The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 7, 2010, 02:34 PM   #1
kkb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2004
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 403
What wildcat is this?

While picking up my brass at the range I'll go ahead and grab most anything else around, if just to see what other folks are shooting.

I came across a pile of brass stamped 30-30 Win but the necks had been expanded to the point where they're now straight-walled cartridges with a length of ~2 inches and a mouth diameter a little under .4 inch.

What the heck are they?
kkb is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 03:48 PM   #2
270winforlife
Member
 
Join Date: February 1, 2010
Posts: 40
theres a bunch of possibilities, but one that comes to mind is the "35-30/30" which is a 30-30 necked up to accept a 35 caliber bullet, and has been around as a "wildcat" since around 1900 as per the Cartridges of the World Book by Frank Barnes. There is also a "35-30/30 Ackley Improved" wildcat cartridge that is much less popular. For the 35-30/30 there is still a slight shoulder, but not much. If there is no shoulder and it is completely blown out, appearing straight and if you measurement of the opening is around .4, maybe its a 30-30 win blown out to accept a .338 bullet, .375 bullet or a .416 bullet...three of the most popular bullet sizes. I think you may want to get one of these cartridges books and try to match it up if youre still curious, or post a picture of it and I'll try for you. Enjoy reloading.
270winforlife is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 04:04 PM   #3
Sevens
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
My guess is that they aren't wildcats at all, but rather some goofs either mistakenly or intentionally shooting the wrong ammo in a rifle with a chamber (and/or barrel) larger than .30-30.

My reasoning is simple-- folks that wildcat have to either buy their brass and handload it, or FORM their own brass and handload it. You can't get ammo for a wildcat without doing that unless you have a buddy that will load it. (I'm sure there are some small boutique reloading "firms" out there that will...)

Nobody who shoots a wildcat chucks brass all over a range and leaves it there.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss.
Sevens is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 04:40 PM   #4
bedlamite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2000
Location: WI
Posts: 1,395
That sounds like a .375 Winchester.

__________________
A plan is just a list of things that doesn't happen.
bedlamite is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 05:38 PM   #5
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Agree, it could be 375 Winchester, but 38-55 has almost the same dimensions as the 375 Winchester. Could be either one.

Quote:
maybe its a 30-30 win blown out to accept a .338 bullet, .375 bullet or a .416 bullet...three of the most popular bullet sizes.
I could be wrong, but I don't think I have ever seen a wildcat based on the 30-30 that will accept a .416" bullet. Probably because the base of the cartridge is about that size . . .
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 05:45 PM   #6
bedlamite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2000
Location: WI
Posts: 1,395
Scorch, the 38-55 was the first one I thought of, but it's .470" at the base the OP didn't mention a bulge.
__________________
A plan is just a list of things that doesn't happen.
bedlamite is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 08:20 PM   #7
kkb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2004
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 403
That .375 looks like it might be it. None of them have a bulge, but most of them have what looks like a hot-spot/burn mark close to the mouth. Don't know it that is from firing or from a bad annealing job or what.

Last edited by kkb; January 1, 2013 at 04:40 PM.
kkb is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 10:17 PM   #8
270winforlife
Member
 
Join Date: February 1, 2010
Posts: 40
agreed, its not the 35-30/30 after looking at your pictures, definately looks like a straightwall or slightly inset.
270winforlife is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 10:24 PM   #9
Jbar4Ranch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 1999
Location: Near Helena, Montana
Posts: 1,719
.38-55

The burn marks are from annealing.
__________________
Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets replaced...

SASS 47015
Jbar4Ranch is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 11:34 PM   #10
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Quote:
the 38-55 was the first one I thought of, but it's .470" at the base
No, it's the same case head size as 30-30.

The burn marks are from annealing or mild loads not completely sealing the chamber.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 11:41 PM   #11
Loader9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 29, 2008
Posts: 949
That's what 30-30 brass is going to look like if it is incorrectly fired in a 38-55. I had a guy next to me at a local range that couldn't get his 85 Hiwall to group at all. It was chambered in 38-55 but he was shooting handloads of 30-30 time after time after time until he shot probably 40 rounds thru it. He asked if I had any ideas for him. When I looked at the ammo he was shooting it was obvious that this long time shooter had made a major goof. It happens to even the best of us.
Loader9 is offline  
Old February 8, 2010, 01:00 AM   #12
Sport45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 25, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,196
I make .375Win brass from .30-30 by using a few grains of fast pistol powder under a case full of corn meal topped by a bit of bar soap. They blow out just like the case you've described.

.375Win and .38-55 are not common cartridges. I'm surprised someone would go to the trouble of fire forming that brass just to leave it laying on the ground. It may well be that someone put some .30-30 through one of those guns not knowing what he was doing.
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter.

Last edited by Sport45; February 8, 2010 at 01:09 AM.
Sport45 is offline  
Old February 8, 2010, 08:28 AM   #13
bedlamite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2000
Location: WI
Posts: 1,395
Scorch, if that's the case then the Hornady manual is wrong.
__________________
A plan is just a list of things that doesn't happen.
bedlamite is offline  
Old February 8, 2010, 11:32 AM   #14
jimkim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2008
Location: middle GA
Posts: 326
The 38-55 case does not have a .470" base. It has a .421" base. The 30-30 was based on the 38-55, and 38-55 brass can be readily formed from it. The 38-40 has a .470" base.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cd3030winchester.jpg (19.3 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg cd3855.jpg (15.0 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg cd3840winchester.jpg (23.4 KB, 10 views)
__________________
Jan. 4, 2007 gasoline $2.10 gal....HMMM?

Last edited by jimkim; February 8, 2010 at 03:35 PM.
jimkim is offline  
Old February 8, 2010, 12:40 PM   #15
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Quote:
Scorch, if that's the case then the Hornady manual is wrong
OK, so I guess the Hornady manual is wrong! What version do you have? In my Hornady manual (7th Edition), it's shown correctly.
Quote:
That's what 30-30 brass is going to look like if it is incorrectly fired in a 38-55.
That could be, too!
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old February 8, 2010, 01:26 PM   #16
kkb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2004
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 403
Okay.

Assuming it's an intentional sizing I'm getting swayed to the .38-55 camp. In Hornady's 6th edition they list a base diameter of .419", Lyman's 48th says .4191" (close enough ) max, I'm measuring .415". Also I'm not seeing the cylindrical section at the mouth of a .375 but rather a straight taper from base to mouth.

Last edited by kkb; February 8, 2010 at 01:35 PM.
kkb is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09233 seconds with 11 queries