|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 16, 2012, 08:02 AM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
Quote:
|
|
February 16, 2012, 09:05 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
I am still looking for a single stack version of the Sig SP2022.
I.e. more concealable with the hammer fired setup and the simpler lever system of that gun (at a decent price like the Sig.) Most of the more informed reports I read just did not seem to think the Nano cut it. Interested but not sold, on my list to handle one as I may not get what I want. Will play the field as it were and even if it does not fit the criteria, it will help the sorting process. Good point may be that like the Sig, its dropped the price point a lot, getting into reasonable territory. I think most guns are overpriced badly. Nano is not (Sig 290 running what $700? sheese) |
February 16, 2012, 09:17 AM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Location: Western PA.
Posts: 1,630
|
Quote:
It is very uncomfortable being dead! The Nano can actually SHOOT, when pulled from its uncomfortable pocket. A gun that can't shoot well at reasonable distances do not interest me. Bad guys do not restrict distance, nor do I!
__________________
......................................................... "If Ands and Buts were Candy and Nuts, everyday would be like Christmas" |
|
February 16, 2012, 09:40 AM | #29 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 13, 2008
Location: Hermit's Peak
Posts: 623
|
Quote:
We get it- you love your nano. Good for you. But gushing love for it doesn't change the fact that for some of us, it isn't the second coming. If you dress in such a way and are large enough that you can fit a nano in your pocket and go about your business so that it works for you, great. But many of us choose to dress in such a way that a gun the size of a nano will not be unobtrusive. For me it would look like a brick in my front pocket, and would never even fit in my back pocket. Mild discomfort is one thing, badly uncomfortable is another. What works for you doesn't for me. Try to be objective. |
|
February 16, 2012, 11:44 AM | #30 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
|
Quote:
I'm just saying that Beretta calls the Nano a pocket pistol and IMO it's not. I'm sure it can be carried comfortable in some kind of holster, I'm pretty sure it can't be carried comfortably in a normal average pocket. |
|
February 16, 2012, 02:04 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 4,556
|
Actually, I would prefer- though I haven't handled one yet- the "blockier" grip of the Nano or DB-9 over the LC-9. I really like the LC-9, and may get another if none of the above outshine it, but I'm a sizeable guy with large hands, and a thicker grip would give me better purchase.
I'm looking at depth/length, not weight. I would actually prefer 17 oz over the lighter guns, I'm sure they've gotta be easier on the hand when shooting. Simple physics, there... |
February 16, 2012, 03:49 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2009
Posts: 387
|
CountZero that earlier post comparing the various gun sizes was good; but you left off the width measurement. This is a key dimension in pocket carrying i THINK.
|
February 16, 2012, 04:05 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2010
Location: MPLS, MN
Posts: 1,214
|
I was interested in the Nano until I looked at one. It just didn't impress me. Check out the CZ RAMI for a nice compact 9mm.
__________________
597 VTR, because there's so many cans and so little time! |
February 16, 2012, 05:29 PM | #34 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
|
Added width and slide width.
Some manufacturers don't include slide stop or safeties in their width measurments... Nano is as thin as the PM9 ... |
February 16, 2012, 10:24 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 4,040
|
Quote:
There's folks for whom the Nano is a good choice, but it is very much not going to fit in the same spots where you can easily hide the smaller .380 guns. |
|
February 17, 2012, 07:37 AM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2009
Posts: 387
|
Thanks for the update C0untZer0.
|
February 17, 2012, 08:32 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 4,556
|
^^ ditto, but you should edit the Ruger to LC9 from LCP...
The Kahr might be small enough, but it's $$ removes it from my list. Not saying it's not "worth" it to some, just not to me at $650 for a plastic pocket gun. |
February 17, 2012, 10:02 AM | #38 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
|
LCP
Its weird that I listed it as LCP because I went to LGS to look at the LC9 a few months ago and he gave me the LCP to look at. I thought "Man this little nine is AMAZING !" I was kind of baffled when I saw "380 AUTO" stamped on it... |
February 17, 2012, 11:03 AM | #39 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2007
Location: LANCASTER,OHIO
Posts: 3,944
|
Quote:
__________________
REAL EYES REALIZE REAL LIES |
|
February 17, 2012, 09:43 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2009
Location: Kirkland Wa.
