October 24, 2013, 08:19 AM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 635
|
Witaschek case
I have not seen this case discussed here. I am absolutely shocked that this sort of thing can happen in America. 30, count 'em 30, armed officers enter the home of Mark Witaschek to find... spent ammunition. They terrorize the teens (one of which is in the shower) and the adults by aiming weapons at their heads, handcuffing everyone.
Quote:
Emily Miller's story is here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...egis/?page=all
__________________
SAF, ACLDN, IDPA, handgunlaw.us My AmazonSmile benefits SAF I'd rather be carried by 6 than caged by 12. 2020: It's pronounced twenty twenty. Last edited by motorhead0922; October 24, 2013 at 08:25 AM. |
|
October 24, 2013, 12:45 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 317
|
Quote:
Here was his fatal mistake. Allowing law enforcement into your home without a warrant is a non-recoverable error. |
|
October 26, 2013, 02:39 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2011
Posts: 356
|
This is one of those "wrath of a woman scorned" (ex-wife) cases. I am still trying to figure out how you "register" ammunition, or how you are supposed to "unregister" that ammo when you use it up at the range. This is a law that demands change, and Emily might just be the one to achieve it. Outrageous is an understatement.
I read the article--it seems it is illegal in DC to possess any ammunition for a firearm that is not registered in DC. Totally bizarre. Why should it matter, and how does such a law reduce crime? Further, the article states that the defendant has his firearms stored at his sister's house in Virginia--and they were apparently seized by a criminal warrant? On what grounds? Prosecutorial misconduct seems an appropriate inference. Last edited by 62coltnavy; October 26, 2013 at 02:46 AM. |
|
|