|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 10, 2016, 05:54 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 1999
Location: California
Posts: 2,716
|
Does anyone make a .22 conversion for Browning Hi Power?
I have the BHP but wonder if any conversion could cock what seems to be a VERY stiff mainspring.
|
November 10, 2016, 06:24 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 1999
Location: Winston-Salem, NC USA
Posts: 6,348
|
I've no personal experience with the Ciener kit, but Ciener makes one for the BHP. http://www.22lrconversions.com/hpk-pg.htm I've heard praise and complaints about Ciener products.
Some conversion kits use very light slides and don't use the stock recoil spring. Others don't even use a slide that moves -- just part of the upper assembly (with a cover on the bolt) actually moves. That's how the CZ Kadet Kit works. Keep looking, and you'll probably find others. Last edited by Walt Sherrill; November 11, 2016 at 09:03 PM. |
November 10, 2016, 10:33 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 2, 2001
Location: Out West in Rim Country
Posts: 1,093
|
I had a Peters Stahl kit on a Browning Hi Power years ago. It had no trouble cocking the hammer....
__________________
COTEP 640, NRA Life |
November 11, 2016, 07:08 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 813
|
I recently purchased a Ciener kit for my 1911 Officers frame. Great product, great customer service. The old man, who was the cause of so many complaints, seems to be out of the picture now and I am very happy with the fit and function of the kit. They do make a .22 conversion for the BHP.
__________________
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. |
November 12, 2016, 10:29 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 591
|
I have a Ciener conversion for a 1911. It works fine. I like the 15 round aluminum magazines.
|
November 12, 2016, 10:15 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2002
Posts: 2,108
|
Have both the Ceiner and Stahls units, both are great. Stahls units are very hard to find and expensive. Ciener is a very reliable nice conversion.
|
November 12, 2016, 10:25 PM | #7 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Quote:
Hardly a bad thing said about the Ciener units beyond Ciener himself being a pain to work with. One day I will get one. |
|
January 13, 2017, 03:29 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
|
I bought mine at a gun show so I have no direct contact with them. Like all 22s you must find what ammo it likes. Mine works fine with Remington, with W-W and CCI failures to extract. Mine needs a little breaking in, a spot of lube on the slide rails makes for reliable functioning.
|
January 14, 2017, 10:30 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,624
|
I've had Ciener's on three 1911's and all worked well..with CCI Mini-Mags and other high speed .22's. I found that you've got to keep the chambers and bolt face clean with them and grease does not work well on the frame rails. I use military CLP on mine and have good success. Accuracy is on a par with my Smith M41...in other words, superb...<2" at 25 yds from rest. HTH's Rod
__________________
Cherish our flag, honor it, defend it in word and deed, or get the hell out. Our Bill of Rights has been paid for by heros in uniform and shall not be diluted by misguided governmental social experiments. We owe this to our children, anything less is cowardice. USAF FAC, 5th Spl Forces, Vietnam Vet '69-'73. |
|
|