|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 10, 2011, 12:03 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
|
Anybody use Titegroup in .41 Magnum?
I have a little less than 1/2 pound of Titegroup powder than I want to use up. So I thought .41 Mag might be a good candidate because it generally takes a lot of powder. I will be using Lee 210 grain cast bullets.
Does 8.5 grains of TG sound about right? I thought I'd start at 8 and work up towards 9 grains. If it makes any difference I'll be shooting these in a Ruger Blackhawk. I think leading is going to be the limiting factor here, even with a fast powder. (The bullets are made of water-dropped pistol range scrap, and they've aged about a month since I cast them.)
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth |
December 10, 2011, 12:27 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2008
Location: 8B ID
Posts: 1,753
|
I do.
But, I use it for ".41 Special" loads in my 6.5" Blackhawk. 4.5 grains of Titegroup and a 215 grain lead SWC (doing about 875 fps or so). Makes for a pleasant shooting and accurate plinking round. Hodgdon lists 5.5 grains (1,004 fps) as their max load for that powder, don't think I would start at 8 grains, maybe 5 and work up from that.
__________________
The answer to 1984 is 1776 |
December 10, 2011, 10:10 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
|
Leading is not near as big of a factor when the bullets are sized to fit the bore. Hardess is debatable. Fit is king. Not that asside I would recomend sticking to published loads. If you want more velocity use a different powder.
8.0 grains is nearly twice the max of any of Hodgdon's listed loads. Using a load like that is probably going damage something like your gun, yourself, and anyone and anything near where you are shooting Note I load .41 mag. I cast my own 210 grain LSWC. I liked using TiteGroup 4.8 - 5.0 grains, then Swithced to Trail Boss for target loads. For warmer loads I use Acurate Arms #9.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you. |
December 10, 2011, 10:53 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 36
|
NO ! STOP !
8 gr too much TG for most 41 mag bullets. Check the loads at http://www.hodgdon.com/ and choose something recommended by the powder manufacturer. Be Safe and have fun ! -steve |
December 10, 2011, 03:15 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
|
Hodgdon's only has very low-pressure loads listed -- 15000 CUP. Like they were trying to make .38-40 Cowboy loads out of the .41 Magnum. (Alliant did the same thing with their load data a couple of years ago)
I checked Lyman's #48 and it doesn't have much data for this cartridge. Maybe I should just use .357 Magnums or 9mm to burn up this powder.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth |
December 10, 2011, 05:15 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,197
|
I wouldn't use Titegroup in anything approaching higher pressures.
38Spl or 45acp are OK as far as I'm concerned. I know of more than a few 500 S&W Magnums, Titegroup has blown up with published loads. |
December 10, 2011, 06:36 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 27, 2009
Location: Zona
Posts: 423
|
Quote:
The OP needs to buy and use a modern reloading manual, or learn to find tested data on-line. Asking on a forum if a particular load is "safe" is dicey at best, and dangerous at worst.... . |
|
December 10, 2011, 10:42 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,429
|
TG is just not the powder to use in the mighty 41 mag, use up your TG in 9mm.
__________________
I'm not just a gun. I'm YOUR gun. (Hold me.) |
December 10, 2011, 11:32 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
|
Quickload says the load I want is safe, but that doesn't mean it's advisable. I have a .41 load that I like with this bullet, so maybe I ought to stick with that and use up the TG in 9mm. It doesn't take much powder per shot, but it's easy to burn thru a lot of 9 at a time, so that might actually use it up faster.
Thanks.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth |
December 11, 2011, 12:21 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
December 12, 2011, 08:09 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,197
|
Sure FrankenMauser,
Here's one of the links entitled "Why I don't use Titegroup in the 500". http://smith-wessonforum.com/reloadi...oup-500-a.html |
December 13, 2011, 01:46 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
I don't buy it.
You have a guy claiming to have seen 3 of these revolvers blown up by 17 gr of Titegroup behind a 370 gr (or lighter) lead projectile... but there isn't any supporting evidence. In a glaring example; half way through his post, he makes this statement: Quote:
It doesn't matter if you're light or heavy. If you're deviating from the published data, then it is NOT a published load. And, lastly... Hodgdon knows the powder better than anyone else. If they won't replace the firearm and say it was a double charge, it was double charge. Hodgdon goes out of their way to make sure their customers are happy, except when they know the customer was the idiot that caused the problem.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
December 13, 2011, 07:48 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: The retarded place below Idaho
Posts: 1,408
|
Quote:
I have had a firearm replaced by Hodgdon, the testing and process is pretty involved. If they say he over charged it I believe thats what happened.
__________________
The best shot I ever made was an accident |
|
December 13, 2011, 07:48 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,197
|
I believe John Ross 100%. Trust me, he has no reason to lie.
He was instrumental in the development of the 500 cartridge and the S&W handguns that fire them. That's why he has a S&W model named after him. |
December 13, 2011, 09:12 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
If Hodgdon says it was a double charge, it was a double charge.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|