The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 27, 2013, 09:37 AM   #1
DarthNul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 288
IMR4895 isn't metering well... what to use instead?

I've had very limited powder choices for my .223 Rem loading. I got a few pounds of IMR4895 when my local reloading store got a shipment.

I worked up a load with 62gr Nosler varmageddon bullets that shoots pretty well and I hoped to use it for weekly highpower league. THe problem is that I trickled every charge when I was working up the load but I want to meter the production runs.

My Hornady measure doesn't work well at all with the 4895. Most drops are OK but every 15-20 drops yields one that is 1 1/2 to 2 grains light. I expected my Lee auto-disk to do better, and it does, but I'm still seeing a .6 gr extreme spread.

I don't know if I can do anything to fix this other than spending a lot of time trickling, or finding a similar performing powder that meters better. A powder that does not need hotter or magnum primers (like H335 does) would be preferred since primers are also hard to get and all I have on hand is CCI small rifle.

Any suggestions?
__________________
The most feared gun control law proposal: Require buyers to register all gun purchases with their wives
DarthNul is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 09:43 AM   #2
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
The first question is, does it matter?

Are all dispensed charges in the safe zone?

If so, how does that ammo shoot?
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives...
...they just don't plan not to.
-Andy Stanley
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 09:53 AM   #3
DarthNul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 288
THe metered loads shoot well about half of the time. If I shoot ten groups of three shots each, half the groups are great: .2" to .6". The other half of the groups suck. All groups shot at 100 yards, AR-15, 18" heavy barrel with 1 in 8 twist.
__________________
The most feared gun control law proposal: Require buyers to register all gun purchases with their wives
DarthNul is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 09:53 AM   #4
Jimro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
Well, off the top of my head I think CFE223 or AR-Comp are the best contenders.

Also in the running Win748, BLC-2, PowerPro-2000 MR or Power Pro Varmint.

All will meter better than IMR4895, although no guarantees on group size.

Jimro
__________________
Machine guns are awesome until you have to carry one.
Jimro is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 09:56 AM   #5
hooligan1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2010
Location: Independence Missouri
Posts: 4,585
Well Brian some of us handloaders count on hitting our weights "dead nuts", although there are experienced competition shooters that swear <1> grain is no problem...

DarthNul, can you dispense while lighly tapping dispenser with a small diameter dowel like just bigger than a bottlerocket stick, it may help the kernels from bulking up like they do sometimes in my RCBS Uniflow.. Remember ever so lighlt tapping, it may quale the necessity of trickling, maybe not...
__________________
Keep your Axe sharp and your powder dry.
hooligan1 is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 10:30 AM   #6
Boomer58cal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2013
Location: closer than you think
Posts: 967
Try one of these...http://www.midwayusa.com/product/699...-powder-baffle

I made one at home with some tin snips. It helps a lot but I still trickle every load. I've loaded several thousand rounds of
223 with 53g V-max for my Bro's Bushmaster AR-15. 26.0g's of IMR-4895 shoots 1/2 moa in his box stock Bushmaster. I trickled every load within the tenth of a grain. The baffle got me within a half a grain. Half a grain is good enough for government work but I'm too OCD for that.

Boomer
__________________
The number one cause of death in the 20th century. 290,000,000 citizens were first disarmed and then murdered by their own governments. This number does not include those killed in war.
We're from the government, we're here to help
Boomer58cal is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 10:46 AM   #7
jwrowland77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 23, 2012
Location: Conway, Arkansas
Posts: 1,398
Try Win 748 or Power Pro 2000-MR. Both meter well and pour like water.
jwrowland77 is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 11:11 AM   #8
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan1 View Post
Well Brian some of us handloaders count on hitting our weights "dead nuts", although there are experienced competition shooters that swear grain is no problem...

DarthNul, can you dispense while lighly tapping dispenser with a small diameter dowel like just bigger than a bottlerocket stick, it may help the kernels from bulking up like they do sometimes in my RCBS Uniflow.. Remember ever so lighlt tapping, it may quale the necessity of trickling, maybe not...
Yes, we do and I am one but I also know it's not necessary. Is an extreme spread of 0.6 too much?

