The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 17, 2009, 10:55 AM   #1
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
Stainless USFA 1860 or not?

I spied a used USFA 1860 with box at my local gunshop yesterday. It was down behind the counter because the owner still hadn't set the price on it yet.
I briefly checked it out and asked if it was stainless steel or not and the clerk showed that it attracted a magnet, but that's not a positive indication.
It has sort of a plain grey steel look to it that isn't like the typical brightly polished current stainless steel models that I'm used to seeing. The steel didn't look really white.
And at first glance, I noticed that one of the cylinder bolt slots had some surface oxidation.
IIRC the USFA's were assembled using Uberti parts.
For comparison, does anyone know whether Uberti's stainless guns are magnetic or not? How about the licensed stainless Colt 1860's that were made with Uberti parts, were they?
Someone recently reported that their new stainless steel ASM was non-magnetic.
And I've read threads clearly indicating that there are 2 different kinds of stainless, magnetic and non-magnetic.
Lastly does anyone have any information about this USFA model and its possible value?
When I first cocked the gun I thought that it felt a little bit sluggish like maybe the wedge was too tight or it had a weak spring. But it seemed to improve with each cocking. Overall it appeared to be a tight, precision made revolver. I know that members have expressed interest in stainless 1860's, but how to determine whether it's stainless or not?
Maybe the price will be an indication.
It has a 4 digit serial number. Maybe an inquiry to USFA would reveal whether they assembled any stainless guns or not.
It was the first USFA that I've seen. Too bad I didn't have a camera with me.

Final note: A response on THR indicated that the licensed stainless Colt 1860's are magnetic.

Last edited by arcticap; June 17, 2009 at 02:24 PM.
arcticap is offline  
Old June 17, 2009, 11:18 AM   #2
Smokin_Gun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 2005
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 1,195
Arcticap, all I can offer is that the Euroarms Stainless Steel Rem I had the Barrel and Frame were magnetic...the cylinder & webbed loading lever was non-magnetic.
I have a Ruger Police Service Six in Stainless Steel and it is all magnetic.
Wish I had more info for you.
__________________
"I Smoke Black Powder" "Favor an 1858 Remington"
SGT. Smokin' Gun, Mosby's Rangers 43rd Virginia Cavalry C.S.A.
SASS# 19634, ...
Admin:http://blackpowdersmoke.com/oldcoots/index.php
Smokin_Gun is offline  
Old June 17, 2009, 02:48 PM   #3
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
Quote:
For comparison, does anyone know whether Uberti's stainless guns are magnetic or not? How about the licensed stainless Colt 1860's that were made with Uberti parts, were they?
Someone recently reported that their new stainless steel ASM was non-magnetic.
And I've read threads clearly indicating that there are 2 different kinds of stainless, magnetic and non-magnetic.
2nd Gen SS 1851 Navy, circa 1982 - Barrel & frame - magnetic; Cylinder, backstrap, triggerguard & loading lever, non-magnetic.
2nd Gen SS 1860 Army, circa 1982 - Barrel & frame - Magnetic; Cylinder, backstrap, triggerguard, loading lever - non-magnetic.
Uberti SS 1851 Navy, 1982 date code - Barrel - magnetic; Frame, cylinder, backstrap, triggerguard, loading lever - non-magnetic.

Cant speak to Remmie clones - don't own any in SS (or CCH either for that matter)
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old June 17, 2009, 09:27 PM   #4
CraigC
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2001
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 4,300
All stainless steel attracts a magnet. Steel is an alloy of iron and carbon, it's the iron that attracts a magnet. So for it to be steel, it has to have a varying percentage of iron in it. The only thing required for it to be "stainless" is the addition of at least 11% (if I remember that right) chromium. Therefore, the magnet test is not really valid.

