|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 4, 2014, 01:04 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2011
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 421
|
Ruger SRH 454 7.5" dropped?
I just checked Ruger's website and this revolver is no longer cataloged. It was on my short list for a DA 45 and now it's dropped. Looks like I'm going to have to buy used or get a Taurus. If I have to go the used route I might as well do a hard target search for a 7.5" Redhawk in 45 Colt, which would really be my first choice. Ruger needs to get their new plant in the Carolinas up and running and bring back some of their discontinued guns!
|
February 4, 2014, 05:12 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2008
Posts: 560
|
Not dropped. The only list the revolvers currently in production. Since guns are made in batches the models roll in and out all the time.
|
February 11, 2014, 02:23 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Is that why all the Redhawk models are presently not listed?
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
February 11, 2014, 08:43 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2008
Posts: 560
|
Yep.
The Redhawk is slated to enter production this month at their new plant in SC. That reminds me. I need to call and see if they can knock out another 7.5" 45 Colt RH to replace mine. |
February 11, 2014, 09:37 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2011
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
|
|
February 12, 2014, 01:34 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
A .45 Colt RH would be an interesting proposition for me too.
I hear good things about the .45 round particularly that, from the right platform (A RH in this case) it can achieve ".44Mag and beyond" performance whilst also being tunable to light loads. Sounds very versatile.
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
February 12, 2014, 09:17 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2008
Posts: 560
|
My RH has a bit of an issue with the frame. The hammer pin hole is not round. That allows the hammer to lean to the left when it falls. The gun goes BANG every time but it drags the hammer on the frame.
My gun was built in late 2012 so it must have been a distributor special kind of thing. |
February 12, 2014, 08:19 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2011
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 421
|
I just checked Ruger's website and they are again cataloging the SRH in 454 with 7.5" barrel, although now it is listed before the 44 Mags and is tagged as NEW. Another example that there is never anything really new under the sun. The Redhawk is still not catalogued though
http://www.ruger.com/products/superR...rd/models.html |
February 12, 2014, 08:45 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Posts: 111
|
feets -
you can fix (or try to fix) the problem with your RH hammer dragging on the frame with shims. Go to triggershims.com and get some Redhawk shims for both the hammer and trigger pins. I've put these on my redhawks and my GP-100 and I really like them. You do need some mechanical aptitude to install these. If you're comfortable dropping the hammer and trigger assembly out, it's easy to do. Or just let your gunsmith do it. |
February 12, 2014, 11:17 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2008
Posts: 560
|
Ralph, I have trigger shims. Those will not fix this problem.
The hole for the pin is not round. The pin gets pushed down by the force of the hammer spring. This pulls the hammer out of alignment. Take a look at the pic. There are a couple other things that keep the gun from being perfect so to speak. Ruger just opened a new assembly line in a new state. I'd like to see if they have the 45 Colt chambers the correct size these days. My SRH in 454 is great but the RH is tight. |
February 13, 2014, 09:42 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Posts: 111
|
I see it now. Thanks for the picture. My 45 Redhawk has some "tooling marks" around that hole from sloppy machining or a dull drill but the hole is round.
I also had to send my cylinder out for reaming. |
February 13, 2014, 07:37 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2008
Posts: 560
|
If the replacement needs attention I'll do it myself. That out of round hole is the only reason I haven't put any real effort into this gun.
I worked over the Super Redhawk. It's single action is on par with my heavily worked S&W 25-2. I'd like to see what I can do with the Redhawk platform but it's not worth the trouble if the gun is going to be exchanged on Ruger's dime. BTW... I called again today and the Redhawk is not on the production schedule yet. It's very rare for their customer service folks to know what the production forecast looks like so I'll call again in a couple weeks. |
February 13, 2014, 09:58 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2011
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 421
|
Keep us updated on what you find out, feets. I'd love to see the 7.5" 45 Colt Redhawk back in production.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|