The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 8, 2015, 09:03 PM   #26
Guv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
Nothing wrong with the 41Magnum. I've had several, all good shooters.
Guv is offline  
Old November 9, 2015, 09:36 AM   #27
kcub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,318
For me the fun stops at 41 when it comes to magnum ammo and revolvers.
kcub is offline  
Old November 9, 2015, 12:50 PM   #28
Guv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
I have an 8" octagon 44 mag Contender and a 255gr hard cast SWC over 11grs of Unique are enough for me.
Guv is offline  
Old November 9, 2015, 02:46 PM   #29
rep1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 5, 2009
Location: Mid Western Michigan
Posts: 1,187
Quote:
I have an 8" octagon 44 mag Contender and a 255gr hard cast SWC over 11grs of Unique are enough for me.
As I get older I have to agree. If that won't do it a rifle will. But then again there was a time when I was wild and crazy to.
rep1954 is offline  
Old November 9, 2015, 06:37 PM   #30
jmstr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2001
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Posts: 1,281
I have shot a cylinders worth of .454Casul, and it confirmed that a .44mag is enough for me also!
jmstr is offline  
Old November 9, 2015, 08:22 PM   #31
Ruger45LC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
The Blackhawk .357 is a tank, from my 6.5" it's nothing to run 158 XTP's at 1500 fps, which isn't that impressive compared to the bigger bores but it's "original" .357 Mag ballistics.
Ruger45LC is offline  
Old November 10, 2015, 02:26 AM   #32
kcub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,318
I was handling my 357 Colt SAA and a 45 Colt SAA both with cavalry 7.5" barrels. That 357 is quite a bit heavier, thicker steel in the cylinder and barrel.

I have mammoth ivory grips I was cautioned not to shoot magnums with, do you think it would be ok? For the grips, I know the gun can take it.
kcub is offline  
Old November 10, 2015, 06:53 AM   #33
Guv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
How much are those grips worth and are they delicate? I don't have a clue about the durability but I would wager they are pretty rare and expensive. I bet they look nice!
Guv is offline  
Old November 10, 2015, 09:59 AM   #34
kcub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,318
They are indeed rare and expensive and beautiful.

I suppose the smart thing to do is just swap back to factory original plastique when I have the unquenchable urge to shoot magnum ammo in that particular gun.
kcub is offline  
Old November 10, 2015, 05:33 PM   #35
DWFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2008
Posts: 305
.357-44 B&D, .357 GNR; there is a third option. Get a frame-filling, unchambered Blackhawk cylinder (available from various sources) and chamber it for the .360 Dan Wesson. This is the .357 Maximum shortened to 1.415". Velocities with 140 and 158gr bullets will approach .357 Maximum velocities.Brass is available from Starline.
Actually, the ticket to a hot-rod .357 isn't the Ruger Blackhawk, but the Redhawk. It can be rechambered for the .360 DW and loaded to original .357 Maximum (48-50 kpsi) pressures. The result is a cartridge that surpasses even the .353 Casull. If single actions are your thing, look to a rechambered and rebarreled .22 Hornet BFR.

Last edited by DWFan; November 11, 2015 at 12:50 AM.
DWFan is offline  
Old November 28, 2015, 02:45 PM   #36
ElVaquero
Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2015
Posts: 42
Thought I would Weigh In...

It is true that the 45 Colt cartridge can be "souped up" to 44 mag levels. But why? To me it's like putting one-ton springs on a half-ton pickup and using it for one-ton level tasks. The frame, tranny, and axles aren't up to it, and probably not the engine, either. Likewise, 44 mag guns are built from the ground up to be what they are, do what they were intended to do. In most 45 Colt revolvers (except for Rugers), the frames are lighter, the springs are lighter, the barrels are usually thinner, and the cylinder walls are thinner.

Years ago a friend of mine hot-loaded 45 Colt ammo that he could barely hang onto his 4" Blackhawk with both hands and were punishing to shoot in his Winchester Model 94 Trapper. I bought those guns from him. The Winchester had to be rebuilt, the damage was so heavy, but, as you might guess, the Ruger was as tight as new.
ElVaquero is offline  
Old November 29, 2015, 12:30 PM   #37
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
Quote:
It's always been my opinion that the downsizing of the 357 power wise was done to help promote the larger calibers more.
I have always been of the opinion that it was done to promote its use in smaller guns. One simply cannot shoot (or shoot for very long) the original 1935 load levels in K frame size guns. And don't even think about it in smaller J frame size guns, no matter what the factory says they are rated for.

Even if the GUN can take it, your hands (and your nervous system) are another matter.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old November 29, 2015, 05:04 PM   #38
kcub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,318
On the other hand you can shoot as much hot 357 as you like out of a Ruger SP101 and its just as pocketable as any other steel frame snub. I've shot 200 grain Double Tap out of mine no problem.

It's my pocket skunk ape gun.
kcub is offline  
Old November 29, 2015, 10:53 PM   #39
ElVaquero
Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2015
Posts: 42
Rugers Rock!
ElVaquero is offline  
Old November 30, 2015, 12:09 AM   #40
45 Dragoon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2013
Posts: 656
ElVaquero,
You answered your own question. In your scenario, the Ruger is the 1 ton truck. Everyone agrees and even you said it's up to it so . . . . . what's wrong with hot rodding some .45s and having some fun hualing a "ton" instead of a "half ton".
Besides, it's fun to have a versatile six shooter instead of a gun for every different setup you want to shoot. I have a .45 acp cyl for my El Patron Comp and it's fun to be able to switch but, shooting hot 45s and reg. 45s from the same cyl/same gun is akin to shooting 44 spl in a 44 mag minus the chambering length difference. See, actually makes more sense when you think about it!!

