The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 19, 2009, 06:16 PM   #1
jon1163
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 9
Substituting one 230gr for another?

I usually load .45 230 gr TMJ RN remington bullets with 5.9 grains of unique.

I have some Hodgdon universal clays I'm trying to load up .45. My question is that the load I'm looking at (http://data.hodgdon.com/cartridge_load.asp) with this powder is for this bullet: 230 GR. HDY FMJ FP. So because they are both FMJ and both 230 gr can i just use this powder load for this bullet?

Starting/max grain for .45 with 230 gr hdy fmj fp is 5.1gr/5.6gr of h. universal.
I have a Speer reloading manual that says 230 gr TMJ RN with H. Universral is 5.5 gr to 6.3 gr start to max.

To put it in a nutshell does FMJ/TMJ of the same weight equal interchangeable regardless of the shape of the nose of the bullet? Or should I treat each bullet as a unique object in and of itself?

Thanks-
Jon-Seattle
jon1163 is offline  
Old March 19, 2009, 06:46 PM   #2
ligonierbill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,456
It is always a good idea to back off to a starting load and work up when you change bullets. Sure, they may end up the same, but it is not much of an inconvenience for peace of mind. If you have to ask...you already know the answer.
ligonierbill is offline  
Old March 19, 2009, 06:49 PM   #3
tiberius10721
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 22, 2008
Posts: 228
im looking at my lee reloading manual and for a 230 grain jacketed bullet using clays it gives min and max powder charges of 4.5 to 4.7 grains so a load using 5.9 seems kinda high.Me personally i would start at 4.5 grains.my lee manual also gives minimum oal of1.190.My manual is a 1996 edition so maybe the load data is kinda old but i would play it on the safe side.theres a big difference between 4.7 grains and 5.9 grains.
tiberius10721 is offline  
Old March 19, 2009, 06:51 PM   #4
tiberius10721
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 22, 2008
Posts: 228
I think legioneer bill is giving good advise.play it safe!
tiberius10721 is offline  
Old March 19, 2009, 10:03 PM   #5
Nnobby45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
Quote:
To put it in a nutshell does FMJ/TMJ of the same weight equal interchangeable regardless of the shape of the nose of the bullet? Or should I treat each bullet as a unique object in and of itself?
Different shapes put different amounts of bullet in contact with the bore. Copper jackets can vary in hardness. Pressure can be affected.

If you load down well below max, my chrongraph results down thru the years, indicate you don't have to worry about it. Whether it's plated or jacketed.

On the other hand, substituting, for example, Win. JHP for a hardball round will develop more pressure. I can speculate that it's because quite a bit more of the bullet is in contact with the bore because of the profile of the bullet, but be careful. A chrono will give you much information that you should be recording and learning from.

When, typically, a max charge for 230 HB is from 5.8 to 6.0 gr. of W231, I don't worry about the minor differences in different brands of with re: to profile, since I load 5.5 gr. and because HB can't be that much different.

Last edited by Nnobby45; March 19, 2009 at 10:08 PM.
Nnobby45 is offline  
Old March 20, 2009, 12:26 AM   #6
jon1163
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 9
Quote:
so a load using 5.9 seems kinda high.
5.9 of Unique not H. Universal. 5.9 of Unique is what my Speer manual says is the starting load. I used 4.5 grains of my H. Universal thinking it was Clays (it says clays in really big letters on the front) with 185 gr JHP and it was so low it wouldn't cycle the slide.
jon1163 is offline  
Old March 20, 2009, 02:20 AM   #7
Dingoboyx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 7, 2009
Location: South East Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,513
+1 LigonierBill

If you dont like (nasty) suprises always start lower if you change anything

Start safe, stay safe. You can always pull the slugs and put a little more powder in, you cant grow back a new hand (or the guy beside you)

Muzza
__________________
Muzza
If you cant blind them with brilliance, Baffle them with BS
Be alert...... there is a shortage of LERTs
Dingoboyx is offline  
Old March 20, 2009, 02:32 AM   #8
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
Yup. Hodgdon Clays, International Clays, and Universal Clays are three different powders. I think there is enough confusion about that naming system they should drop "Clays" from all but the first one.

