|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 11, 2009, 09:31 PM | #1 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,053
|
Wolves are causing big problems in Idaho.
All of these comments were made by Idaho hunters.
___________________________________________ Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
These are some of the comments some of my friends have made concerning wolves here in Idaho. So, please don't tell me wolves aren't dangerous. Here is a comment about specific places where elk and deer used to be abundant: Quote:
So, if you're planning a trip into Idaho's back country, you better be packin heat! ---------------------------------------------------
__________________
There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time." - General George Patton Jr |
|||||
March 11, 2009, 09:42 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 6, 2008
Posts: 496
|
this shoudl bea warning to anyone camping anywhere. this weird weather we've been havign nationwide is gonna cause soem weird things with animals
|
March 11, 2009, 10:01 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
Anecdotal evidence is not quite on the same level as scientific evidence. If I'm supposed to live in fear I need something concrete to go on.
|
March 11, 2009, 10:21 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,053
|
Quote:
__________________
There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time." - General George Patton Jr |
|
March 11, 2009, 10:38 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2005
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
|
Wolves have been hammering the deer herds in the Methow Valley for the past 3-4 years, and these idiots think it's "great news" that the wolves are back.
http://www.conservationnw.org/wildli...-in-the-methow
__________________
Just my 2¢. |
March 11, 2009, 10:55 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 240
|
Yes and they will go on thinking it is great until they(wolves) start bringing down more live stock and then start on the human species . I am from the Pacific North West, I can tell you that they are nothing to mess around with. The packs of wild dogs/yotes was bad enough. Ever been chased by wild dogs? It's not very much fun,(still got the scars) thank god my dad had a rifle that day.
My dad has said that the tally around where he hunts was real low this year and several hunters stated hearing wolves.
__________________
Accuracy over volume |
March 11, 2009, 11:10 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 23, 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,126
|
That would be great Big Bill. Are you paying for the trip?
|
March 11, 2009, 11:22 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
|
In HS, our biology teacher (professor, since he also taught college), challenged the class to provide one DOCUMENTED case of a wolf attack on a human in N. America. We were unable to provide a single case.
Of course, 1962 was a ways back. Now days one has tremendous resources at his fingertips in the computer age for doing research. I did see a documentory (NG channel?) where a man was killed in Alaska, and it was kind of a 50/50 toss up as to whether he was killed by a bear or wolves. Both types of animals were known to feed at their local garbage dump at the research site, and both footprints were found near his body. There was, however, another documented instance of a hunter being attacked in another area. That fellow survived. If you're familiar with the National Geographic channel, you know there's no length to which they won't go to scientifically analyze the reason why animals attack humans--and always blame the humans. Get's comical at times. I guess there's no such thing as amimals being the predators and humans sometimes the prey. I'm personally skeptical of stories about wolf attacks, or of wolves bothering humans in the lower 48. That doesn't mean I wouldn't have concerns if there were wolves around--I'd be as nervous as anyone else. I'd be more concerned if there were grizzlies or even black bear in the neighborhood. Wolves following a hunter while packing out meat after a kill? Why? The pack would have the gut pile to themselves as well as the rest of the elk or deer not immediately packed out. A rifle shot during hunting season is a dinner bell for wolves or Grizzly in some places. The wolves aren't going to take your elk from you until you're gone. Not necessarily so with the Grizzly. Last edited by Nnobby45; March 11, 2009 at 11:44 PM. |
March 11, 2009, 11:36 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,053
|
Quote:
BTW Buzz! Are you in the Navy by chance? I've got a son down in Longview, maybe you could just catch a ride with him next time he comes home.
__________________
There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time." - General George Patton Jr |
|
March 12, 2009, 12:55 AM | #10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 8
|
"In HS, our biology teacher (professor, since he also taught college), challenged the class to provide one DOCUMENTED case of a wolf attack on a human in N. America. We were unable to provide a single case.
Of course, 1962 was a ways back." It's a little different nowadays as you said Nnobby45. http://www.mtexpress.com/index2.php?ID=2005119633 |
March 12, 2009, 01:12 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
Except for a couple people in the Air Force my family was all Army, untill my brother and I opted out. I was born on an Army base in Japan and that's as close to military service as I got.
