|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 23, 2021, 09:51 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 558
|
Most consistent POI - clamped down or resting free?
I’ve seen guys at the range with their rifles clamped tight to their sled and think that can’t be good. I like to have the least amount of “grip” from the front rest and rear bunny bag.
I’m most concerned about the front and rear swivel studs catching and throwing off the shot. I would think the two different styles would have different POI but which setup would have the most “consistent” POI? Thanks.
__________________
What direction did that last shot at Kennedy come from? |
August 23, 2021, 10:04 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,868
|
I always shoot free resting. If you shoot clamped down, how do you do that in the field? Seems to me maybe the best way in in a rest that holds the butt tight and allows the rifle to free recoil. But then all you'd be testing is the rifle and not yourself.
|
August 23, 2021, 10:21 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,158
|
It all depends. Clamping rifles into rests is against most benchrest class rules for a reason. If it were not accurate, there would not be rules about it. Linear bearing and pneumatic shocks are the way to go, but then there are those rules again.
|
August 23, 2021, 12:34 PM | #4 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,617
|
Mechanically speaking, the most consistent system is one where the gun cannot move and the entire mechanism vibrates the same way every shot.
Anything that allows any movement can introduce variables which can result in shot to shot differences. Quote:
Clamping the rifle isn't allowed in shooting matches simply because it removes the human element, and the human element is a large part of what the game is about. Its not about who can build the best shooting machine, its about how well the shooter can do with the best rifles he can shoot. Like auto racing, its not just about who has the best car, its also about who is the best driver.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
August 23, 2021, 05:56 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,158
|
Quote:
|
|
August 23, 2021, 09:25 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Last edited by Bart B.; August 23, 2021 at 09:30 PM. |
August 24, 2021, 06:36 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 2,154
|
__________________
Semper Fi Vietnam 1965 VFW Life member NRA Life Member |
August 24, 2021, 12:45 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Quote:
|
|
August 24, 2021, 03:13 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,627
|
Even I could probably set a world record group with a laser beam.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
August 24, 2021, 03:43 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
In contrast to how tiny a single 5-shot group can be, check out the IBS and NBRSA aggregate records for several 10-shot groups. You'll see the average of several groups but remember that the largest group is much bigger than the average.
People have built mechanical rests that hold rifles much like we do. They let the rifle recoil normally then are pushed back to the firing position. Military teams used them to test 30 caliber semiautomatic match grade rifles and ammo. I've seen 7.62 Garand 600 yard 20-shot test groups of 4 inches with handloads. Last edited by Bart B.; August 24, 2021 at 10:04 PM. |
August 24, 2021, 09:55 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,158
|
Quote:
|
|
August 26, 2021, 01:09 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2006
Location: Homes in Brooklyn, NY and in Pennsylvania.
Posts: 5,472
|
Bench?
Quote:
__________________
“Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports ... all others are games.” Ernest Hemingway ... NRA Life Member |
|
August 27, 2021, 10:36 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
|
August 28, 2021, 08:32 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2006
Location: Homes in Brooklyn, NY and in Pennsylvania.
Posts: 5,472
|
Field results
Yep. Despite that, i rarely see anyone at the range assume a field position. It is always the bench.
__________________
“Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports ... all others are games.” Ernest Hemingway ... NRA Life Member |
August 29, 2021, 09:34 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 525
|
FWIW, my Marlin lever guns prefer to have my hand around the forearm when I'm using a rest. The other rifles, not so much.
__________________
"Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most." A. Brilliant |
August 31, 2021, 05:52 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,158
|
|
August 31, 2021, 06:56 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 912
|
If you are asking if the rifle action will shoot more accurately in a clamped fixture than in an unclamped rest I suggest you look to ways the high end rifles that send test targets to show accuracy shoot their test targets.
