April 18, 2008, 03:33 PM | #76 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
By the way, I HIGHLY recommend Cooper's books if you are at all intereste in guns, hunting, or politics.....
|
April 18, 2008, 03:33 PM | #77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 14, 2001
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 2,106
|
Thankyou!!
Jim Bob 86--Thx for explaining. The Germans do come up with some truly delightful words!
__________________
God Bless America --Smokey Joe |
April 18, 2008, 03:35 PM | #78 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Usually by smashing two (or More!) words together...... I like that about that language. The grammar, on the other hand, ........ not so much.
|
April 18, 2008, 05:29 PM | #79 | |
Junior member
Join Date: September 7, 2007
Posts: 921
|
jimbob86
Quote:
Or we could go with #5 The longest kill I ever got on any deer was more than 700 yards away with a 12 gauge shotgun............... IMPOSSIBLE. Maybe someone who is good with a 12 gauge could do it, but not me with the opensights and Foster pill I was armed with. I chose option 5, what is option 5. Option 5 is to getup and hunt. I put my 155 pound butt into gear and closed in on him by more than 600 yards and made a killing shot at 88 yards. Pressing the trigger is but .02% of hunting for me. I hunt first, then I kill the animal. Give me a gun and I will find a way to make it work, not complain I cann't kill with it at 200 yards............ |
|
April 23, 2008, 08:17 AM | #80 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Manatee County, Florida
Posts: 1,974
|
This is my daughter. She toppled this mule deer with one shot the neck at about 80 yards or so. This was during the early Youth Season. She hunted from ground blind with my super accurate prairie dog rifle - Savage 112-V in 223 with Winchester 64 grain ammo. When you shoot dogtowns all summer like we do, precision shots are not difficult at all. She currently hunts with 30-30 or .243 rifle. Hunting buck during regular season is not the same as early Youth Season. The bucks tend to be a little more spooky and less inclined to stand and stare. In summary, .223 is fine for IDEAL shooting conditions. But when distance is far or shot must be made from offhand, the heavy barreled .223 is a poor choice indeed. Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release. |
April 23, 2008, 09:37 AM | #81 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 24, 2006
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 705
|
I have hunted mule deer for many years. I have used many different calibers, 22LR, 30-30, 30-06, 44Spl, 270, and 222 Rem.
I have killed deer with all of these and probably more with the 222 than any other cartridge. I do insist on a shot to the brain with the little 222. If you can do that the 223 or any of the centerfire 22 rounds will dispatch a deer reliably. On body shots, it is not enough for deer I am sorry, it is just a poor choice of deer rifle. You will end up with too many wounded deer. Get a 30-06 or 270 for a deer rifle. My favorite is the 270. |
April 23, 2008, 10:16 AM | #82 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 17, 2008
Location: Piedmont,NC
Posts: 464
|
223 enough for deer?
It was the last time I shot one. Right bullet, Right shot placement ,reasonable range, thats all it takes. Works every time.
|
April 23, 2008, 04:57 PM | #83 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
We all hunt differently.
Quote:
You hunt your way, and I'll hunt mine. Your way is probably better suited to your area. You try still-hunting where I hunt, and you'll be just that: still hunting on the last day of the season, while everyone else has filled their tags, checked their deer in, and started the cutting and wrapping..... |
|
April 24, 2008, 10:10 AM | #84 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Manatee County, Florida
Posts: 1,974
|
This is my daughter again but different year. It was a spot & stalk hunt in rough country. This heavy bodied muley fell to a 30-30 bullet shot through the chest organs. It would have been very difficult to haul my heavy barreled .223 around these steep canyons. We are acquainted with a Mexican shepard who has but one rifle. Its a WW2 German mauser in 8mm. American made ammo is loaded down to 30-30 velocity but that has never been a handicap to this careful hunter. He has taken many elk with this old rifle. Shot placement is a factor which is often ignored by the shooting press. The 64 grain Winchester bullet and 60 grain nosler Partition are genuine big game bullets. My friend loads the Nosler in his 220 Swift. I've witnessed instant death performed with broadside chest shots. Even big mulies are not armor plated. Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release. |
May 5, 2008, 03:08 AM | #85 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Mississippi/Texas
Posts: 2,505
|
It will do work just fine if you do yor part as in a perfect shot. I would use some Barnes x bullets.
Last edited by publius; May 5, 2008 at 03:05 PM. |
May 5, 2008, 07:04 AM | #86 | |
Member
Join Date: August 20, 2007
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
|
|
May 5, 2008, 07:32 AM | #87 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2007
Location: N.J.
Posts: 1,111
|
Theres alot of contraversy on the ft.lbs. of energy to kill a deer and after much research I have seen that it takes at least 1000 ft lbs of energy in a rifle cartridge to get a good clean kill on a whitetail up to 150 lbs and im sure theres alot dead from lesser but 1000ft.lbs. is the goal. A .223 with the right loads will kill a deer dead with some energy to spare. Im not saying I would use one with the better options out there but if thats all I had I would get some good ammo practice alot and limit my shots to 100yds max and standing broadside only. And remember that alot of states limit the size caliber you can use so check your local laws first.