I wish I could come camping out in the Idaho, heck anywhere. But I'll have to pass. Besides I'm not a scientist either, so if I end up as wolf poop it won't mean much Bill I remember when wolves were reintroduced back in the eighties. People started crying wolf then and they pretty much didn't stop no matter what. Most of the stories about depredation by wolves turned out to be just that, stories. So here we are 30 years later and people are still crying wolf. I'm not saying you don't have a valid argument, it's just that there have been so many false alarms that I need more than stories. Give me a link that ends in .gov or .edu, that's all I ask. |
March 12, 2009, 01:25 AM | #12 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 11,515
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 12, 2009, 01:47 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
http://www.trib.com/articles/2008/09...c70083d024.txt
Quote:
But I'd like to point out that 1,513 figure, that's only a couple hundred more animals than our yearly harvest of black bears in Washington. Over three big states that is. So even though the population is spread pretty wide it is also spread pretty thin, relative to other top predators. For example Oregon has an estimated 5100 cougars. http://www.dfw.state.or.us/wildlife/cougar/ Just as an aside I find the thought of being near a full sized mountain lion in the woods to be much scarier than a wolf. |
|
March 12, 2009, 01:52 AM | #14 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
PBP,
I don't see you in this section posting often so I will fill yer desire to see accounts of real encounters and/or attacks... http://www2.canada.com/theprovince/n...4-3f48d8df838b http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewa...f-verdict.html http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-col...lf-attack.html A rather long but detailed "official" summary of attacks... http://www.wc.adfg.state.ak.us/pubs/...chb13_full.pdf This should tide you over for a while... But here are some livestock attacks... http://www.boiseweekly.com/gyrobase/...d=oid%3A213125 http://www.agweekly.com/articles/200...ck/lvstk76.txt http://www.propertyrightsresearch.or...lf_attacks.htm Brent |
March 12, 2009, 01:57 AM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 11,515
|
A couple more anecdotal stories with no witnesses and another story where the experts do not believe it was awolf at all but "witnesses" say no bears where seen in the area. Another case of anecdotes and circumstance. Not much in the way of evidence there. In fact the one story even points out that "if" the story is true it is the first such account of humans being killed by healthy wolves. Nothingthat would survive any level of unbiased scrutiny at all.
|
March 12, 2009, 02:19 AM | #16 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
So my tales backed by photos of hogs causing injury to humans and dogs are likely more unbelievable to you I reckon since most folks KNOW piggies are timid little critters unable to cause injury and/or death to humans or even our hunting dogs especially those bulldogs we use?
I am way too far away from their habitat to have first hand knowledge of the wolf attacks but know of many ranchers who battle the financial losses of calving season. Heck, coyotes, while not normally attacking humans, are getting thick around here and I have personally seen many goat and calf kills and reduction of turkey populations in the last few years. Brent |
March 12, 2009, 07:28 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,714
|
You are still significantly more likely to be shot by a fellow hunter than you are to be attacked by a bear, mountain lion, and wolf, combined.
There is a reason the wilderness is called the wilderness. It isn't Disneyland. If you are out in the woods and calling in prey species to kill, expect to call in carnivores. D'uh! I did like the stories in the OP. The first three stories by "hunters" were all secondhand accounts - not even good anecdotes. The fourth was just a tale of what a guy does to keep his family safe. The fifth story is just a story about nature. Apparently the guy isn't happy about having some competition. Don't worry too much about the wolves killing off the deer herds. They are just getting used to the predatory pressures again and are learning to respond accordingly, as in Wisconsin.... http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/sports/442552 What I want to know is why folks aren't worried about these oh-so aggressive deer? They attack hunters, hikers, campers, and townfolk, etc. every year. This is one of the more under-reported types of events. Think of the shame about being a big old tough hunter and being chased down by Bambi's folks? Well, it isn't just the hunters who are at risk... http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/ar...news/302179996 http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/...ckval=GooglePM http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstrac...649D94679FD7CF (nice historic accounting) http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstra...D9415B898FF1D3 And some deer don't like to be shot by hunters... http://www.startribune.com/error/?pa...on&id=35323749 http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drm...740499,00.html http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstrac...679D94659FD7CF http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-14089820.html http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/...ckval=GooglePM http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/...ckval=GooglePM I am not sure there isn't more danger from deer than there is from wolves.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
March 12, 2009, 07:53 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2006
Location: Panama, Ok.