Even so, the USPFA percussion guns would've been completely fit and finished from raw forgings from Uberti. Not just assembled of Uberti parts. They have never used stainless steel so if it is a "white" finish, it's either in the white or some sort of plating. If it's a soft brushed finish, it's probably in the white.
CraigC is offline  
Old June 17, 2009, 09:44 PM   #5
AdmiralB
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Posts: 88
Quote:
All stainless steel attracts a magnet. Steel is an alloy of iron and carbon, it's the iron that attracts a magnet. So for it to be steel, it has to have a varying percentage of iron in it. The only thing required for it to be "stainless" is the addition of at least 11% (if I remember that right) chromium. Therefore, the magnet test is not really valid.
Hogwash. All SS does NOT attract a magnet (like, 300 series).

Nonmagnetic stainless steels have different grain structures than 'plain' steels, and that's what makes them nonmagnetic.

Google 'austenite' for an education.
AdmiralB is offline  
Old June 17, 2009, 10:44 PM   #6
CraigC
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2001
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 4,300
I stand corrected. Doesn't change the fact that the magnet test does not determine whether or not it is stainless steel or the fact that USFA never used stainless. But thanks for the attitude.
CraigC is offline  
Old June 17, 2009, 10:58 PM   #7
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
Even so, the USPFA percussion guns would've been completely fit and finished from raw forgings from Uberti. Not just assembled of Uberti parts. They have never used stainless steel so if it is a "white" finish, it's either in the white or some sort of plating. If it's a soft brushed finish, it's probably in the white.
I can appreciate that information as far as I think that you're referring to USFA and not Uberti.
I now believe that the USFA probably is just plain, brushed steel since it has such a simple plain steel color.
However I can't imagine what kind of plating that USFA or any other major manufacturer would use to duplicate the look of plain steel.
But how do you know that USFA didn't make any 1860's in stainless? Is that found or deduced from a BP price guide or reference book etc...?
Another reason for asking is that some [smaller] companies might produce a limited run or # of prototypes based on a small batch of sample parts which aren't necessarily advertised due to their limited availability.

Last edited by arcticap; June 17, 2009 at 11:08 PM.
arcticap is offline  
Old June 17, 2009, 11:10 PM   #8
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
Quote:
But how do you know that USFA didn't make any 1860's in stainless? Is that found or deduced from a BP price guide or reference book?
6th edition Blue Book of Modern Black Powder Arms listing for USFA states "USFA manufactured reproduction Colt percussion revolvers from 1995 to 2000." "All guns have color case hardened (bone) frames, hammers & loading levers, dome blue barrels and cylinders, silver plated backstraps & triggerguards, exceptions will be noted' None of the individual model descriptions list a SS exception.
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old June 17, 2009, 11:19 PM   #9
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
Thanks for trying so hard.
It's always fun to speculate.
I could be wrong but I don't recall seeing any case coloring on this piece at all, especially not on the frame.
I suppose that anyone could have brushed it and maybe USFA would be able to confirm that.
However, USFA does have quite a custom shop today and maybe back then they also offered options for custom finishing?
What are some of the values of USFA C&B's?

Last edited by arcticap; June 17, 2009 at 11:26 PM.
arcticap is offline  
Old June 18, 2009, 12:12 AM   #10
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
Here's the page out of the book.
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old June 18, 2009, 01:36 AM   #11
Smokin_Gun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 2005
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 1,195
Quote:
Doesn't change the fact that the magnet test does not determine whether or not it is stainless steel
But it does if the magnet don't stick :O)
__________________
"I Smoke Black Powder" "Favor an 1858 Remington"
SGT. Smokin' Gun, Mosby's Rangers 43rd Virginia Cavalry C.S.A.
SASS# 19634, ...
Admin:http://blackpowdersmoke.com/oldcoots/index.php
Smokin_Gun is offline  
Old June 18, 2009, 08:33 AM   #12
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
Fingers -

The Blue Book of Modern Black Powder Arms, while a very useful and more often than not correct reference, is not definitive. It does contain several errors (mostly omissions, but sometimes inclusions) regarding model features and sometimes even entire models.