I don't know until it gets shot.

5 rounds at -0.3, 5 rounds at 0, 5 rounds at +0.3

Have someone else put the groups in unknown order.

Put up 3 targets. Shoot them "round robin" style.

Then if you really want to know, do it again, except mix all the loaded cartridges together and take out a random 5 for each group.

Technically, 5 is too small a number but few of us are going to waste 180 bullets to get a "real" answer.

Even that test really only answers the question at that charge range. A 0.6gr spread at a grain higher charge might be completely different.

Switching powders may be effective but there's no guarantee that a different powder will shoot better just because it meters better.

Shooting those bullets might be a "waste". Switching powders might be a "waste".
Roll your dice and take yer chances.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 11:19 AM   #9
RC20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
The answer is to get an electronic powder measure dispenser!

Don;'t over-think this, powder is scarce and its your chance to buy a great tool

My take is the RCBS is tops and Hornady is next (or versa visa).

I like the precision of the powder charges being very close so will get the RCBS or Hornady if it gets rated equal (whatever is less expensive).

But that said, W748 meters well. Still there are always the stick powders that are annoying and still shoot good or are the right one for the gun and the electronic powder dispensers really are a great way to go (and remove all that fiddly stuff with trying to find out if it makes any difference or not as you need to do it with each load, eliminates it as a factor (I.e. it has no negative and can be a positive but removes all doubt its an issue!)
RC20 is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 11:43 AM   #10
DarthNul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 288
Boomer58Cal: My Hornady powder measure came with the baffle so that's already done.

I don't think I'm going to get the Hornady measure to do any better. It's not so much a problem of variations from drop to drop with that measure, it's more a matter of one out every dozen or so drops being too light to even be in the ballpark.

If I can get the Autodisk measure to do just a little better, I'll go with that. If not, I'll have to trickle the remainder of my IMR4895 and hope something that meters well becomes obtainable before spring.
__________________
The most feared gun control law proposal: Require buyers to register all gun purchases with their wives
DarthNul is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 02:46 PM   #11
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Most of the Reloader powders have a very short, fat granule. They meter better than the 4895 'logs'.
And, most (all?) of the Ramshot powders are spherical powders. They meter very nicely.

A few recent threads have expressed difficulty in locating Ramshot TAC. So, it may be getting more popular. But... TAC or X-Terminator would be the first things I tried to locate, if I was in your position.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 03:16 PM   #12
NWPilgrim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
My best loads for 62 gr FMJ and 62 gr TSX are with BL-C2 and H335. Great powders--if you cna find them. If not then trying a differnt measuring method may be best, either the electronic or Auto-Disk (works fine with Varget and H4895).
__________________
"The ultimate authority ... resides in the people alone. ... The advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition."
- James Madison
NWPilgrim is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 04:47 PM   #13
sourdough44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 621
With those 62 grn bullets I'd go right to TAC. Meters great and all the rest is good too.
sourdough44 is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 04:55 PM   #14
cryogenic419
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 569
You running a LNL AP with the LNL measure by chance? Kind of in the same predicament, Varget meters like crap in that thing for .223. I've been looking at Tac, a lot of people seem to be swearing by it.

Or you can go the route I went for all my highpower loads...RCBS Chargemaster combo. Yeah its pricey but man has it helped with dishing out consistant powder drops.
cryogenic419 is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 04:57 PM   #15
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,286
I load Re-15 behind 77 gr bullets.My brother uses Benchmark behind 60 gr Nos Varmint Ballistic tips.

My Hornady measure works well for me.

All I do is bring the handle to a definite bump at the end of travel,both direstions.,and I pause a second at each stop.Thunk,pause,thunk,pause.
HiBC is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 05:40 PM   #16
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,388
IMR powders are exceptionally forgiving to variations in weight as long as loading density is uniform.

Test it and make sure you need to replace it.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 07:11 PM   #17
jcinnb
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2013
Posts: 7
I find reloading a great sport in itself. When I find powders metering poorly, I set the measure low, weigh the charge and then trickle up to the exact amount.

