The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 14, 2007, 04:46 PM   #1
Ammo Junky
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 537
Compressed loads?

I genraly try to avoid compressed loads. However heavier bullets need slower powders and that where the trouble starts. 165 3006 load with 57.5 h4350 is great, but when I switch to 180gr and 56.0 H4350 I get compression. I have a similar situation whith 175gr bullets and varget in 308. I guess switching to the next faster powder would relive the compression, but I cant see using a faster powder with a heavier bullet and slower with the lighter bullet. What is the concensis?
__________________
Will work for brass.

I apologise in advance for spelling errors.
Ammo Junky is offline  
Old June 14, 2007, 04:48 PM   #2
cheygriz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 11, 2002
Location: high up in the rockies
Posts: 2,289
Most of my very accurate loads are compressed. There's no reason to avoid compressed charges.
__________________
If you think a mighty military force is expensive, wait 'til you see what a weak one costs.
cheygriz is offline  
Old June 14, 2007, 05:20 PM   #3
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
I use compressed loads all the time. Nothing wrong with them. Sometimes you need to use a magnum primer to get the party started. Most load data will tell you when to use a magnum primer.

I use cheap surplus H870 powder in my 6.5x55 to great effect and I am developing plinking loads for the 7.5x55. Both use compressed powder charges.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old June 15, 2007, 12:59 PM   #4
ligonierbill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,461
Crosshair, what are you loading in your 6.5x55? I've got H870 that I use for heavy bullets in 7 mm Mag, but I have only used IMR 4350 in the 6.5. I was about to load some 140 gr with Reloader 22.
ligonierbill is online now  
Old June 15, 2007, 02:00 PM   #5
Shoney
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2002
Location: Transplanted from Montana
Posts: 2,311
I’ve used compressed loads in many rifle cartridges with great success.

I have a friend who loads 338 Wim Mag by filling the case to overflowing with IMR XXYZ, then leveling it off with a knife, then crunching a bullet home. His accuracy is very good. One summer he decided to hunt the wild and elusive prurient prevaricating pusillanimous prairie poodle with the 338 (Some professional guides consider this cartridge to be the minimum necessary to stop the charge of an enraged bull prairie poodle.).

It was 90-100+ degree weather, and after a series of thundershowers, it became very humid and muggy. He discovered that the cartridges in the magazine were wedged in and the others would not chamber. Hot humid weather can swell powder, and on compressed loads it may push the bullet forward. Many hunters going to Africa with Big Five legal weapons have experienced this. So BEWARE when using compressed loads in hot humid conditions.
__________________
I pledge allegiance to the Flag - - -, and to the Republic for which it stands….Our Forefathers were brilliant for giving us a Republic, not a democracy! Do you know the difference??? and WHY?http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissue...les.asp?id=111
Shoney is offline  
Old June 15, 2007, 06:25 PM   #6
Ammo Junky
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 537
I have have seen compressed loads give much less consistant loaded oal. This is during pressuar workups where loads start out not compressed and go up. The oal was measured with a coparator, before anyone asks.
__________________
Will work for brass.

I apologise in advance for spelling errors.
Ammo Junky is offline  
Old June 15, 2007, 09:19 PM   #7
crowbeaner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,943
The only compressed loads that I use are in the 22-250 and 243. The powder in the 22-250 is Imr 4350 and in the 243 it is Imr 7828. Neither is "compressed" all that much, and I prefer to have some airspace in the case to allow for temperature variation. If you use IMR 4064 in your 30-06 with the 180 grainer, you'll have just about the same velocity:2700 fps. Loads with 4350 might do a little better, but not much.
crowbeaner is offline  
Old June 16, 2007, 06:54 PM   #8
amamnn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 13, 2006
Location: WA, the left armpit of the USA
Posts: 1,323
If you use a drop tube, a lot of compressed loads are no longer really compressed. In BR competition it can make a difference to lay the powder with a drop tube so that you avoid broken grains and oddities in the powder column durring ignition. For most other uses I don't see a need for a compressed load; the slight velocity gain is far outweighed by the accelerated barrel errosion in factory rifles. Trajectories don't change all that much with a slight boost either. An elk won't know the difference between a 2950 fps bullet and a 2750 bullet.
__________________
"If the enemy is in range, so are you." - Infantry Journal
amamnn is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06679 seconds with 10 queries