I don't know whether it is correct with respect to USFA entries, but I advise caution in using it as authoritative.
mykeal is offline  
Old June 18, 2009, 08:49 AM   #13
mec
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 6, 2001
Posts: 1,536
My friends stainless colt 2nd gen is not brightly polished. More of a subdued sheen
mec is offline  
Old June 18, 2009, 09:23 AM   #14
CraigC
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2001
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 4,300
Quote:
But it does if the magnet don't stick
Apparently it can go either way with either steel.


Quote:
But how do you know that USFA didn't make any 1860's in stainless?
Because USFA doesn't do stainless. It is not traditional. A white finish with a soft brushed luster is.

Brushed hard chrome can be a close match to unfinished steel. White carbon steel and stainless are virtually indistinguishable and chrome is often used to match stainless. Silver plate is also very similar.

USFA has always produced non-catalogued guns on special order. I have an all-blue US"P"FA SAA .45Colt that was not a catalog item.
CraigC is offline  
Old June 18, 2009, 11:14 AM   #15
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
I made a bet with a guy at a Gun Show, that any S.S. rated gun there, would attract a magnet. There are many grades of S.S. and any used on the parts that see pressure or need strength, are magnetic. If not, You are looking for trouble. Don't know for how long he looked but never got back to me. In fact, I think he just left, after a time. I own a Lyman S.S. DeerStalker. All thet trim is non-magnetic S.S., even the lock plate and hammer but the barrel is magnetic. Might add, that this is a "Hawken-Style" side lock.


Be Safe !!!
Pahoo is offline  
Old June 18, 2009, 11:31 AM   #16
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
Today one of the salesman said that they were trying to get info. on the piece from USFA in order to place a value on it, that someone was interested in buying it and that the gun has been held up for a couple of weeks now because of it.
This salesman said that the pistol was in the white and was part of a project that USFA never followed through on to completion.
He also said to call back later if I wanted to speak to one of the owners about it.

If the gunshop sets the price too high then the buyer might back out.
The gun shop doesn't seem to know enough about this particular USFA gun yet either.
arcticap is offline  
Old June 18, 2009, 12:51 PM   #17
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
Mykeal,

I know that the BB is rife with errors & omissions and should only be used as a guide. I included it as one source of information to use as a starting point. Arcticap asked for a source, I provided one.
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old June 18, 2009, 03:25 PM   #18
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
Because USFA doesn't do stainless. It is not traditional. A white finish with a soft brushed luster is.
That makes good sense and I believe it.

I do appreciate posting the reference guide values too because most of us don't have it and the USFA's are hardly ever discussed.

The Blue Book doesn't mention USFA C&B's, but just by looking for info. in it I noticed that they list a USFA 1851 Richards Navy Conversion in .38 special and it wasn't inexpensive having an MSRP of $1300.

Last edited by arcticap; June 19, 2009 at 02:04 AM.
arcticap is offline  
Old June 18, 2009, 04:06 PM   #19
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fingers McGee
I know that the BB is rife with errors & omissions and should only be used as a guide. I included it as one source of information to use as a starting point. Arcticap asked for a source, I provided one.
I understand. Apologies for my tone; I didn't mean to come across so stridently.
mykeal is offline  
Old August 5, 2009, 09:01 PM   #20
Chain-Fire
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Posts: 5
Stainless USFA 1860 or not?

Hello articap,

I stumbled across this rather old thread and was curious as to what ever became of the USFA 1860 Army Richards conversion mentioned in your inquiry. Were you successful in purchasing it, or did it go to someone else?

I noticed there was a lot of conversation regarding whether this piece was stainless steel or in-the-white or some other finish. I offer the possibility that it could be an electroless nickel finish. It may be of interest to know that a handful of Colt second generation 1860 Armies were produced with an electroless nickel finish. It has a dull brushed look similar to gray in-the-white as well as the brushed low lustre variation of stainless steel finishes.

It may also be of interest to know that stainless steel Colt second generation1860 Armies were produced in two variations. Early serial numbered guns tend have a brushed low lustre finish while late serial number guns tend to have a polished bright finish.

