December 15, 2009, 04:07 PM | #1 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Glass cannon
In a discussion of the state of glass, I told a physicist I thought he had convinced me of the verity of his statement and that in order to demonstrate that glass was in fact an inert gas we should launch a block from a Gilardoni air rifle in order to show how the gas would weave around his "steely abs". I figured someone on this site might actually understand his reply.
Quote:
This is what i get for talking to someone who starts their facebook name with Dr. and ends it with XI even though they aren't an MD or a superhero... Last edited by johnwilliamson062; December 15, 2009 at 04:17 PM. |
|
December 15, 2009, 04:29 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Posts: 78
|
Are you sure this guy is a physicist? He may have just spent too much time on Wikipedia. His buzzwords are "real" but those phenomena occur at the subatomic scale... which means you lasers and magnets not glass projectiles and air cannons.
|
December 15, 2009, 04:39 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,832
|
I'd go with Boltzmann statistics first. Me thinks we're talking a lot of gas that was generated behind his steely abs and then disappeared following Fick's law.
__________________
I used to love being able to hit hard at 1000 yards. As I get older I find hitting a mini ram at 200 yards with the 22 oddly more satisfying. |
December 15, 2009, 04:42 PM | #4 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,367
|
Sometimes there's a lot of comfort in being a dumbass. I think this is one of them.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
December 15, 2009, 05:27 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2009
Posts: 542
|
Glass isn't a gas. It's not a fluid, either. It's an amorphous solid. Even if it was a fluid, it still wouldn't be a gas. Gases have neither volume constancy nor shape constancy, and glass has both. Even if it was a supercooled liquid, it would still have volume constancy, which would make it not a gas.
|
December 15, 2009, 06:02 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,247
|
Quote:
But what does this have to do with firearms?
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
|
December 15, 2009, 06:07 PM | #7 | |
Junior member
Join Date: September 28, 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 6,465
|
Quote:
His "steely abs" would be safe after such an experiment, I'm pretty sure. Never seen glass that can compress or expand. Every time as a kid I experimented with such, the surface tension ruptured and I lost my allowance for several weeks. |
|
December 15, 2009, 06:14 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
|
Scorch,
Glass is an amorphous solid. No one calls amorphous steel a "supercooled liquid" even though it has the same lack of crystalline structure as glass. Then again, most glass isn't pure silicon dioxide, soda and lime are added in large quantities to prevent crystalization. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass Jimro
__________________
Machine guns are awesome until you have to carry one. |
December 15, 2009, 06:15 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Posts: 492
|
In theory it makes sense as Bose-Einstein condensate's don't follow normal laws. It takes extreme cold to get to a Bose-Einstein condensate though. They tend to flow through things that liquids in normal states can not flow through. It's not osmosis either, Bose-Einstein condensate's are very rare animals and don't last very long.
There is no way to make a projectile out of a Bose-Einstein condensate though, at least not yet. |
December 15, 2009, 07:21 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
|
johnwilliamson062,
The guy is full of it. Heisenbergs uncertainty principle only has to do with velocity and location of electrons. You can measure one, but not the other. Or as in most quantum physics, observing something changes it. A Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is just another state of matter, adding to the common solid, liquid, gas, and plasma states. From lowest energy to highest energy we would go BEC, solid, liquid, gas, plasma. The problem is that BEC are made by cooling gasses to the point that you tweak the probabilities of a quantum state to the lower energy state, allowing repulsive gasses to not be repulsive gasses. The state of matter does not change the mass of matter, so shooting anything is not massless will have an effect any other massive obect that it collides with. As far as shooting a BEC it isn't going to happen any time soon. So it sounds like Dr. XI (he's cranked the amplitude up to ELEVEN! spinaltap reference) needs to either go back to school, or go back on his meds. Jimro
__________________
Machine guns are awesome until you have to carry one. |
December 15, 2009, 07:28 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2009
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
|
|
December 15, 2009, 09:22 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Black Hills of S. Dakota
Posts: 195
|
Spock, shut up.
And I want my click back
__________________
LongRifles, Inc. "More than a business, This is a lifestyle." www.longriflesinc.com |
December 15, 2009, 09:25 PM | #13 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,367
|
Well, I'm personally going to apply the Irwin Certainty Principle...
Irwin is CERTAIN that this subject, while really interesting, isn't on topic anywhere at TFL... So, closed.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|