The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 20, 2010, 08:15 AM   #51
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
"Same results"

Maybe just maybe from the muzzle end (maybe), but most definitely NOT on the end we hold on to......



Think think think think think, ay?
__________________
.
"all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo"
WESHOOT2 is offline  
Old June 20, 2010, 11:17 PM   #52
stevedscross
Member
 
Join Date: June 5, 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 48
Just to correct the U.S. Secret Service carries the Sig P229 in .357 sig not in 40 S&W. However the US Coast Gaurd uses the P229 in .40.
ICE uses the H&K in .40. The guy who said Air Marshalls carry in .357 sig is also correct they don't carry a .40. There are also other agentcies that carry a .40 like BATF, USMS, both list it as optional.
I can't remember where FBI is in things now but they issue one of five guns and allow others. Last I checked they issue either a Glock 22, G23, G17, G19, and of course the 1911 for the HRT teams.
stevedscross is offline  
Old June 21, 2010, 07:38 AM   #53
zenner22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2006
Posts: 229
ICE carries Sig 229s in 40.
zenner22 is offline  
Old June 21, 2010, 08:43 AM   #54
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,380
Why?

Because it was an administrative decision based on a recommendation from a panel that chose the original duty weapon in the first place.

After that ammunition supply is more a factor of lowest bid based on issued specifications rather than that same panel going over reams of ballistics data.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old June 21, 2010, 01:27 PM   #55
scorpiusdeus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2007
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 300
scorpiusdeus is offline  
Old June 22, 2010, 10:41 AM   #56
Mike-Mat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2010
Location: Phoenix area
Posts: 361
Why? Because they can afford to but whatever they want. After all, they have our money to do it with. You dont have to make good/smart decisions when you have unlimited funds.

Sure the 9mm would work fine. But there's a new toy on the block and they all want one. .40S&W for Everyone. Woo Woo !
__________________
Mike Mattera - Tips For Mfg
Video Training For CadCam Systems
http://www.tipsforcadcam.com
Mike-Mat is offline  
Old June 22, 2010, 11:03 AM   #57
tipoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
Let's keep this thread going!

tipoc is offline  
Old June 22, 2010, 11:17 AM   #58
Mike-Mat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2010
Location: Phoenix area
Posts: 361
After you wrap that cat in foil, how long do you have to cook it?
__________________
Mike Mattera - Tips For Mfg
Video Training For CadCam Systems
http://www.tipsforcadcam.com
Mike-Mat is offline  
Old June 22, 2010, 11:26 AM   #59
Adrian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 7, 2007
Location: Free of California!
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgcoastie
Do you honestly think any of the firearms, ammunition, and weapon accessory companies are hurting for cash?

Where have you been for the past two years?
I don't know about tipoc, but I watched ATK's stock lose 30%, unfortunately...

But then the bailout should be going to Federal, not Winchester. Olin's doing fine.
__________________
NRA Life Member since January 2009
Matt.25:40
Adrian is offline  
Old June 22, 2010, 03:09 PM   #60
indykappa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: charlotte, nc (but indianapolis is home)
Posts: 100
not an expert...

i am not an expert, and don't have alot of experience with the 40s&w round (although i will be picking one up in a month)...

but i am with WESHOOT (post #48)...what if they purchased this round because it works?!

i know it's a light round...i get that. but what if it REALLY DOES WORK?

i found it a bit interesting that nobody replied to WESHOOT's last comment
indykappa is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 08:22 AM   #61
TampaJim
Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 68
Quote:
why the 135 at such a low velocity?
Since when is 1200 fps "low velocity"?
__________________
"Count not him among your friends who will retail your privacies to the world."
- Publilius Syrus (1st guy ever on a mailing list)
TampaJim is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 08:33 AM   #62
pythagorean
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 970
I don't really appreciate the .40 SW I admit it. I had one in a Browning Hi Power. It was a great gun but the round is an "in between" in my mind to the 9mm and .45.
Funny thing is the .41 Magnum was an "in between" but it packs a LOT more punch than the auto round.

So why did Homeland Security buy those 40SW rounds?

I can think of another question that questions the effectiveness of Homeland Security altogether and that makes me mum on this one.
pythagorean is offline  
Old June 23, 2010, 01:14 PM   #63
scorpiusdeus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2007
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 300
Size, Speed, and capacity, the .40 S&W offers the best of all three.

It's bigger than a 9mm, faster than a .45, and comes in MANY platforms that have reasonable capacity, not much less than 9mm and much more than .45.

I own 4 different brands of handgun .40 S&W that I can have a 9mm barrel and mags for, and .357 Sig barrels for.

In these handguns I have three potential calibers in one weapon.

What's not to love?

I'm unaware of any study showing the the .40 S&W is any worse and dispatching bad guys than 9mm or .45.

All we're really talking about here is preference ans prejudice.

I don't dislike ANY caliber that may save my life some day.
scorpiusdeus is offline  
Old June 25, 2010, 10:07 PM   #64
Erik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
I know a variety of personnel spread across DHS components which carry pistols chambered in .357 Sig and .40 S&W. Of those with the 40s, none can recall being issued anything other than 155 and 180 grain varieties from various manufacturers.
__________________
Meriam Webster's: Main Entry: ci·vil·ian Pronunciation: \sə-ˈvil-yən also -ˈvi-yən\, Function: noun, Date: 14th century, 1: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law, 2 a: one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force b: outsider 1, — civilian adjective

Last edited by Erik; June 26, 2010 at 08:02 PM.
Erik is offline  
Old June 25, 2010, 10:28 PM   #65
scorpion_tyr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 10, 2008
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,326
Quote:
You can get the same results with 125 grain 9mm at 1250 fps
No, you can't. 9mm is smaller around than .40. Bigger bullets make bigger holes. The bigger the hole, the more blood that comes out, so the faster the kill. Velocity and energy don't mean crap until you get into the rifle ammo.
__________________
“Nature intended me for the tranquil pursuits of science, by rendering them my supreme delight.” - Thomas Jefferson
scorpion_tyr is offline  
Old June 27, 2010, 03:22 PM   #66
Mal H
Staff
 
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 16,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super-Dave
Why did homeland security buy millions of 135 grain .40?
Answer: Because they needed them.

Closed.
Mal H is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09006 seconds with 8 queries