Regarding the detection of stainless steel, a distinguishing feature of all stainless steel Colt second generation percussion revolvers (1860 Army, 1861 Navy and 1851 Navy) is the fact that the cylinder, loading lever, and grip straps do not attract a magnet. This would also probably be true for any stainless steel USFA percussion revolver since both Colt and USFA percussion revolvers have a similar heritage - Uberti. However, I am not aware of any stainless steel revolvers produced by USFA. Most likely the USFA 1860 Army you are considering is regular steel - either in-the-white or as mentioned earlier, electroless nickel.

One additional clue might be the trigger guard. If the trigger guard is brass, I would say with almost 100% certainty that the remainder of the gun would be standard steel - not stainless steel.

I hope this helps.
Chain-Fire is offline  
Old August 6, 2009, 08:17 AM   #21
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
Quote:
Colt second generation 1860 Armies were produced with an electroless nickel finish. It has a dull brushed look similar to gray in-the-white as well as the brushed low lustre variation of stainless steel finishes.
Welcome to the forum Chain-fire. I have to disagree with you on the electroless nickel finish. I have a NIB, electroless nickel 1860 Colt, it is as shiny as polished silver. I've also used a Caswell electroless nickel kit to plate small items and the finish is very shiny if your prep work is right.
madcratebuilder is offline  
Old August 6, 2009, 10:00 AM   #22
CraigC
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2001
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 4,300
It should be easy to tell if it's nickel. There's no mistaking that slight bronze hue.
CraigC is offline  
Old August 6, 2009, 10:16 PM   #23
Chain-Fire
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Posts: 5
Hello madcratebuilder,

Quote:
Welcome to the forum Chain-fire. I have to disagree with you on the electroless nickel finish. I have a NIB, electroless nickel 1860 Colt, it is as shiny as polished silver. I've also used a Caswell electroless nickel kit to plate small items and the finish is very shiny if your prep work is right.
Congratulations on owning an electroless nickel Colt 1860 Army. It is a rare bird indeed. Regarding your response to my post, actually we could both be correct. Colt produced a handful of second generation 1860 Army revolvers in three nickel variations. Over the years, I have observed several of these revolvers in each variation. They were all produced by the Colt Custom Gun Shop and all were within a very narrow serial number range from 202000 to 202200.

First is the electroless nickel variation I mentioned earlier. This particular variation was fully plated using the electroless nickel process. The model number for this variation is F1200LNK. All revolvers observed had a matt finish as previously described. However, with Colt, almost anything is possible. Perhaps your electroless nickel 1860 Army is different. If so, I would respectfully be interested in knowing more about it.

A second electroless nickel 1860 Army variation was also produced by Colt. This variation has a brighter nickel finish and the brass trigger guard is not plated. In fact, there is one school of thought which concludes that after polishing and prep work, this variation completely missed the nickel plating process and was actually shipped in-the-white. These revolvers were typically shipped with a presentation case, a complete set of Colt accessories as well as a shoulder stock and a two tone second edition belt buckle. However, over the years, some of these sets were busted up. So occasionally a single revolver without all the extras will turn up.

Third and finally, Colt produced a small quantity of second generation 1860 Army revolvers with a highly polished bright nickel finish. All metal surfaces were nickel plated. The model number for this variation is F1200MN. These revolvers were produced by the use of traditional nickel plating processes.

Since your revolver is NIB, the end label should contain a wealth of interesting information. As I mentioned earlier, I would be interested in knowing more about your specific revolver - Model Number, Custom Shop (C.S.) Number, Factory Order (F/O) Number, Serial Number, etc. Any assistance you can provide for my research would be greatly appreciated.

Best regards.
Chain-Fire is offline  
Old August 8, 2009, 02:16 AM   #24
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
I stumbled across this rather old thread and was curious as to what ever became of the USFA 1860 Army Richards conversion mentioned in your inquiry. Were you successful in purchasing it, or did it go to someone else?
The Richards Conversion was only antecdotal since I only came across its existance in Blue Book. So there wasn't one for sale.
The original post was about an 1860 C&B and after my last post about it, I didn't try to follow it up at the gun shop any more.
arcticap is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09247 seconds with 8 queries