I am obviously a simpleton but I get a kick out of moving that balance needle up to zero.

I understand this is not for the guy in a hurry.

Good luck.
jcinnb is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 07:30 PM   #18
Boomer58cal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2013
Location: closer than you think
Posts: 967
4895... 72 years and still kicking
__________________
The number one cause of death in the 20th century. 290,000,000 citizens were first disarmed and then murdered by their own governments. This number does not include those killed in war.
We're from the government, we're here to help
Boomer58cal is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 07:47 PM   #19
iraiam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
I use several powders that don't meter well in any powder measure, in these cases I weigh each charge and dump it down the funnel where the powder measure should be.

I haven't quite built up enough justification for a chargemaster yet
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason
iraiam is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 08:41 PM   #20
Jeff2131
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2012
Location: Spring City, PA
Posts: 497
Im a nut for imr4320! I havent shot and checked groups on paper(not really interested) but i can tell you that it meters VERY well, is a medium burn rate, and im consistantly nailing a three inch steel target at 100yards, 28 out of 30 times. I shoot a standard AR using a 55gr hp flat base. I forget what the charge is off the top of my head but i keep it 1gr under published max. I also use this powder for my .308's and does an equally impressive job nailing a 3" steel target at 150 yards, scoped. Oh, and the 100 yard AR shot is without a scope, just a cheap $60 reddot. Give this powder a chance as it is a great powder that can be used with alot of different calibers.
Jeff2131 is offline  
Old September 27, 2013, 09:22 PM   #21
Hunter Customs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 26, 2005
Location: Osborn, Missouri
Posts: 2,697
Quote:
Im a nut for imr4320!
Jeff2131, IMR 4320 is my favorite 223 powder in my bolt guns.
I was really shocked today when chronographing some 250 Savage loads I loaded for my Savage 99.

For the heck of it I checked one of my 223 bolt guns that has a heavy 20 inch barrel, the load I shoot in this rifle is 27.2 grs of IMR4320 under a Sierra 55 gr HPBT game king bullet, these loads went thru the Chrono a little over 3300FPS.

I've killed a lot of coyotes with this rifle and load, many of them out to 300 yards.

Best Regards
Bob Hunter
www.huntercustoms.com
Hunter Customs is offline  
Old September 28, 2013, 03:57 PM   #22
Ole 5 hole group
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2002
Location: Red River Valley of the North
Posts: 203
I've shot a lot of 335 with Fed 205 primers and never had any type of problem. Don't know the twist on your rifle but I like VV N135 for the 77 grain bullets - seems like 20.5 grains is the ticket for my AR and it meters very well in the LnL.
Ole 5 hole group is offline  
Old September 28, 2013, 06:13 PM   #23
DarthNul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 288
Quote:
You running a LNL AP with the LNL measure by chance? Kind of in the same predicament, Varget meters like crap in that thing for .223.
The LNL measure is "stand-alone". I have an auto-disk on top of a modified Lee Pro 1000.

I did all the tests on a single stage LNL press and trickled them all. I want to use the progressive for production runs.

I'm going to start from scratch tonight and just run 100 or so cases through the Pro 1000 without seating any bullets. Then I'll measure all the charges. I might have had an issue where the auto-disk didn't quite slide the disks all the way forward. I don't know if the extra fraction of an inch mattered but I'll find out.

I also got an RCBS collet type bullet puller. I plan to pull 10 from each box of 100 that are already loaded and check for consistency.

I have 2 pounds of AA 2230 and a bit of TAC on hand. I'll run some tests with those too. I'm hoping the 2230 works good because it may be a very long time before I can get any TAC: My local reloading store guy says he doesn't expect to see any more TAC in "this lifetime or the next".
__________________
The most feared gun control law proposal: Require buyers to register all gun purchases with their wives
DarthNul is offline  
Old October 1, 2013, 05:45 PM   #24
oneoldsap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: I live in the foot of the Green Mountains of Vermont
Posts: 1,602
W-748 or BL-C2
__________________
Don't forget to have your liberals spayed or neutered !
oneoldsap is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07048 seconds with 10 queries