The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 28, 2015, 07:04 PM   #26
rightside
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 419
For what it's worth, I've had the best luck using the mid-length gas port barrels. They seem to run better overall. This is just my experience and I'm sure others may feel different.
rightside is offline  
Old January 28, 2015, 10:07 PM   #27
globemaster3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 28, 2006
Posts: 1,482
Quote:
if you plan to scope the rifle, I wouldn't get anything with a sight tower installed. If you want a scope and A2 sight to get along, you have use risers for the scope or go to an offset scope mount. Otherwise, distortion and interference get incredibly annoying and lead to the front sight being removed and replaced with a lo-pro gas block, or the sight tower just being chopped off.
Fraken, how did this manifest? Many moons ago, on the first AR I bought, I mounted a 3-9X40 at WildAlaska's behest on a 16" M4gery and didn't notice any issue. That being said, I did not run it on there for long, as I bought another rifle configured for hunting with pic-rail gas block.
__________________
NRA Life Member

"We have enough gun control. What we need is idiot control."
globemaster3 is offline  
Old January 29, 2015, 01:04 AM   #28
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Quote:
Fraken, how did this manifest?
Fuzzy targets.
Strange distortion.
Reduced clarity.
Complete inability to get a repeatable sight picture.

It took me quite a while to figure out that it wasn't an issue with the scope, but the A2 FSB causing all of the symptoms ...because you don't see the FSB at all in most scopes with 4x magnification, or better. (That one was a 4-12x, it's currently wearing a different 4-12x.) From the shooter's point of view, behind the scope, the FSB interference is a "phantom" issue, but a real one, nonetheless.
On that middy, I didn't want to go any higher (or offset) with the scope. So, I pulled the FSB and went to town with a hacksaw and files. I cold-blued it until the color was close to the original phosphate finish, and reinstalled.

The scope picture instantly become MUCH more clear, brighter, and sight picture was repeatable. Honestly, I never would have suspected that I would even be able to see a target that was behind part of the rifle, had I not run into the issue for myself. It's crazy how much scopes bend light in their tubes, and how our brains can build a picture that our eyes aren't actually seeing.


It isn't a subject that comes up often, but I'm definitely not the first person to talk about it online. (The subject seems to come up most often on hog and predator forums where the shooters suddenly discover the problem while using weapon-mounted lights at night, and having the FSB reflect enough light to wash out the entire image.)
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old January 29, 2015, 08:27 AM   #29
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,237
I can totally see that happening... I used to pig and coyote hunt at night with a mini14, it has a small front sight.... it would reflect enough light to be annoying in the scope.
The red spotlight would clip to the scope .... If I moved the light around to the left of the scope it wasn't as bad as it was on top
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old January 29, 2015, 09:21 AM   #30
zukiphile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,454
FrankenMauser, this may not mean much coming from a not so handy fellow, but that front sight trimming is wonderfully neat. I've though about doing just that, but thought I would make a mess of it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankenMauser
If you plan on using iron sights, buying an upper or barrel with the A2-style front sight block is fine. But, if you plan to scope the rifle, I wouldn't get anything with a sight tower installed.
Do you run into anyone for whom that isn't a problem?

I have 2.5x scopes that I use with ARs with A2 front sights, and I haven't noticed a problem or even any shadow. Is it just that I stink generally and the distortion is smaller than my own inherent error?

Last edited by zukiphile; January 29, 2015 at 09:54 AM.
zukiphile is offline  
Old January 29, 2015, 09:40 AM   #31
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
Excluding the trigger, it isn't the lower that makes a good AR, its the upper.

If you can get all the parts in a lower, any lower, it doesn't matter, cheap or expensive.

Put you money in a trigger, then worry about the upper.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old January 29, 2015, 11:00 PM   #32
Geezerbiker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Willamina, OR
Posts: 1,908
I suppose this means I will be assembling the upper as well. To get what I want, I'll have to buy it a piece at a time and the cost rules out buying a complete upper...

Tony
Geezerbiker is offline  
Old January 29, 2015, 11:21 PM   #33
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Quote:
Do you run into anyone for whom that isn't a problem?

I have 2.5x scopes that I use with ARs with A2 front sights, and I haven't noticed a problem or even any shadow. Is it just that I stink generally and the distortion is smaller than my own inherent error?
There are plenty of people that don't care, don't notice, or don't shoot well enough for it to matter.
There are also people that have their scopes up so high that it isn't an issue, either.

But, the lower the magnification, the more likely the situation is to turn into "co-witness" rather than interference and distortion.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old January 29, 2015, 11:33 PM   #34
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,237
Get the stripped lower first

Then get the rest as you can

Barrel is gonna be the biggest expense if purchased separately, so get that when it is feasible, BCG will be the next highest expense. Everything else can be bit and pieced together

Accessories - handguards ect can be eBayed and swap-meet if funds are tight
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old January 30, 2015, 12:27 AM   #35
Dragline45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by zukiphile
FrankenMauser, this may not mean much coming from a not so handy fellow, but that front sight trimming is wonderfully neat. I've though about doing just that, but thought I would make a mess of it.
When you cut the front sight base down it acts just like a low profile gas block, throw a full length free float rail on there and you wont even be able to see it. Of course if you put a free float rail on you will need to remove or cut off the triangular plate behind the front sight base, as well as remove or cut off the delta ring.

