|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 19, 2014, 08:40 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2013
Location: Clarksville, Tennessee
Posts: 365
|
|
April 19, 2014, 09:30 AM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2010
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 1,049
|
Quote:
BLC2 for .308 A basic search here would have gotten you the info you wanted.
__________________
Member: Orange Gunsite Family, NRA--Life, ARTCA, and American Legion. Caveat Emptor: Cavery Grips/AmericanGripz/Prestige Grips/Stealth Grips from Clayton, NC. He is a scammer |
|
April 19, 2014, 09:31 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
|
Agree with HP38 and Universal for light to medium loads in the magnum and full range in the Specials. Universal will get you to slightly higher velocities.
H110 is great for maximum velocity in the magnum but you are not suppose to download it more than 3%, so N110 would be good to fill in between top end Universal and below H110. Several good powders for .308. I would start with BL-C2 (ball powder) which was used for military loads. And Varget or H4895 the 150 gr bullets, both short stick powders. For heavier bullets H4350 would be good to try. |
April 19, 2014, 10:03 AM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Thanks to those who have answered so far.
HP38 and Universal are the only ones that have come up regularly that the shop sells. I may have to ask about H110: seems too good not to try! For the .308, only one seems to be sold (I don't remember seeing the BL-C2 powder): H4895, so I may try it or N140 next. Those who have shot it say it is very good for .308... Quote:
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
|
April 19, 2014, 10:24 AM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
|
Quote:
IMR4227, while it is not a Hodgdon powder per se, is still distributed by them and if available, an excellent powder for .44 mag, especially in long piped revolvers and carbines. |
|
April 19, 2014, 10:32 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
|
yeah, i am not sure where the 3% thing comes from for H110, does that mean from the starting load or from the max? because they list loads where the spread is more than 11% between min and max, my favorite carbine load is about 15% from max, but thats using a 20inch barrel, maybe that takes the 3% rule out of play
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed |
April 19, 2014, 11:47 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Not sure what is meant by this "3%" issue.
Can someone explain? Please use simple english and type slowly so I can keep up!!
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
April 19, 2014, 12:31 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
|
They're talking about the percentage of charge weight reduction from the published MAX.
Which I find backwards, as I try to determine a safe 'Start' load, then work my way up.
__________________
. "all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo" |
April 19, 2014, 01:04 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Quote:
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
|
April 20, 2014, 10:53 AM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
James: I am not up on what is progressive and non, so go with the ohter, but I think H110 is old school plain powder.
Quote:
I don't mind answering in the least James questions or at least what I can. And those two powders are opinions not facts and it helps to have conversations in regards to the OPs specific request in comparisons on the VV powders he is shooting. |
|
April 20, 2014, 11:20 AM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
|
I too do not know what a progressive powder is. H110/W296 have a narrow parameter, but within that parameter work very well. They are clean burning, measure extremely well thru a powder thrower and are impossible to double charge in a magnum case. They are also extremely safe and accurate when used at published charges.
|
April 20, 2014, 12:33 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
To clear it up, I know what a progressive powder is, I just am not postive that H-110 is not (I don't think so but............) It was made well before progresvie powders came into existence.
The progressive powders burn at different rates as the mix goes boom in the cartridge (hopefully) As such they have a longer pressure dwell time but at a lower peak than normal powders. |
April 20, 2014, 02:11 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
The term progressive as I used it was from another thread in which a member described N110 as very progressive.
That is to say that the increase in pressure, compared to the increase in charge, was linear and predictable meaning that when working with unlisted component combinations (as I often seem to be), the likelihood of unpleasant pressure spikes. I tell you... From the point of view of a novice reloader, that is gold dust!! H110 still sounds very interesting, despite the technical challenges. I'll have to see if they can order!
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
|
|