|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 26, 2006, 11:20 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 2005
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 401
|
Burris Fullfield II scopes? Any Good?
I have been looking for a shorty-scope for my 35 Remington levergun. Basically I have found only a couple that really fit the bill: the Burris Fullfield II 1.75 -5 scope and the Leupold VXIII 1.5 - 5.
Cost: Burris: $185 Leupold: $400. I don't need anyone to tell me the Leupold VXIII is the better scope. I know that. I just really don't have any desire to spend $400 on a scope! So What I want to know is, are the Burris scopes any good? by good, I mean clear, good low light useage while being durable.
__________________
Robert N. "Remember, Eagles may soar but Weasels don't get sucked into jet engines!" |
July 27, 2006, 12:26 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2006
Posts: 1,559
|
The Burris Fullfield ll is a great scope. It has a 95% light transmission for brightness, which is much better than most scopes. The Leupold VX1 & VXll are in the 87-90%.
The Burris will handle recoil as I have one on a 300 WSM and a 338 WM and have not had a problem with either one. Check ebay and you can get one from some dealers for about $155-$165. Highly recommend the Burris. |
|
|