__________________
Mike B. Gun control= Being able to hit your target. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pifinnercircle |
May 5, 2008, 07:36 AM | #88 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 18, 2007
Posts: 14
|
If a .223 can kill a SAND FLEE it should work great on a Deer.
|
May 5, 2008, 07:49 AM | #89 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
Hogs are much harder to kill than deer. Have killed a lot of hogs with the .223and M193 military ball ammo: If hit right, they usually drop in their tracks.
|
May 5, 2008, 11:10 AM | #90 | |
Member
Join Date: August 20, 2007
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
|
|
May 5, 2008, 03:06 PM | #91 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Mississippi/Texas
Posts: 2,505
|
It will do work just fine if you do yor part as in a perfect shot. i would some Barnes x bullets.
|
May 5, 2008, 05:04 PM | #92 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
retrieverman, any bullet's effectiveness is controlled in part by thickness of hide and size/density of bone. Hogs, generally, are more heavily built than deer. Penetration can easily be more difficult. What might be a kill-shot on a deer could be a bad-wound shot on a hog.
|
May 5, 2008, 08:37 PM | #93 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2007
Location: N.J.
Posts: 1,111
|
What bullet and grain would one recommend for deer in a .223 cal.? I was thinking along the lines of a Hornady Interlock 60grain soft point or Hornady 75 grain TAP ammo. And another good one is the Barnes 70 grain TSX tripple shock. Im thinking the best would be the Barnes bacause they have reliable expansion and stay together even when hitting bone.
__________________
Mike B. Gun control= Being able to hit your target. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pifinnercircle |
May 5, 2008, 08:48 PM | #94 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 17, 2008
Location: Piedmont,NC
Posts: 464
|
Heavy bullets
The heavier bullets will not shoot very accurate in most 223 cal. rifles. You may shoot the 60gr. with some satisfaction but anything larger will probably require A different barrel twist. Most heavier bullets will require A 1 in 9 twist and the lighter bullets will require A 1 in 12 twist which is most common in todays 223 cal. rifles.
|
May 5, 2008, 09:58 PM | #95 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 885
|
Obviously this thread garners a lot of interest. One general suggestion to whoever might care. If you have plans to hunt outside of your home turf like say,,,Wyoming. Consider what any other states have as a minimum caliber to use. In Texas, Utah, anything that is not a rimfire is pretty much okay. Wyo has a minimum cal of .243..
Some people are early enough in their gun habit to only afford one or two rifles..Pick a caliber that will match wherever you might hunt. elkman06
__________________
"The right of the citizens to bear arms in the defense of themselves and of the state shall not be denied." Wyoming Constitution Article 1, Sec24 "Better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6" |
May 5, 2008, 10:48 PM | #96 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,482
|
The old timers in Nebraska always talk about the giant beaver. It happened in 1902. A farmer shot a 172 pound, six foot long beaver right through the eye, bang-flop. Front teeth were 4" long fangs. The farmer used his rifle loaded with .22 short.
So now you at least know that a .22 short through the eyeball will kill a giant beaver. And it should work just fine for a.....[fill in the blank]. |
May 7, 2008, 03:40 PM | #97 |
Member
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Posts: 82
|
if you shoot them in the neck or head it will work like a charm
|
May 16, 2008, 04:48 PM | #98 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Posts: 215
|
A .17 Rem. with proper shot placement will cleanly kill a Grizzly Bear.
A .22 Hornet has been known as a 'poacher's round' because it is relatively quiet - and with proper shot placement...will cleanly kill a deer. If native americans had .17 Rems. and .22 Hornets 500 yrs. ago , they would have been used successfully as 'Big Game Weapons.' However, there are cartridges that are far more practical and just better... for hunting deer sized game. The problem with the .223 is that it's a small bullet that can be easily deflected by bone...and when the .223 hits bone, it's likely to splinter the bone rather than break through it. A bigger bullet is more likely to shatter the bone and create a more immediatly disabling wound and blood trail. A broadside shot at 75yds. with a .223 ought not be too problematic...but a less than perfect angle at 200yds.where a lot of penetration is needed - might be a big problem that results in a wounded deer that runs away... A .243 outclasses a .223 and is just about as pleasant to shoot... |
May 16, 2008, 11:48 PM | #99 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
|
223 can and is used with good results by kids in texas all the time. Usually at closer than 100 yards, and no brush.
My 10 year old female cousin shot her first whitetail at 75 yards right in the earhole LOL....It was DRT But i will have to agree the 243 is a better choice.. I used one regularly out to 250 yds where my feeder was until I was about 30 years old before I decided I needed something "mas bruto" and more macho...
__________________
Be insensitive....tell the truth |
May 17, 2008, 12:59 AM | #100 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: Florida, east coast
Posts: 2,106
|
In FL a 223 is adequate at short range and with a clear shooting corridor. We learned a long time ago that a blade of sawgrass will deflect the light bullets.
It's not my choice for general hunting here. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|