The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 3, 2009, 07:03 AM   #26
alloy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
Thanks jimpeel. As stated in the last link in Antipitas's post, its a confusing maze of laws in some areas. Would be easier if they just used the state laws for all issues...as the National Forests do.

Antipitas, i am assuming this still goes into effect and the reaction from the Brady group is the standard response to any legislation they see as unfavorable?

As if a bear or mountian lion knows its in a park, the complaint is rediculous. Again...assuming a person with foul intent is gonna adhere to some law...seems to be their standard line.
__________________
Quote:
The uncomfortable question common to all who have had revolutionary changes imposed on them: are we now to accept what was done to us just because it was done?
Angelo Codevilla
alloy is offline  
Old January 3, 2009, 12:04 PM   #27
Al Norris
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
alloy, I expect we will see a ruling on the preliminary injunction sometime in the coming week. Without the injunction, the new rule will have force on Friday, Jan. 9th.
Al Norris is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04963 seconds with 8 queries