Posts: 660
|
When wild carnivores lose fear of people they become dangerous. When they are hungry, you're just a meal to them. When supposedly domesticated dogs like Rottweilers and Pit Bulls turn on people and sometimes kill them, there is no reason to believe a Wolf won't. Wild Carnivores are like guns. Always treat them like they are loaded.
|
March 12, 2009, 09:11 AM | #19 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
When a state's wolf population grows from 30 to 800 as was reported and then cited in a thread here, what didn't happen in 1962 is not really germane. Sure, odds are important, but the results of a high-odds event are much more important. Folks win lotteries, right? They say the Florida lottery's odds run some 14 million to one, against. Some lotteries, I don't want to win...
It ain't the odds so much as it is the results. No one anecdote is evidence. But when you add up anecdotes over a period of years and they're consistent, the new odds are that you'd better pay attention. Question: Why would a group of several wolves NOT attack a human, when a group of feral dogs will? (Some will try the, "But, Art, they learned that by being raised around humans." That merely shows ignorance about feral dogs. They're born and raised in the boonies as well as around people.) I live in the middle of a fair amount of cougar poop. They're around, and there have been four attacks up in Big Bend National Park. They've followed hikers on private land away from the park. But I don't live in fear of cougars. I am, however, judicious about where I walk and what I carry with me. I figure that if I turn on any predatory animal and do the yell-and-mock-charge thing, he better leave. If he stands his ground and shows any hostility, the odds are that he ain't leaving. Ever. I'll amble on about my business. My well-being is a lot more important to me than that of any critter on four legs--and a fair number of two-legs, for that matter. I dunno. Just like with people, I judge animals on their behavior. I've been around animals for danged near seventy years. Tame, feral and wild. I trust my judgement a heckuva lot more than I do that of some Willie-off-the-pickle-boat. Bottom line: Some knowledge is best gained vicariously, not first-hand. |
March 12, 2009, 09:29 AM | #20 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 8, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,769
|
Quote:
|
|
March 12, 2009, 09:57 AM | #21 | |
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 11,515
|
Quote:
You can stack as much manure as you like in a pile. At no point does it ever turn into ice cream. It is just a bigger pile of crap. Repeated common experiences can be reason to look into a situation, but when the facts do not back up the stories you have to go with the facts. In the case of wolves, certain people want to believe what they want to believe and do not bother themselves with the facts. PS: Of the things I mentioned, only bigfoot is real. Last edited by Playboypenguin; March 12, 2009 at 10:13 AM. |
|
March 12, 2009, 10:01 AM | #22 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 8, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,769
|
Quote:
|
|
March 12, 2009, 11:50 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: June 14, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 37
|
Wolves
Hi Big Bill, I don’t know about you, but I get tired of the opinions of people that don’t have wolves in their back yard telling me how good the wolves are. I think we need to reintroduce the wolves to the mountains of Southern CA or around NY. Maybe our new leader would like some around Chicago. We had two dogs killed not far from my house last weekend. I know many people that have lost animals to wolves. No a human has not been killed YET. If people want wolves, they need to keep them around their house.
Willis |
March 12, 2009, 12:19 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,676
|
Is it it problem? Not necessarily so.
Farmers think one deer in their field is a problem. Insurance companies believe one car/deer accident is a problem. Cattlemen think one mountain lion is a problem. Deer hunters think one wolf is a problem. Chicken farmers think one weasel is a problem. City dwellers think one coon in their trash is a problem. People with cedar shake shingles think one squirrel is a problem. Etc, Etc, Etc. Are we suppose to go out and kill off every critter that causes an issue for someone? Heck no. Where do we stop. 1500-2000 wolves in an area the size of Montana, Wy. and Idaho is not a problem. 5 times that number may not even be a problem. I'm not smart enough to know and I don't live their. But it will take more than a 1/2 dozen, or 20, or even 100 reports like the ones stated here to have me believe it's a problem. |
March 12, 2009, 12:26 PM | #25 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
killkenny, What must be taken into account over the number in a state the size of montana is poulation density in critical areas.
One drunk driver on the desolate back woods road at 4 am is not so much a problem as one drunk driver in a school zone 15 minutes after final bell... The problem wolves present me is knowing I am gonna have to listen to Mrs.hogdogs griping at rising beef prices as these wolves continue to prey on the beef industry... Brent |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|