The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 10, 2011, 12:03 AM   #1
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
Anybody use Titegroup in .41 Magnum?

I have a little less than 1/2 pound of Titegroup powder than I want to use up. So I thought .41 Mag might be a good candidate because it generally takes a lot of powder. I will be using Lee 210 grain cast bullets.

Does 8.5 grains of TG sound about right? I thought I'd start at 8 and work up towards 9 grains. If it makes any difference I'll be shooting these in a Ruger Blackhawk. I think leading is going to be the limiting factor here, even with a fast powder. (The bullets are made of water-dropped pistol range scrap, and they've aged about a month since I cast them.)
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old December 10, 2011, 12:27 AM   #2
Crankylove
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2008
Location: 8B ID
Posts: 1,753
I do.

But, I use it for ".41 Special" loads in my 6.5" Blackhawk.

4.5 grains of Titegroup and a 215 grain lead SWC (doing about 875 fps or so). Makes for a pleasant shooting and accurate plinking round.

Hodgdon lists 5.5 grains (1,004 fps) as their max load for that powder, don't think I would start at 8 grains, maybe 5 and work up from that.
__________________
The answer to 1984 is 1776
Crankylove is offline  
Old December 10, 2011, 10:10 AM   #3
m&p45acp10+1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
Leading is not near as big of a factor when the bullets are sized to fit the bore. Hardess is debatable. Fit is king. Not that asside I would recomend sticking to published loads. If you want more velocity use a different powder.

8.0 grains is nearly twice the max of any of Hodgdon's listed loads. Using a load like that is probably going damage something like your gun, yourself, and anyone and anything near where you are shooting


Note I load .41 mag. I cast my own 210 grain LSWC. I liked using TiteGroup 4.8 - 5.0 grains, then Swithced to Trail Boss for target loads. For warmer loads I use Acurate Arms #9.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you.
m&p45acp10+1 is offline  
Old December 10, 2011, 10:53 AM   #4
srsmith
Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 36
NO ! STOP !

8 gr too much TG for most 41 mag bullets.

Check the loads at http://www.hodgdon.com/ and choose something recommended by the powder manufacturer.

Be Safe and have fun !

-steve
srsmith is offline  
Old December 10, 2011, 03:15 PM   #5
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
Hodgdon's only has very low-pressure loads listed -- 15000 CUP. Like they were trying to make .38-40 Cowboy loads out of the .41 Magnum. (Alliant did the same thing with their load data a couple of years ago)

I checked Lyman's #48 and it doesn't have much data for this cartridge.

Maybe I should just use .357 Magnums or 9mm to burn up this powder.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old December 10, 2011, 05:15 PM   #6
bluetopper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,197
I wouldn't use Titegroup in anything approaching higher pressures.

38Spl or 45acp are OK as far as I'm concerned.

I know of more than a few 500 S&W Magnums, Titegroup has blown up with published loads.
bluetopper is offline  
Old December 10, 2011, 06:36 PM   #7
TX Nimrod
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 27, 2009
Location: Zona
Posts: 423
Quote:
Hodgdon's only has very low-pressure loads listed -- 15000 CUP.
What? Hodgon's 2011 manual lists 7.4 grains of Tightgroup under a .41 Magnum 210-grain bullet at 33,200 CUP.

The OP needs to buy and use a modern reloading manual, or learn to find tested data on-line. Asking on a forum if a particular load is "safe" is dicey at best, and dangerous at worst....


.
TX Nimrod is offline  
Old December 10, 2011, 10:42 PM   #8
caz223
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,429
TG is just not the powder to use in the mighty 41 mag, use up your TG in 9mm.
__________________
I'm not just a gun.
I'm YOUR gun.
(Hold me.)
caz223 is offline  
Old December 10, 2011, 11:32 PM   #9
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
Quickload says the load I want is safe, but that doesn't mean it's advisable. I have a .41 load that I like with this bullet, so maybe I ought to stick with that and use up the TG in 9mm. It doesn't take much powder per shot, but it's easy to burn thru a lot of 9 at a time, so that might actually use it up faster.

Thanks.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old December 11, 2011, 12:21 AM   #10
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Quote:
I know of more than a few 500 S&W Magnums, Titegroup has blown up with published loads.
I'm sorry, but I don't believe that. I must assume there were unmentioned variables (change in bullet, change in OAL, etc), unless you can provide links to the firearms you're referencing.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old December 12, 2011, 08:09 PM   #11
bluetopper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,197
Sure FrankenMauser,

Here's one of the links entitled "Why I don't use Titegroup in the 500".

http://smith-wessonforum.com/reloadi...oup-500-a.html
bluetopper is offline  
Old December 13, 2011, 01:46 AM   #12
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
I don't buy it.

You have a guy claiming to have seen 3 of these revolvers blown up by 17 gr of Titegroup behind a 370 gr (or lighter) lead projectile... but there isn't any supporting evidence.

In a glaring example; half way through his post, he makes this statement:
Quote:
He said his load was a charge of Titegroup that was a few grains below the starting recommendation with a lightweight cast bullet. He believes he got detonation. Hodgdon says that’s impossible, and that he loaded a double charge.
If he was a "few" grains below a starting charge, that would be somewhere between 8 and 13 grains of Titegroup (based on published data) - NOT the 17 grains claimed at the beginning of the post. But, the author of the post doesn't divulge the actual charge, or components. And... "a few grains below the starting recommendation" is not published data. That's "I pulled this out of my rear orifice" data.

It doesn't matter if you're light or heavy. If you're deviating from the published data, then it is NOT a published load.


And, lastly...
Hodgdon knows the powder better than anyone else. If they won't replace the firearm and say it was a double charge, it was double charge.
Hodgdon goes out of their way to make sure their customers are happy, except when they know the customer was the idiot that caused the problem.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old December 13, 2011, 07:48 AM   #13
cornbush
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: The retarded place below Idaho
Posts: 1,408
Quote:
Hodgdon knows the powder better than anyone else. If they won't replace the firearm and say it was a double charge, it was double charge.
Hodgdon goes out of their way to make sure their customers are happy, except when they know the customer was the idiot that caused the problem.
What he said ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I have had a firearm replaced by Hodgdon, the testing and process is pretty involved. If they say he over charged it I believe thats what happened.
__________________
The best shot I ever made was an accident
cornbush is offline  
Old December 13, 2011, 07:48 PM   #14
bluetopper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,197
I believe John Ross 100%. Trust me, he has no reason to lie.

He was instrumental in the development of the 500 cartridge and the S&W handguns that fire them. That's why he has a S&W model named after him.
bluetopper is offline  
Old December 13, 2011, 09:12 PM   #15
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Quote:
I believe John Ross 100%. Trust me, he has no reason to lie.

He was instrumental in the development of the 500 cartridge and the S&W handguns that fire them. That's why he has a S&W model named after him.
Believe him all you want... It doesn't change the fact that HE hasn't had one blow up. All of the claims are based on second-hand anecdotal evidence. There is nothing to truly back up the claims of published loads blowing up .500 S&W revolvers.

If Hodgdon says it was a double charge, it was a double charge.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08078 seconds with 10 queries