The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 5, 2013, 04:51 PM   #1
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
A calibre question, not a calibre war.

Rather than trying to dissect the perceived merits of one calibre over another in a real world setting where actual gun choice can have a huge impact on calibre choice I decided to provide us with a hypothetical weapon platform that should set up an equitable stage for comparing relative performance:
A single shot pistol...

There are 3 calibres I hear mentioned in many concealed carry situations that are common, despite not having the punch of the ubiquitous 9x19:

.38Spl, 9x18 and 9x17.

Now again, some of these come as HPs but I understand none make the fullest use of a hollow-point's possible expansion so let's also say these all had to be FMJs.

I will allow variation in bullet weight and profile, as long as they are FMJs and standard pressures: no +Ps.

We can suggest the most popular range of bullet sizes, so 125-158gr for the .38 and 80-100gr for the .380ACP
The Makarov I'm less familiar with so I will go with the same as .380ACP: 80-100gr.

So if, for whatever reason you choose to imagine, you were restricted to a single shot pistol for concealed carry, which weight of FMJ would you carry in which calibre?

When we cut through innumerable variations and try to get to the essence of what each can provide, which would you prefer. You don't even need to justify it!!

Before you ask why I will tell you: curiosity.
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 04:58 PM   #2
KMAX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,185
158gr 38 Special. I like a heavier bullet. Not really sure why, mostly habit I guess.
__________________
This is my gun. There are many like her, but this one is mine.

I'm not old. I'm CLASSIC!
KMAX is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 05:18 PM   #3
DavidAGO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 7, 2008
Location: Magnolia, AR
Posts: 340
+1 , .38 spl, +p. I like heavier projectiles. it also is what I have, since you did not include .380

David
DavidAGO is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 05:22 PM   #4
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
Quote:
+1 , .38 spl, +p. I like heavier projectiles. it also is what I have, since you did not include .380
Please re-read my OP.

.380 is listed - as far as I am aware, .380ACP and 9x17 are one and the same.
I also implemented a "no +P allowed" clause.

With that info re-clarified, would .38 still be your choice?
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 05:56 PM   #5
DavidAGO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 7, 2008
Location: Magnolia, AR
Posts: 340
I apologize, I did not realize the .380 was the same as the 9X17, or close enough for your comparison purposes. I do have a .380, I do carry it upon occasion, the ruger LCP just fits better in a pants pocket than my .38. but my choice given your parameters would still be the .38, no +p.

David
DavidAGO is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 06:13 PM   #6
jhenry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,840
With bullet diameter in the three examples being close enough to be considered the same, and velocities being in the same neighborhood, and all three being limited to FMJ, the only real variable to contend with is weight. The .38 Special can handle a much heavier bullet. It wins.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer
jhenry is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 06:15 PM   #7
g.willikers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
If I only had a single shot pistol, The caliber would be of a secondary consideration.
I'd pick the heaviest one that could do double duty as a club.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez:
“Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.”
g.willikers is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 06:23 PM   #8
gotthegoods
Member
 
Join Date: September 11, 2011
Posts: 65
Since it's all FMJ, how about 147gr 9mm, typically more bullets and faster re-load than a revolver
gotthegoods is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 06:43 PM   #9
RBid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 10, 2012
Posts: 1,059
A calibre question, not a calibre war.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g.willikers View Post
If I only had a single shot pistol, The caliber would be of a secondary consideration.
I'd pick the heaviest one that could do double duty as a club.
G and I have disagreed on some things before, but we're singing songs at the same campfire on this one. Big time.
RBid is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 06:55 PM   #10
RX-79G
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 27, 2013
Posts: 1,139
With those rounds in FMJ, I don't think bullet weight matters at all. They are all going to poke clean 9mm diameter holes through the target, so it can't matter much. The fact that one was slower, faster, more inertia, less isn't going to matter if all of them travel all the way through in a fraction of a second.

It is something like asking if it would hurt more to be cut with a stainless vs. carbon steel knife. A cut's a cut and a hole is a hole.
RX-79G is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 07:41 PM   #11
jhenry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,840
Not when you factor in clothing and bones. Weight equals inertia, and inertia will take the slug further. I don't know if anyone here does any actual handgun hunting, but there is a reason we use heavy slugs even if it costs some velocity.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer

Last edited by jhenry; November 5, 2013 at 07:52 PM.
jhenry is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 08:07 PM   #12
LE-28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 24, 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 759
I to, would choose the .38 spl with the 158gr bullet. They are easier to re- load for and in my opinion, more versatile.
LE-28 is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 08:23 PM   #13
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
158 grain .38
Hawg is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 08:25 PM   #14
3.Shot.Group.
Junior member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2013
Posts: 208
158gr .38 BBWB
3.Shot.Group. is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 08:30 PM   #15
SDC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2001
Location: People's Republic of Kanada
Posts: 1,652
Among those three, the choice of the actual pistol used ends up playing a bigger role in my mind, and since the 380 and 9mm Mak are essentially a tie, I'd probably have to choose a slim 380 (Sig 230 or similar) over a 6-shot 38 revolver.
__________________
Gun control in Canada: making the streets safer for rapists, muggers, and other violent criminals since 1936.
SDC is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 08:39 PM   #16
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
One of the OP's conditions was a single shot pistol, so in this game, the SIG and the revolver are not options.

