The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old February 13, 2002, 11:09 PM   #1
Birdhunter
Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2002
Location: Midlothian IL
Posts: 70
What's wrong with Ruger

Boston T. Party always says Bill Ruger is not pro 2nd amendment. How is that possible when you own a firearms co.? A buddy of mine ragged on me for buying a Ruger, but wouldn't get specific as to why. Did they cut some kind of deal with the gov.? I never heard of anything like that, maybe someone can give me the rundown. I would hate to support a company like that.
Birdhunter is offline  
Old February 13, 2002, 11:29 PM   #2
deej
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2002
Location: Silicon Valley, (Occupied) California Republic
Posts: 226
The Ruger company supported the 10 round magazine limit.

Pinched this off of www.gunnery.net/news/Goodbye-BillnBill.html

Quote:
Want to know why I hate Bill Ruger and will never own a Sturm Ruger product?

Bill Ruger helped the antis prohibit so-called "Assault Weapons" and is the primary architect of the "evil features" that were effectively banned in Brady-2 and the "Assault Weapons Ban." "Evil" features selected not because they are truly evil or would have any effect on reducing crime, rather features selected simply because none of Ruger's guns had any of them. He is the author of the so-called "high capacity" [read full capacity] magazine ban, as well as several other loony anti-gun ideas. Yes friends, American arms manufacturer and machine-gun designer Bill Ruger is the anti-gun bastard who dreamed up the "10-round mag" idea.

He was filmed on television news with Tom Brokaw and said:

"No honest man needs more "than ten rounds in any gun," and "I never meant for simple civilians to have my twenty- or thirty-round mags or my folding stock."

and then said: "I see nothing wrong with waiting periods."

This TV interview was used (with Bill Ruger's written permission) over and over again to rub our faces in the fact that "even a gun manufacturer thinks gun control is good."

Need more proof? The following is an excerpt from the March 30, 1989 letter Bill Ruger sent to every member of Congress. It is in the Congressional Record and has been reprinted in several newspapers and magazines.

"The best way to address the firepower concern is therefore not to try to outlaw or license many millions of older and perfectly legitimate firearms (which would be a licensing effort of staggering proportions) but to prohibit the possession of high capacity magazines.

By a simple, complete and unequivocal ban on large capacity magazines, all the difficulty of defining 'assault rifle' and 'semi-automatic rifles' is eliminated. The large capacity magazine itself, separate or attached to the firearm, becomes the prohibited item.
A single amendment to Federal firearms laws could effectively implement these objectives."

William B. Ruger
Sturm, Ruger Firearms

[ This letter was taken from the American Handgunner magazine, dated Sept 1992, page 18 ]
DJ
__________________
"Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument."

- Chief Justice Marshall, Marbury v. Madison
deej is offline  
Old February 13, 2002, 11:33 PM   #3
croyance
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 30, 2001
Posts: 3,604
Was it not Bill Ruger who said that no honest man needs more than 10 rounds?
croyance is offline  
Old February 13, 2002, 11:35 PM   #4
rock_jock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2000
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 1,779
In 1994, Bill Ruger testified to Congress for the Crime Bill in favor of the 10-round capacity limit for magazines. Supposedly, he said something to the effect of "no citizen needs more than 10 rounds in a gun." Not a very nice thing to do the gunowners of the U.S. Some people defend BR saying that he was really trying to thwart a 5-round limit. I don't know all the facts and I am sure someone can fill in the details.
rock_jock is offline  
Old February 13, 2002, 11:47 PM   #5
blades67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 1999
Location: Chandler, Arizona, USA
Posts: 6,014
He's not dead yet.:barf:
__________________
Guns cause crime like spoons cause Rosie O'Donnell to be fat!

I hunt, therefore I am.
blades67 is offline  
Old February 13, 2002, 11:57 PM   #6
Birdhunter
Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2002
Location: Midlothian IL
Posts: 70
Thanks for the info guys, in '92 I was in high school too busy chasin' females, missed the Brokaw interview
Birdhunter is offline  
Old February 14, 2002, 11:57 AM   #7
Futo Inu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 1999
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Posts: 3,624
Thank you!

Any questions?