Mike
www.goonsgunworks.com
Follow me on Instagram @ goonsgunworks
45 Dragoon is offline  
Old November 30, 2015, 02:55 PM   #41
Pathfinder45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
Mammoth Ivory grips? Do you have any pix of them on the revolver that you would like to share? Must be eye-candy, right?
Pathfinder45 is offline  
Old November 30, 2015, 10:48 PM   #42
jackmoser65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2014
Posts: 754
Quote:
The frame, tranny, and axles aren't up to it, and probably not the engine, either.
Interesting but a poor analogy.
jackmoser65 is offline  
Old December 1, 2015, 12:20 AM   #43
Kosh75287
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 2007
Posts: 820
I think I'd replace those ivory grips and set them in a place of honor in your gun room.

A great many .45 Colts are not up to much hot-rodding (the conversion replicas, pre-war anything, non-Rugers), but how much hot-rodding does the round really need? 9.5/Herco/250 LSWC gives a shade over 1000 f/s from a 5.5" barrel, and (according to Alliant) does not exceed SAAMI max pressure. Another 0.5 - 1.0 gr. WILL exceed SAAMI max, but not by much, and would likely break 1100 f/s. How much more does one need?

As to the Blackhawk .357, it can be loaded to give true .357 Magnum performance. Striving for performance beyond that will retire a firearm early.
__________________
GOD BLESS JEFF COOPER, whose instructions, consultations, and publications have probably saved more lives than can ever be reliably calculated. DVC, sir.

انجلو. المسلحة. جاهزة. Carpe SCOTCH!

Last edited by Kosh75287; December 1, 2015 at 12:30 AM.
Kosh75287 is offline  
Old December 3, 2015, 09:50 PM   #44
jackmoser65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2014
Posts: 754
Quote:
I have mammoth ivory grips I was cautioned not to shoot magnums with, do you think it would be ok? For the grips, I know the gun can take it.
Fossil ivory grips are usually stabilized, which would make them tougher than most woods.
jackmoser65 is offline  
Old December 4, 2015, 04:21 AM   #45
oldmanFCSA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 8, 2010
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 283
Ruger made a 10" Blackhawk in 357MAXIMUM but stopped production and recovered all revolvers possible due to the jetting action between cylinder and forcing cone causing the bottom side of top strap being cut rather deeply to point of not being safe. The standard pressure of this cartridge was 48,000 PSI and required the use of CCI Small Rifle Magnum primers to retain the pressures generated without lockup of the action. Edited to correct pressure specification error - memory failed me again.

My new revolver was stopped while in shipment to my dealer and sent back to factory for destruction. I had purchased it thru the International Handgun Metallic Shooters Association (IHMSA). My wife purchased the Dan Wesson Model legal as a Production Gun that met weight requirements.

I went back to my Ruger Super Blackhawk 10.5" 44Magnum using 320 grain cast hard projectiles with a gascheck. Bullets were drilled to reduce weight to 220 grains before sealing with application of gascheck. Was very accurate until determined to be non-production and restricted to Unlimited Class only.
__________________
OldmanFCSA = "Oldman" at www.fcsa.org
FCSA Member, SCSA Member, NRA Member, & AMA Member
"Oldage & Treachery will overcome Youth & Skill"

Last edited by oldmanFCSA; December 4, 2015 at 11:44 AM.
oldmanFCSA is offline  
Old December 4, 2015, 11:04 AM   #46
jackmoser65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2014
Posts: 754
Operating pressures for the .357Maximum are 48,000CUP, which is a long way from 62,000psi. The flame cutting was only an issue for those who were running lightweight bullets of 110-125gr over heavy doses of spherical powder. The heavier bullets the cartridge was designed for proved a non-issue. It's shameful that Ruger has destroyed so many of these fine guns, due to the actions of idiots trying to turn a revolver into a rifle.
jackmoser65 is offline  
Old December 4, 2015, 11:49 AM   #47
oldmanFCSA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 8, 2010
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 283
JackMoser65,

You are correct sir - I edited my posting to show correct pressure.

I loaded 180 grain Truncated Cone FMJ's - forget the powder and charge - for my now ex-wife's Dan Wesson revolver in 357 Maximum.
__________________
OldmanFCSA = "Oldman" at www.fcsa.org
FCSA Member, SCSA Member, NRA Member, & AMA Member
"Oldage & Treachery will overcome Youth & Skill"
oldmanFCSA is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 03:38 PM   #48
Creek Henry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 23, 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 514
360 Dan Wesson... Pushed to 40kPsi this load is said to push the 357 to a new level of performance
Creek Henry is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 04:13 PM   #49
ElVaquero
Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2015
Posts: 42
KCub, where did you get 200 grain bullets for .357? I thought they were long out of production.
ElVaquero is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 11:48 PM   #50
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
If you want to push it get an Encore. Lots of guys push it pretty hard in an encore.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.18003 seconds with 10 queries