FWIW, both the 9x18's (Makarov and Ultra) are considerably more powerful than the .380, though both come in under the 9mm Parabellum.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old November 5, 2013, 09:06 PM   #17
Rob62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 28, 1999
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 560
Another vote for .38 Special with 158 grain bullets.
__________________
NRA & NAHC Life Member
Rob62 is offline  
Old November 6, 2013, 12:33 AM   #18
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
More case capacity in the .38sp.
Buzzcook is offline  
Old November 6, 2013, 01:48 AM   #19
JD0x0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2013
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
So if, for whatever reason you choose to imagine, you were restricted to a single shot pistol for concealed carry, which weight of FMJ would you carry in which calibre?
I would take whatever lets me use the heaviest bullets, with the most relative energy. I am not concerned with 'stopping power' or 'punch' as these don't really exist in reality. I want the deepest penetrating bullet possible, if I cannot create significant hydrostatic shock through high velocity. (which, generally wont happen with pistols, since velocity is low) I want the bullet to go all the way through my target, no matter how heavy their clothes, or what bones the bullet hits, I want it to keep moving, enough to create an exit wound. It's also nice to have the ability to shoot through light cover, that your target may be behind, while also still having significant penetration on the target, after passing through the barrier.
For the best penetration you want the highest sectional density possible. This generally means you want the heaviest longest bullet you can practically use.
I don't mind sacrificing velocity for bullet weight, but I'd prefer to at least have my heavy bullets just under the speed of sound. This is why I like loads like 147grn 9x19 @ about 1000fps, or .40S&W with 200grn between 900-1000fps.

Between the 9x17, 9x18, and .38spl if I only have a single shot weapon, I'd have to go with the revolver cartridge. All 3 develop similar energy, which is fairly low, the .38 at least has the ability to go up to and possibly exceed 200grain bullets. Where as the auto cartridges are pretty much maxed out @ 100grains factory loads and 124 grain, if you hand load, and if you're lucky enough not to have case bulging with that weight bullet.
JD0x0 is offline  
Old November 6, 2013, 06:53 PM   #20
kirbinster
Member
 
Join Date: March 10, 2013
Posts: 54
Back when the police used to use revolvers the .38 special was know as the widow maker, as so many woman that were married to cops that used them ended up as widows. Go with a .357 Magnum instead.
kirbinster is offline  
Old November 6, 2013, 07:24 PM   #21
jhenry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,840
Read the OP's post. There is no .357 involved here.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer
jhenry is offline  
Old November 6, 2013, 07:54 PM   #22
Hal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
Quote:
Read the OP's post. There is no .357 involved here.
Maybe - maybe not...

Elmer Keith loaded up some potent stuff in the .38 spl that rivaled the .357 max (note - not .357 magnum).

.38 spl brass is extremely strong and can stand up to some monster pressures.

Given the OP's limitations, I'd be inclined to go with a .38spl case, a 173 grain bullet and a big dose of Alliant 2400.
Hal is offline  
Old November 6, 2013, 08:24 PM   #23
mavracer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,209
Hal OP says no +p so Keith loads are defiantly out of contention.
For my answer I'd go with the 38. Crush cavity is the major wounding factor when discussing handguns especially in these calibers and momentum is really what you need to look at when modeling permanent crush cavity.
__________________
rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6
Quote:
originally posted my Mike Irwin
My handguns are are for one purpose only, though...
The starter gun on the "Fat man's mad dash tactical retreat."
mavracer is offline  
Old November 6, 2013, 09:17 PM   #24
jhenry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,840
Quote:
Elmer Keith loaded up some potent stuff in the .38 spl that rivaled the .357 max (note - not .357 magnum).
Again....read the OP. No +P even, so certainly no Keith loads. In addition, while some of his and Phill Sharpe's loads rivaled .357 loads, and were in fact the impetus for the .357 S+W magnum, they were no where near .357 Max. territory. You can fill a .38 case full with 2400 and a 173 grain actual Keith slug and not get there. Not enough capacity.

I have done it with Keith's loads and real deal Keith bullets over a chrono. You can get them humming right along, but there are physical limitations.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer
jhenry is offline  
Old November 6, 2013, 09:26 PM   #25
dakota.potts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Posts: 3,084
I'd say a .38 of those, but I don't know enough to pick any particular bullet weight.
__________________
Certified Gunsmith (On Hiatus)
Certified Armorer - H&K and Glock Among Others
You can find my writings at my website, pottsprecision.com.
dakota.potts is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11794 seconds with 10 queries