My rule of thumb is to reduce a Unique charge weight by 5% to get about the same peak pressure as the Unique charge got. But if you are working a load up, you'll want to start even lower and work up.

No, the bullets are not the same. The cause is that the nose shapes force you to use different seating depths with them to get a COL that feeds properly from a magazine and shoots reasonably well. The difference in the depth to which the base is seated changes the space the powder is burning in when it starts. Smaller space = higher pressure for a given bullet weight and powder charge. The thickenss of the jacket and other factors mentioned will affect it too.

Rule of thumb: Any time you change ANY component or the lot number it comes from, back your loads off 10% and work them back up.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old March 20, 2009, 07:05 AM   #9
jon1163
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 9
So I have Universal Clays...the sixth one down on this page: http://www.hodgdon.com/shotpist.html

In my Speer book I am thinking this correlates to the powder "H. Universal". Is that correct?

Thanks everyone for all your help.
jon1163 is offline  
Old March 21, 2009, 12:45 PM   #10
FM12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 5, 2007
Location: Monroeville, Alabama
Posts: 1,683
I recommend the data by the bullet manufacturer, they're the ones that developed the load. NEVER assume anything in handloading when it comes to powder charges.
FM12 is offline  
Old March 21, 2009, 05:06 PM   #11
Doby45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2009
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 213
Yes, H. Universal would be Universal Clays. I got 4 pounds I have not started playing with cause I need to finish off my HS-6. Got about half a pound to go. :-)
Doby45 is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 09:53 AM   #12
Johnny Guest
Moderator in Memoriam
 
Join Date: August 28, 1999
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,123
TMJ does NOT equal FMJ

There is frequently some differences in the max posted loads listed between the various manuals. Usually, this is pretty insignificant.

Please note, though: The TMJ stands for Total Metal Jacket(ed) and this is NOT the same as FMJ, or Full Metal Jacket. TMJ, meaning no exposed lead, is a plated bullet, of the type popularized by Ranier and Berry's, and which is the start of the process by which Speer makes their Gold Dot hollow point bullets.

The caliber .45 230 grain FMJ RN bullets from the various manufacturers are practically the same products - - A lead core encased in a thick gilding metal jacket. This jacket is far thicker and much harder than the plating on TMJ bullets. This means that an FMJ bullet will typically develop higher pressures with the same powder charge than the plated bullet.

You won't go wrong in using load data for cast lead bullets and plated bullets interchangeably. If loading toward the high end, though, you CAN get excessive pressures, if you put a hard-jacketed FMJ bullet over a load that is warm for a cast bullet.

Please note, too, that different configurations of JACKETED hollow point bullets have different bearing surfaces. A maximum load worked up for a JHP with a short bearing surfact may be too hot is a different bullet, with a long bearing surface is substituted.


jon1163 - - To address your specific question, one's best bet is always to go with the loading recommendations published by the bullet manufacturer. Also, the more complete manuals, such as the Lyman 48th Reloading Handbook, specify WHICH EXACT bullet they tested with which loads.

I shoot a lot of hand loaded .45 ACP in various guns: Colt's Government Model, National Match (pre-Gold Cup,) and alloy-framed Commander and Officers ACP. I use the same ammo in my Argentine Sistema 1927, an S&W 1917 revolver, and a Thompson SMG. For different purposes, I use cast, FMJ, plated, and occasionally swaged bullets. The cast and plated bullets are the only ones with which I use identical powder charges. I tend to use loads that are well under maximum for a given bullet. I see no use in increasing wear and tear on my firearms by use of anything approaching the maximum safe loads. My non-max loads are accurate and function reliably. For "social purposes," I stick with factory Gold Dot JHP or FMJRN. These are adequately powerful, and I see no need to "soup them up" by handloading.

Good luck to you.
Johnny
Johnny Guest is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05429 seconds with 8 queries