The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 25, 2010, 09:43 PM   #1
Bluesfan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 102
clean load.

I notice several posters wondering about clean powders.
This subject has never really interested me,however I reacently fired 50 rounds of AA#5 with a wsp and a berrys plated hollow piont.
Can't even tell the gun has been fired. Just thoughe I would pass on the experience.
Bluesfan is offline  
Old March 25, 2010, 10:37 PM   #2
joneb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Location: Central , OR
Posts: 1,888
For what cartridge ?
What was the bullet weight and powder charge ?
joneb is offline  
Old March 25, 2010, 10:57 PM   #3
Tex S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 12, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TEXAS
Posts: 909
I hope to get a clean burning load when I try out VV N105. For $30 a pound it better come with a little fairy that cleans my bore and brass!
Tex S is offline  
Old March 25, 2010, 11:20 PM   #4
Jobfix
Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2010
Location: "A Facist Subject" California
Posts: 64
Clean Burn

I've loaded for Rem. 22-250 & 243 Win. using VV N-550, N-560, N140, N150 and have experienced cleaner burn compared to BlC-2, H380, H414... The price per pound, though, is killing me lately.
Jobfix is offline  
Old March 27, 2010, 12:36 PM   #5
Bluesfan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 102
Sorry jibjab,
40 S&W, 6.5g AA#5,180g berry,s plated hollow point. the gun is a sigma VE.
Bluesfan is offline  
Old March 27, 2010, 11:11 PM   #6
joneb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Location: Central , OR
Posts: 1,888
At 33,500 psi I bet it is clean.
I use AA#5 as a replacement powder for Unique, AA#5 meters well in my powder throw. I tried it for .38spl with 158gr LRNFP at a charge of 5.5gr I had partially burned powder all over my S&W m-10 I upped the charge to 6.0gr and with a heavy crimp AA#5 shot clean and was very accurate. I'm glad when this sort of thing works out. I tried AA#5 initially for .45 acp where it works well for me in warmer loads, and also found it to be a favorite in 9x18 Makarov.
Bluesfan, I think you made a good choice. If it ain't broke don't fix it, or fix it till it is
joneb is offline  
Old March 28, 2010, 12:58 AM   #7
qcpunk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Farmsville, AZ
Posts: 305
Using AA#7 I have had similar results in .40s&w. I had one test batch with a few granules of unburnt powder left after each of the 10 shots. Never had any problems with any of my later #7 loads.... nice and clean, accurate, and metered well in my thrower.
__________________
"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it." --Abraham Lincoln
qcpunk is offline  
Old March 28, 2010, 12:07 PM   #8
Bluesfan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 102
Thanks for the feedback jibjab. Looks like this load is a keeper. The accuracy was quite good also. You wouldn't know it was shot with a sigma.
By the way how did you arrive at the pressure figure?
Bluesfan is offline  
Old March 28, 2010, 12:18 PM   #9
joneb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Location: Central , OR
Posts: 1,888
http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/A...%20version.pdf
joneb is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04030 seconds with 8 queries