Posts: 516
|
Really people... anything bigger than the LCP, TCP, and all other true pocket guns should be carried IWB or OWB. What kind of baggy pants do some of you wear?
|
February 17, 2012, 10:53 PM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,210
|
Quote:
|
|
February 17, 2012, 10:58 PM | #42 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
|
|
February 17, 2012, 11:06 PM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2005
Location: Concord, NH
Posts: 2,723
|
I brought one home today on an impulse buy. I have not yet fired it, so I can't speak to how it shoots or functions.
My first impression upon holding it was, "Wow... that's a really high bore axis!" However, after comparing it to some other pistols, I've come to the conclusion that it's largely optical illusion. It does have a high bore axis compared to other striker-fired pistols, but it's probably about average when compared to hammer fired guns. I'm not terribly impressed by the grip... it feels too slippery for my taste. I've been carrying a Hi-Power adorned with Gunner grips and grip tape, and I like a gun that sticks to my hand like it was glued there. I'm hoping some talon grips will improve that aspect. I don't have a pocket holster that fits the gun, but I tried it in a Desantis Nemesis made for a J frame. The poor fit of the J frame holster didn't allow the gun to go all the way into the pocket, but I think it has the potential to be quite pocketable in the proper holster. I do not wear skin tight Levis, however. |
February 17, 2012, 11:13 PM | #44 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
|
|
February 17, 2012, 11:21 PM | #45 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
I got a chance to shoot one today. First observation is that it kicks like a mule. Second observation is that it grouped somewhat consistently once I got used to the trigger.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
February 18, 2012, 01:26 AM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
|
I'm one of the bigger Beretta cheerleaders on TFL. I love their guns. The 92 series is my personal idea of handgun perfection, and I trust the PX4 sitting on my nightstand as I type this completely. That said, the Nano I remain lukewarm. Here are my reasons, for what they're worth:
First, my LCP has spoiled me horribly. It was my first carry pistol, so to me very few pistols are true "pocket" pistols. I can cart Elsie into the most gun-hostile social settings, wearing Wranglers or dress slacks, with an extra magazine to boot and never get made. Second, the gun is having ammo issues. Apparently the first-run springs are a bit stiff, and on some guns only hot loads will cycle the Nano reliably. Third, there are just other guns doing it better. The LC9 is a more slender shaped option with a great track record, and for a true "slim nine", the PPS continues to receive glowing reviews as the apex predator of the slim nine ecosystem. I love Beretta, truly a quality arms maker which produces trustworthy and solid guns with a flair for style. They've always struggled with subcompacts, though, and the Nano is so far, sadly, not an exception. |
February 18, 2012, 02:13 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2007
Posts: 1,012
|
Not much to love. Its tall, slabsided and feels funky in the hand. Top heavy and not really that small at all. I hoped and expected more and was disappointed. To many issues reported only adds to the lack of love.
Beretta has been looking for a big seller for quite a while really since the 92 series of guns. The PX4 is a good gun but does not seem to be a big seller amoung the current crop of polymer pistols. Glock, M&P and the XD seem to be the top 3 in sales and popularity. The PX4, P99 and FN pistols seem to trail the others. |
February 18, 2012, 02:23 PM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
|
I concur, roman. The polymer service sector of the market is overwhelmed. The PX4, P99, and FNP are awesome guns, but so are the Glock, M&P, and XD/XDM. Much like the AR, we're reaching a point of market saturation. When it comes to high-cap polymer service weapons, we're spoiled for choice.
|
February 18, 2012, 03:33 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2009
Posts: 387
|
This is aimed at the pocket pistolarena though.
|
February 18, 2012, 06:04 PM | #50 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
|
For some people "pocket pistol" is a category or a description of a pistol type. But for people who actually want a pocket pistol to carry in their pants pockets, why would they get a Beretta Nano when they could get a Rohrbaugh R9 or Kahr PM9, and if it's a budget thing, then why would they could get a Beretta Nano when they could a Kahr CM9 ?
|
|
|