The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 25, 2011, 08:39 PM   #51
Jason_G
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,902
Even with $100 off, it's still the price of a whole 'nother rifle. And I'm not sure if you could shave enough $$ off of it to make it look any better to me. As much as I like some of the ideas that went into it, especially the mechanical bedding, and free floated barrel, I think it just ain't for me. Of course, I like wood and iron sights, so what do I know? Hope you enjoy it at any rate.

Jason
__________________
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." -Amendment II, Constitution of the United States of America
Jason_G is offline  
Old October 2, 2011, 08:57 AM   #52
Famas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Location: French, currently living in US
Posts: 162
It's a very interesting proposal...how much does something like this cost, or is it only in experimental stages still? It does resemble my old service rifle in many ways, as you may have guessed from my user name. I distinctly remember in 1995 being in Metkovic with German soldiers during a joint live fire exercise, during which we played with Famas and Styers all day long. An interesting conversation came up about what if these rifles were enlarged and used 7.62 NATO instead of 5.56?

I'm curious to know what ejection was like on your Rogue M-14. Our Famas never was bad, but ejection was always irregular and almost never consistent. Expended cases went everywhere, occasionally they hit us too.
Famas is offline  
Old October 11, 2011, 07:28 PM   #53
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,336
BULLPUP SHOOT 2011







SR420 is offline  
Old October 11, 2011, 07:32 PM   #54
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,336
Rogue Ejection Pattern

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UioP2EtnYds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_bZv...watch_response
SR420 is offline  
Old November 1, 2011, 09:56 AM   #55
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,336
SR420 is offline  
Old November 16, 2011, 08:48 AM   #56
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,336
Continued @ M14 Bullpup ~ The evolution continues
SR420 is offline  
Old November 19, 2011, 06:10 AM   #57
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,336
Now on Facebook
SR420 is offline  
Old February 22, 2012, 07:23 PM   #58
BrokenSailor
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 2, 2011
Posts: 3
Another Rogue Shooter

I have been shooting a Rogue for a little bit now and it is very nice. I didn't even notice the brass shooting out by my face. Zero concern. It was very consistent.

It is free floated, using different internals for std, medium, and HW barrels. There is no difference in accuracy; It still shoots better than I. It is very balanced, and I like it much more than the Troy chassis, which, is a bit fore end heavy.

I don't know how you can look at a picture of the Rogue and say that it has a crappy trigger compared to the Short Rifle Bullpup. The trigger pull is nice and smooth. I checked the pull before and after the build and the new trigger added a pound. The SRS bullpup isn't even around for anyone to shoot to compare triggers, let alone buy. The thing is a phantom chassis. All I have ever seen were pictures. A lot of these manufactures of new chassis take deposits and than you wait and wait, then hope you can get your money back when they don't deliver. Word is that he owes money to his suppliers. It has been about a year wait for me so far. I had my Rogue in a couple days.

The left side charging handle is a very nice feature although I have not gotten used to it yet. Mag changes are nice and easy. Still gotta rock em, and a foregrip helps manhandle the weapon as it is pretty short. With 15 inches of top rail, you can mount anything you want.

If you don't want to pay the price, I can understand. The price of this stock is the same as all of the others out there. Considering this one comes with the stock and grip it is a pretty nice price. My Troy cost me more to build. The Rogue cost me less then the J Allen. The best part is that you don't have to buy an expensive or heavy scope mount for your M1a/M14. I paid $300 for my steel SEI mount.
BrokenSailor is offline  
Old February 23, 2012, 07:19 AM   #59
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,336
BrokenSailor, welcome back to The Firing Line!

The left side charging handle does take some getting used to for some.
I like it most when I'm firing sub sonic through my sound suppressor
and consider it a must have item for the bullpup conversion.

What barrel are you running in your Rogue and what optics?





.

Last edited by SR420; February 23, 2012 at 07:50 AM.
SR420 is offline  
Old February 24, 2012, 12:26 PM   #60
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,336
Quote:
BrokenSailor

I have been shooting a Rogue for a little bit now and it is very nice. I didn't even notice the brass shooting out by my face. Zero concern. It was very consistent.


The left side charging handle is a very nice feature although I have not gotten used to it yet. Mag changes are nice and easy.
Still gotta rock em, and a foregrip helps manhandle the weapon as it is pretty short. With 15 inches of top rail, you can mount anything you want.

The left side charging handle does take some getting used to for some.
I like it most when I'm firing sub sonic through my sound suppressor
and consider it a must have item for the bullpup conversion.

What barrel are you running in your Rogue and what optics?
SR420 is offline  
Old March 8, 2012, 07:55 AM   #61
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,336
I've been asked about weight more than once...
The basic kit weighs just over 6 pounds... that's before you install a barreled action and minimal accessories.
A complete Scout barreled action weighs just under 6 pounds... a naked Rogue will weigh 12 pounds and it only gets heavier.


If you are considering buying a Rogue there are a few things you should know about it.

1. It's heavy... it's heavier than any of my SAGE EBRs and TROY MCS that I've owned.

2. The Rogue trigger uses a steel rod to reach back to the rifles trigger, you feel the added linkage and the rod rattles.

3. Mag changes require a 'reach around' technique that is cumbersome and slow.

4. Optics require additional height... I used a riser and a set of tall rings to get proper scope alignment.

5. Unlike the SAGE EBR, the Rogue chassis is not designed to enhance your rifles accuracy.

6. The Rogue conversion kit is expensive, expect to spend around $1k to get a basic kit.


Bottom line:

The Rogue is probably the best conversion kit currently available, but it could be better... it could be a lot lighter.

You can see what I did @ H2O's Rogue Modifications & Upgrades and on my facebook page @ H2O's Rogue M14








The initial ‘grin factor’ when you first start using the JTac Rogue is HUGE and it can last a month or more, but it does
fade away and then you are forced to accept the reality that you are stuck with a fat bottomed girl that rides a Moped.









.

Last edited by SR420; March 8, 2012 at 09:42 AM.
SR420 is offline  
Reply

Tags
h2o man , m14 bullpup , m14hdw.us , rogue


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04653 seconds with 10 queries