Last edited by Dragline45; January 30, 2015 at 12:32 AM.
Dragline45 is offline  
Old January 30, 2015, 06:33 AM   #36
peggysue
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2014
Posts: 1,835
ARs tends to multiply once you build one...some of mine.

peggysue is offline  
Old January 30, 2015, 09:27 AM   #37
zukiphile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragline
When you cut the front sight base down it acts just like a low profile gas block, throw a full length free float rail on there and you wont even be able to see it. Of course if you put a free float rail on you will need to remove or cut off the triangular plate behind the front sight base, as well as remove or cut off the delta ring.
I like the way Franken did this in the picture precisely because it retains the pieces that permit mounting plastic handguards.

The practical limit of my accuracy is about a minute of angle. I can just about do that with standard handguards which I find more comfortable. Could I take a dremel to it and have something functional? Yes, but Franken's trim makes the piece appear as if it were manufactured that way.
zukiphile is offline  
Old January 31, 2015, 01:09 AM   #38
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Quote:
Yes, but Franken's trim makes the piece appear as if it were manufactured that way.
Thanks for the compliments.
But....

That was just a hacksaw, mill file, pillar file (non-tapered round file), and a bit of deburring with whatever aluminum oxide sand paper was on the bench. And then 3-4 rounds of cold blue and an oil bath to keep it from rusting.

Here's a photo with better lighting:
Up close, it's pretty obvious where the casting texture turns into a surface that was reworked. But, from even 2-3 feet, it blends right in on the rifle.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg FSB_chop_close_800_2.jpg (211.8 KB, 333 views)
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old January 31, 2015, 07:50 AM   #39
globemaster3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 28, 2006
Posts: 1,482
Franken, maybe so, but still commendable work! Your attention to detail shows.
__________________
NRA Life Member

"We have enough gun control. What we need is idiot control."
globemaster3 is offline  
Old January 31, 2015, 08:45 AM   #40
BumbleBug
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2013
Location: Near Heart of Texas
Posts: 870
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickyrick
The hardest thing is putting in the trigger guard pin LOL.
Good tip, even though LOL! I've seen several pictures of lowers cosmetically ruined by a busted "ear" on the trigger guard. Also Palmetto Armory is a good source for parts.

Have Fun!

...bug
BumbleBug is offline  
Old January 31, 2015, 08:51 AM   #41
noonesshowmonkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2014
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geezerbiker
I suppose this means I will be assembling the upper as well. To get what I want, I'll have to buy it a piece at a time and the cost rules out buying a complete upper...
There are so many people making so many good uppers that you can probably find someone making what you want.

What are your requirements?
noonesshowmonkey is offline  
Old January 31, 2015, 06:23 PM   #42
Dragline45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
Quote:
I suppose this means I will be assembling the upper as well. To get what I want, I'll have to buy it a piece at a time and the cost rules out buying a complete upper...
Check out BCM especially since they are offering free BCG's with every upper right now. They offer uppers in every length with standard or hammer forged barrels, lightweight, M4, or Government profile barrels, with either fixed front sight bases or low profile gas blocks. You can get just about any configuration you want in any length, and as far as I am concerned they are the best in the industry along with Daniel Defense for a duty use rifle.
Dragline45 is offline  
Old January 31, 2015, 09:19 PM   #43
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,237
What is the advantage to bcm uppers? What warrants their price? The descriptions they give on the website don't convince me to pay whole rifle prices for just a barreled upper?
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old February 1, 2015, 12:19 AM   #44
Dragline45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
Quote:
What is the advantage to bcm uppers? What warrants their price? The descriptions they give on the website don't convince me to pay whole rifle prices for just a barreled upper?
The quality of the materials used, the expertise that goes into building them, and the the top notch quality control.
Dragline45 is offline  
Old February 1, 2015, 12:33 AM   #45
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,237
400$ for an m4 cut barrel is pretty steep... It only goes up from there
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old February 1, 2015, 01:25 AM   #46
Dragline45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
Quote:
400$ for an m4 cut barrel is pretty steep... It only goes up from there
Just like anything else in life quality comes with a price. When you buy BCM it comes with the peace of mind that they were built with top quality materials, by some of the most experienced people in the industry, with excellent quality control and attention to detail. Will a $600 DPMS throw lead down rang just as well as my $1300 BCM build, maybe, but I don't hold the same confidence in a DPMS as I do my BCM.

The same goes for 1911's. You can buy a standard no frills 1911 for $500, and for most people it will do what they want. But you can't compare that same 1911 to a high end or custom 1911 for double the price or even more in some cases.
Dragline45 is offline  
Old February 1, 2015, 01:40 AM   #47
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,237
Valid points, I was just curious. I've never spent more than 1000 on any firearm... Except for a fal, but it came as a package deal with other non-FAL stuff with it..
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old February 2, 2015, 06:21 AM   #48
Brotherbadger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 10, 2010
Posts: 1,149
Basically, get whatever logo you want on your lower. Any forged logo will do fine.
__________________
Once Fired Brass, Top quality, Fast shipping, Best prices.

http://300AacBrass.com/ -10% Coupon use code " badger "
Brotherbadger is offline  
Old February 4, 2015, 07:54 PM   #49
Big Shrek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: NorthWest Florida
Posts: 1,358
Brownell's been running DPMS lowers for $49 since around October...
Palmetto State Armoury been running Blems for $49-59...

Reason for the lower AR-Lower prices?
MFR's figured out that its the best way to subvert the Anti's...
basically gives Anyone/Everyone an AR for cheap...
and they make more on the Other CNC parts anyway


Lots of folks talk about switching uppers, but with $49 Lowers,
its more effective to just OWN multiple AR chamberings
__________________
Marlin Specialist
Calico Specialist
A gun should be a tool in the hands of a deadly weapon, not a deadly weapon in the hands of a tool.
Big Shrek is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11604 seconds with 9 queries