The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 2, 2012, 06:18 PM   #1
3kgt2nv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: hudson valley NY
Posts: 517
reloading for the .32 s&w long wc only

I picked up a hammerli p240 in .32 s&w long in wc only configuration. Finding reloading data for this was a chore so i decided to start from scratch and develop my on load. I started at 2.0 gr bullseye using a 83gr berry plated hbwc.

results are looking good so far. dead on point of impact. no excessive case bulge like with the factory federal stuff and very mild recoil.

Any one else reload this excat cartridge and if so what powder and charge do you use since im just guessing at this particular load?

thanks
Matt
3kgt2nv is offline  
Old December 3, 2012, 07:49 AM   #2
FlyFish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Overlooking the Baker River Valley
Posts: 1,723
I and most of the guys on my pistol team get outstanding accuracy in our Walther GSPs using 1.8 gr of W231 under a 98 gr DEWC. Most of us use bullets from Magnus, their product No. 204. Those with deeper pockets shoot the considerably more expensive Lapua HBWCs, but I don't think it makes a great deal of difference.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member
NRA Certified Instructor: Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun, PPIH, Metallic & Shotgun Shell Reloading; RSO
Pemigewasset Valley Fish & Game Club

Last edited by FlyFish; December 3, 2012 at 08:34 AM.
FlyFish is offline  
Old December 3, 2012, 11:30 AM   #3
3kgt2nv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: hudson valley NY
Posts: 517
With these taking such a light powder charge how the the weight deviation on the magnus bullets? I sorted the box of 250the berry bullets by weight to keep them more consistent
3kgt2nv is offline  
Old December 3, 2012, 11:41 AM   #4
FlyFish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Overlooking the Baker River Valley
Posts: 1,723
I've never bothered to do that, nor do I know of anyone else who has. With the 50 ft. distances we're shooting at, I don't think there's any practical difference in point of impact due to weight differences in bullets. Or, if there is some theoretical improvement possible by sorting bullets according to weight, it's going to be too small for my humble skills to take advantage of. From a rest, at 50 ft. my GSP shoots my handloads into one not-very-ragged hole - offhand, not so much.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member
NRA Certified Instructor: Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun, PPIH, Metallic & Shotgun Shell Reloading; RSO
Pemigewasset Valley Fish & Game Club
FlyFish is offline  
Old February 19, 2013, 03:02 AM   #5
ALBEITAR
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 5, 2012
Posts: 1
By the way, wich diameter do you use for theis pistol (Hämmerli P240), .311. .312, .313?
I have just bought a 500 box of H&N .312 HBWC to test in my pistol, I wil try them with Vectan BA10 (1.1-1.3 grains).

Regards
ALBEITAR is offline  
Old February 19, 2013, 11:55 AM   #6
WIL TERRY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2000
Location: BLACK HILLS
Posts: 1,322
I have loaded many tens if thousands of 32S&WLONG WC ammunition. ALL of my 32LONG and 32 MAG guns prefer 98 to 100GR WC bullets flying right at 890to 900fps. AT last count I think I've tested at least ten propellents in those loads. I was sitting here thinking about how fine damn near all of the test loads shot and remembered the first six rounds of 32LONG 100gr Wc test loads from a RUGER 6 1/2" SSM 32MAG put all six bullets in .40" at 25 yards off the sandbag rests. I was impressed !!! NO !!! I will not tell you the data as you are using a non-locked blowback pistol; BIG difference.

Last edited by WIL TERRY; February 20, 2013 at 11:54 AM.
WIL TERRY is offline  
Old February 19, 2013, 08:01 PM   #7
SHR970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 1,427
Will you tell me? I've been meaning to get around to doing a WC load for my 1984 three digit S/N Single Six. You will probably save me some frustration...like what I am going through for a great 115 gr. cast load.
SHR970 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06079 seconds with 10 queries