion.
Koveras is offline  
Old May 16, 2002, 07:09 AM   #3
Scarborough
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 11, 2001
Location: Fargo North Dakota
Posts: 543
Have the 5.5'' gun. I like it. Used it for a bit of deer hunting last year. Get a good holster rig and you should be o.k. But as Koveras said, these are not going to carry quite as easy as the ''N'' frames.
Scarborough is offline  
Old May 16, 2002, 11:50 AM   #4
TABING
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 1999
Location: White Mountains, AZ & Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Posts: 662
Question, why would a 29 be easier to carry than a Redhawk, surely the weight is within a couple of onces, is the Redhawk that much bigger dimentionally?

When I say carry gun, to me that means I'll put at least 50-100 rounds of cast bullets in general plinking and rock busting in the desert on any one walk-about.

The reason I'm interested in the Redhawk is the option to use Garrett high powered rounds that are not recommended in anything but Redhawks.
TABING is offline  
Old May 16, 2002, 12:32 PM   #5
Jim T.
Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2002
Location: California
Posts: 57
Weight

A Smith Mtn. Gun as an example weighs about 39 oz. A 5.5" Redhawk per Ruger weighs 49 oz and the 7.5 is heavier. As a comparison using the old catalogues a 6" Anaconda is 53 oz. and a 6" Dan Wesson with the Vent Light shroud 53 oz. and 56 oz. with the Vent Heavy shroud. Per the current Smith catalog the standard 4" is about 41.5 oz. So there is close to a half pound difference Smith to Ruger. The diameter of the cylinder on the Ruger is larger, too.

Jim T.
Jim T. is offline  
Old May 16, 2002, 07:21 PM   #6
biere
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: tn
Posts: 502
I just got the 5.5 inch redhawk as I figured if I was just working on my property it is plenty, I got the 44 magnum.

I also figured if hunting, it would most likely be the second gun so 2 more inches would be more uncomfortable.

I sort of considered weight, but I dislike tales of new smiths and their longevity. Rugers are built like a tank and I consider it weight lifting. I did see a used smith in 44 mag, but I just liked the ruger grip better.

I figure if I ever want one just for hunting I would most likely get another one with a longer barrel. I am not after a revolver to cover every single possability.
biere is offline  
Old May 16, 2002, 07:49 PM   #7
C.R.Sam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 1999
Location: Dewey, AZ
Posts: 12,859
5½"

Sam
C.R.Sam is offline  
Old May 18, 2002, 05:11 AM   #8
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,270
STUPID BULLET TRICKS

The bullet will not care if its launch tube is 7.5" or 5.5".

At least not enough to matter....................

I can get MORE than enough from my 'shorties'; what more can 2" actually add?
NOT THEORY -- test data only.
__________________
.
"all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo"
WESHOOT2 is offline  
Old May 18, 2002, 10:47 AM   #9
Edward429451
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
Used to own the 5.5", Got stolen.
Now own the 7.5", no complaints.

Do I miss the 5.5"? You bet. Would I trade in the 7.5" for a 5.5"? No, but I'd buy another 5.5"!

Like Weshoot2 said, would a perp, animal or JBT know the difference? NO...
Edward429451 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07881 seconds with 7 queries