March 18, 2000, 08:43 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 1999
Location: Zavalla, Texas USA
Posts: 430
|
My father has one of these and I'd appreciate help in tracking down the approximate year of production. The serial number is 150XXX.
------------------ Jim Fox |
March 20, 2000, 11:52 AM | #2 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Hi, Jim,
Could you provide a little more info, like all the markings, patent dates, and whether it is a swing-out cylinder or a solid frame. Jim |
March 20, 2000, 10:40 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 1999
Location: Zavalla, Texas USA
Posts: 430
|
Jim:
As best I can with my bi-focals: Patent date 9/19/1871 Patent 9/5/1874 Patent 1/19/1875 Solid frame - it is the "lightning" (or "Thunderer" in the .41 Colt), not the DA Army of similar configuration but larger size. As best I can figure from various sources the production date was 1876/77 through 1909/10. I'd appreciate any approximation on Mfg. Date, or a direction to a good source for the mfg. date. Thanks for any guidance. ------------------ Jim Fox |
March 21, 2000, 12:35 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 644
|
From the serial number, your father's revolver was made in 1904.
|
March 21, 2000, 09:23 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 1999
Location: Zavalla, Texas USA
Posts: 430
|
Daniel:
Thanks. I really appreciate the help. ------------------ Jim Fox [This message has been edited by JimFox (edited March 21, 2000).] |
March 21, 2000, 02:22 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 1999
Location: California
Posts: 2,716
|
I can tell you one thing. The .41 is really inaccurate with .38 specials.
My cousin and I as dumb teenagers found a .41 in the attic at the ranch and bought some .38's for our new gun. Couldn't hit a thing. The oversize chambers were probably the best thing for us to let the pressure out. Ten foot groups were standard. |
|
|