BOYCOTT RUGER UNTIL THE COMPANY THAT MADE BILL RUGER RICH IS INTRUMENTAL IN REPEALING THE USEFUL DEFENSIVE WEAPONS BAN OF 1994!!!!!!!!! (or preventing is re-passage after sunset)
__________________
"You are NOT Joseph's father, Hank. You are not supposed to take over until Dale is gunned down by federal agents - that is the agreement." --Peggy
Futo Inu is offline  
Old February 14, 2002, 12:28 PM   #8
Ben Swenson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2000
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,211
I thought Ruger wanted a 15 round maximum limit because that was the most any of his handguns took.

Regardless, doom on you, Slick Willy Ruger.
Ben Swenson is offline  
Old February 14, 2002, 12:29 PM   #9
KSFreeman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2001
Location: Lafayette, Indiana--American-occupied America
Posts: 5,416
Blades, when Billy does buy the farm, it's a 6 of Rolling Rock to go for me. I'll probably have to stand in line but that will give me time to drink it and meet other TFL members. Ruger cannot go broke fast enough.
KSFreeman is offline  
Old February 14, 2002, 12:37 PM   #10
KP95DAO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2000
Posts: 699
As I posted some time ago on the Ruger Forum: Some times when people get older they say silly things. The problem as I see it is that the Ruger sons did not contradict their father. I buy and use their products and reccommend them to others.

If I remember correctly Ronald Reagan said some silly stuff after leaving office and put up with that Bitch, Sara Brady and her unfortunate husband after he was shot.

And, wasn't it Pres. George Bush who signed the full auto domestic sale ban for new guns in 1988 or there abouts?

Adapt, drive on, and overcome.
KP95DAO is offline  
Old February 14, 2002, 12:56 PM   #11
KSFreeman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2001
Location: Lafayette, Indiana--American-occupied America
Posts: 5,416
KP95, nope, it was Ronny Raygun that signed the FOPA of `86 (gee, thanks NRA). Black Tuesday is May 19, 1986. No more Form 1s. Georgie Herbert gave us a EO in March 1989 that suddenly decided certain sporting rifles were not sporting afterall.

It was Raygun that gave Kalifornia its first gun control.

Ruger is a nest of traitors. You punish traitors or they will cut you again. We should not forgive Johnny bin Walker, but prosecute him. Further, Ruger must be driven into bankruptcy. I cannot support or recommend a traitor to my liberty.
KSFreeman is offline  
Old February 14, 2002, 05:02 PM   #12
Salt
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2001
Posts: 673
I think Bill Ruger was just trying to do some damage control by supporting a 10rd magazine limit so as to avert an even worse 5 round magazine limit.
Salt is offline  
Old February 14, 2002, 05:25 PM   #13
Futo Inu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 1999
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Posts: 3,624
KP, his sons taking over has got nothing to do with whether a boycott should continue, until specific affirmative helpful RKBA action is taken by Ruger the company to disavow the prior acts and undo them. :barf: Who's in charge at Ruger is no more relevant than whether Schultz is in charge at *&*. The only way to "overcome" a continual sellout of rights is to punish the wrongdoers economically; you are doing quite the opposite - rewarding active complicity in the infringement of our rights. It would be much simpler if you and the other folks with their heads in the sand, just admit that you are not principled on this issue, or that you love the guns so much that your personal satisfaction is more important the our long-term rights. Then we could move on to different conversation. But when you pretend that Ruger the company did nothing wrong, you distort the issue unfairly for those who have not yet made up their minds. I say, please admit you are simply unprincipled on the issue of using your money to promote rather than hinder our rights, OR stay silent altogether on the issue, and let those of us who are principled, counsel the noobs. Thank you. My BP should go down in an hour or so....
Futo Inu is offline  
Old October 9, 2011, 08:25 PM   #14
jdthaddeus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 1999
Location: Az
Posts: 470
IIRC, Ruger wanted the ban to be on 15 rounds to get rid of his competition in the Glock 17, in favor of Ruger's P-85. But he got, us, shafted worse when they dropped it to 10 rounds.

I am not sure if he sold us out for profit, to squash his competition.

Smith and Wesson didn't treat us much better several years after that.

One thing is for certain: Pro-RKBA people never forget, and we vote, at the cash register as well as the ballot box.
jdthaddeus is offline  
Old October 9, 2011, 08:42 PM   #15
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 36,074
For God's sakes, this is a 9 year old thread!

There's NO reason to resurrect this one.

__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09661 seconds with 7 queries