|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 16, 2013, 01:09 AM | #1 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
World-wide, Gun Bans Breed Defiance
I have always pretty much figured that if it actually came to registration, or heavens forbid, confiscation, that most in the US would roll over. It appears I may be wrong.
According to an article by J.D. Tuccille, world-wide, and even here in the US, defiance of radical gun restrictions are the natural order. Gun Restrictions Have Always Bred Defiance, Black Markets - Reason.com A very good article that appears to honestly say that people just won't follow unjust law. |
January 16, 2013, 01:40 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,128
|
Thanks for sharing that, Al. Very interesting read. Those numbers raised my eyebrows!
__________________
'Merica: Back to back World War Champs |
January 16, 2013, 01:59 AM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: September 15, 2012
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
I have NO intentions of "rolling over". I also have no qualms about who will be "playing dead" either. (Ill give you a hint; it won't be me) |
|
January 16, 2013, 02:36 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: July 11, 2012
Posts: 59
|
Great article. Thanks for sharing.
|
January 16, 2013, 02:54 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 779
|
I just read this stuff.
And I feel like the crazy person in the room who thinks bans don't work. But they don't...
__________________
I told the new me, "Meet me at the bus station and hold a sign that reads: 'Today is the first day of the rest of your life.'" But the old me met me with a sign that read: "Welcome back." Who you are is not a function of where you are. -Off Minor |
January 16, 2013, 03:07 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: July 11, 2012
Posts: 59
|
Name one prohibition that worked. Just one.
|
January 16, 2013, 03:54 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
|
At least I know I won't be alone, I already have a great deal of contempt for our government at large, they are making it worse on almost a daily basis.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999 "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason |
January 16, 2013, 11:12 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: June 16, 2011
Posts: 20
|
Prohibibition: Highest crime rate in USA ever.
"Effective enforcement of the alcohol ban during the Prohibition Era proved to be very difficult and led to widespread flouting of the law. The lack of a solid popular consensus for the ban resulted in the growth of vast criminal organizations, including the modern American Mafia, and various other criminal cliques. Widespread disregard of the law also generated rampant corruption among politicians and within police forces."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibi..._United_States |
January 16, 2013, 11:16 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
My ancestors made a good bit of lucre back when alcohol was banned. (Shifty Sicilians, oh my...) Seems many of their customers were the wealthy and the politically connected, too.
Lessons: 1 - Bans don't work. 2 - Bans are for the little people. |
January 16, 2013, 12:47 PM | #10 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Quote:
But, will all the guns get turned in? Not if the historical trend holds. Canada, Australia, and the UK are estimated to average a 20% compliance rate with their bans. I went shooting in Victoria in 1994, and there were a lot of guns that came out when nobody was looking. Most folks admitted to owning guns off the registry. It was routinely flaunted. My sister and her husband were in Cairo during the revolution a couple of years back, and when the police absconded, pretty much everyone in the neighborhood started digging guns out of the closet they'd "forgotten" they had. The same holds true in places like New York and Maryland. Guns may be turned into a dirty little secret, but they'll still be there.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
January 16, 2013, 01:56 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,315
|
That^^^ for sure. +1
|
January 16, 2013, 02:44 PM | #12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2009
Posts: 8
|
good article, thanks for linking it
|
January 16, 2013, 02:46 PM | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2009
Posts: 8
|
wow, I know I tend to be a lurker, but I thought I had more posts than that!
|
January 16, 2013, 02:51 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 779
|
Quote:
I have nothing to argue from or with, but I just don't see it ending "peacefully"
__________________
I told the new me, "Meet me at the bus station and hold a sign that reads: 'Today is the first day of the rest of your life.'" But the old me met me with a sign that read: "Welcome back." Who you are is not a function of where you are. -Off Minor |
|
January 16, 2013, 11:32 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 24, 2011
Posts: 730
|
Well, at least in Canada, they got tired enough of wasting money on something that obviously did not work, they actually elected a PM that actively campaigned on removing the long gun registration.
Too bad he hasn't mannaged to do the same with handguns. |
January 17, 2013, 04:00 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
|
Wow, I didn't realize compliance rates were THAT low, across so many places.
|
January 17, 2013, 04:12 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2006
Posts: 737
|
I'm not defiant. The current government is. I have the 2nd Amendment on my side. In that, it is very clear what is and is not allowed.
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" Oxford Dictionary's definition of infringe: 1 actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.): 2 act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on The government has no legal right to take away or limit in this case. Therefor, any law created to limit my rights is an unconstitutional law by a defiant government. |
January 17, 2013, 04:47 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,315
|
We can learn much from our neighbors to the north. Raising hell ain't it.
I just know we can make it through many more media cycles without loosing our cool. Even 911 slipped the media attention span relatively quickly. Use the courts and money to slow this freight train down, and let the anti's wear themselves to a frazzle. We ought to know about the fleeting focus of the media by now. |
January 17, 2013, 05:11 PM | #19 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
There is a movie where a person rents a gun in Japan for 6 hours or something then returns it after using it to kill someone. I thought that had to be made up, then did some research and found that for a considerable time in post-war Japan there were in fact illegal gun rentals for carrying out crimes. Craziest criminal behavior or economic market I ever heard of, well with the exception of women's hand bags.
I have heard that support of a "revolution" in the colonies in the days before "the shot heard 'round the world" hovered around 5%. Once it was apparent armed conflict was coming and there was no avoiding it, that number grew very quickly. Prior to the Civil War it seems there were similar although not as low numbers. We have probably all seen figures for percentage of Muslims that are "radicalized" yet we have two wars and many more theaters of operation(most of which aren't going so well). Before we go in the numbers usually hover around the 15%, then as soon as US troops land they soar. A small minority can force widespread conflict. Anyone need a diplomat? |
January 17, 2013, 10:02 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,137
|
If they ever passed a ban, I would sell every single gun I own before the ban went into effect. I would expect a lot of us here to do the same thing.
|
January 18, 2013, 12:19 AM | #21 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Quote:
Jeff Knox observed that around 6% of gun owners participate in even the most rudimentary political activism. We can't even agree on a political candidate. Why should we expect a large group to unite under a single banner? More daunting to this ragtag group would be the fact that they would be branded as terrorists. They'd lose touch with their families, their homes, their possessions, and many would die. They wouldn't be remembered as heroes or martyrs. The media would paint them as unhinged lunatics, and the end result would be the implied justification for even more repressive laws. If the average American can't even be troubled to vote, how can we expect them to take those kinds of risks? We're far better off keeping such bans from happening in the first place.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
January 18, 2013, 11:49 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I agree.
Look how the Average American probably views the Branch Davidian or Ruby Ridge incidents. Most probably don't even remember them. Very few would think of them as unjustified violence by federal agents, but they were. In both cases, arresting the primary targets when they were not surrounded by family and friends would have been feasible - in the case of Randy Weaver, he unknowingly had stopped to offer assistance to a couple feds whom he thought had suffered a vehicle breakdown. Bad tactical decisions were made, unnecessary gunfights were initiated, and innocent parties (women and kids) were killed in both incidents. And Joe Blow has no idea... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|