My Les Baer Super Varmint .223 is guaranteed to shoot 5-round groups under 0.5 inches at 100 yards with factory ammo. It came with a test target with two 5-round groups shot with 77 grain Federal GMM SMKs shot from a 'fixture'. The two groups measured 0.105 and 0.121 inches. Shooting from a Sinclair F-class bipod and a Protektor rear bag, I managed to shoot hand loads that averaged as small as .202. The top 10 loads averaged 0.253 and the top 25 loads averaged 0.275. I never got factory ammo to shoot a group better than 0.308. My buddy bought a .308 Les Baer Monolith and it came with a test target with two groups both just under 0.1 inches. He also never got close to that with his best hand loads. You can see why they use a clamped fixture to eliminate 'shooter induced variations'. As for front and rear studs effecting the accuracy, I find that the rear sling stud will cause problems if it bounces on the rear bag, so I remove them when shooting from a bench. I use the front sling stud to attach my F-Class bipod so it adds stability instead of causing inaccuracy. If I used a front rest that the stud might recoil against, I would remove the front stud too. |
September 1, 2021, 01:36 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
Quote:
My goal when I was hunting was to get 2 to 4 inches (depended on what caliber) above center with 3 shots rested. Of all my game takes, none was ever free standing. Sometimes a tree, sometimes a kneel, once over the hood of a pickup (yes I was a bad boy and shot on from the road) Huge difference between standing on a firing line all relaxed and working your way through the woods on a stalk. My brother once shot a moose from up in a tree (yes that is extreme but it was situation specific) So off the bench tells you the gun is sighted in, what group size you will get at best and who knows what position you will actually be in shooting game? So nothing wrong with that. Nothing wrong with it. The hoot is now I am doing nothing but target shooting, I have hunters look at my groups and drool. Hey guy, this is a game, its not what you are doing (you can always tell the hunters). Do you get your Moose or Caribou each year (usually yes). Good deal, hunting is not bench rest shooting. Too many other factors go into a successful hunt and Dale Tubbs class shooting is the bottom of the list. Its your stalk, knowing the area, knowing the animals, stalking in the woods as needed, having a decent camping setup if you are out extended that leaves you dry, decently fed and watered. The only free standing shot I made was technically a hit. Unfortunately the hit split the hide above the backbone and did nothing other than to confirm I had left and right nailed. I missed because I held higher than I had sighted the gun in for when I should have put the aim high on the animal and not above it. Dumb me (yes in the end with a lucky shot from my brother and a long chase through the woods we got it - it turned into a saga and a great story)
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
|
September 4, 2021, 08:33 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2021
Location: SW Okla
Posts: 201
|
Depends on why I am at the range.
As stated above, clamped down proves accuracy of rifle and ammo. When sighting in a scope, I want to rifle secure, to ensure scope and bore are aligned. When working up a load, clamped or a solid rest. When preparing myself for hunting season, scope is sighted, ammo is ready, I shoot mostly from standing position. Practice allows / prepares me to maintain minute-of-deer groups, shooting at steel gongs, not paper. I care little about the group, just hits. When in the field, a tree or any type of rest ensures a better shot, but confidence in making the shot free standing is important to me. I agree, though, I see very few (zero) shooting off hand or standing, at the range. |
September 4, 2021, 02:09 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
I've never seen a rifle whose bore axis points directly above the LOS to a point on target equal to bullet drop plus sight height above the bore.
That doesn't happen until the bullet leaves the barrel. |
September 4, 2021, 04:26 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,993
|
It’s been years since I shot a deer or pig offhand, though squirrels, armadillos, and skunks are dispatched (or missed) offhand. I sight in rifles, work up accuracy loads, and shoot paper for fun off a bench and sandbags. Once I have the level of accuracy I want, I’m good. My confidence level in shooting offhand is pretty high, but it will never be as good as shooting braced on a tree, post, or whatever. If the offhand shot opportunity is out past 100 yards or so, I’ll usually pass. I don’t need the meat that bad.
All that said, I have a Tikka T1X in 22lr. Great trigger and scope, and I can really shoot that jewel offhand. I could never shoot my 9422 or 39A as well. |
September 6, 2021, 05:32 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,158
|
That would all depend on how you shoot in the field. My box blinds have front and rear rests(if needed).
My other stands have shots less than 100. Assuming animal is standing still, if you miss under 100, you might want to devote some serious time to the range. |
September 12, 2021, 02:42 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
It doesn't take many marksmanship skills to shoot precisely from a bench.
|
September 12, 2021, 04:39 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,627
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|