|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 15, 2013, 02:35 PM | #1 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2008
Posts: 550
|
Colt shuts plant, workers talk to Conn. law...
It's not as bad as you think, but it's good that Colt is speaking out. A good article about the 400 workers at Colt in Conn. going to their state legislature explaining what the result of draconian gun laws really is. I wish Remington and other manf. would do the same.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
In my hour of darkness In my time of need Oh Lord grant me vision Oh Lord grant me speed - Gram Parsons |
||
March 15, 2013, 02:37 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 14, 2013
Posts: 138
|
New England has SO MANY gun makers/factories, and so many anti-gun politicians. It drives me nuts, and I need to move north to New Hampshire or Maine where Ruger and Smith and Wesson even have plants.
My grandfather and my father, and 3 friends of mine all work/worked at the S&W plant in Springfield, MA too near where I grew up. The fact that my state is trying to ruin gun ownership makes me so upset.
__________________
Massachusetts Native (Tough to be a gun owner!) Owner of: S&W Model 10-5, Beretta 92fs and a Mossberg Maverick 88 "Security" Shotgun |
March 15, 2013, 08:09 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 17, 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 265
|
Good for Colt, set the example.
If the CT lawmakers do not to listen, TN is very manufacturer friendly!!! Without any state income tax or snow to shovel. |
March 15, 2013, 08:32 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 14, 2013
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
__________________
Massachusetts Native (Tough to be a gun owner!) Owner of: S&W Model 10-5, Beretta 92fs and a Mossberg Maverick 88 "Security" Shotgun |
|
March 15, 2013, 08:36 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: September 15, 2012
Posts: 88
|
Colt shuts plant, workers talk to Conn. law...
|
March 15, 2013, 08:42 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
|
Connecticut is a very liberal state and after Sandy Hook the push for strict gun laws is strong. If Colt doesn't resonate with the anti gunners they should pack up and move. Lots of states that would welcome them and probably give them incentives.
|
March 15, 2013, 08:56 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2005
Location: Ct.
Posts: 546
|
Re: Colt shuts plant, workers talk to Conn. law...
I've been following the proposed bills closely. A few recent articles have pointed out how little AR type rifles are actually used in crimes around here. The momentum is slowing and I think we are going to get out of this with only some increased background check laws getting passed. And hopefully we can keep our remaining gun manufacturers here. A wikipedia search on the history of gun manufacturing in Ct will surprise most people. We were the Armory of America for the first few hundred years. I would venture to say that Ct has produced more firearms than any other state in the nation. I'm proud of my state's history in firearm manufacturing and saddened by what's becoming of it.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histo...ticut_industry Last edited by Niantician; March 15, 2013 at 09:32 PM. |
March 15, 2013, 11:26 PM | #8 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Niantician, I think you're wrong. I hope you're right, but I think you're wrong. I think you're going to see a 10-round magazine limit, I think you're going to see your state AWB expanded to name more guns and to reduce the number of "evil" features from two to one, and I think you're going to see retroactive registration required for "assault weapons" that are currently legally-owned.
I know people in Connecticut who are already boxing up their standard-capacity magazines for shipment to friends in free states for safe-keeping, and shopping for 10-round mags. |
March 16, 2013, 07:29 AM | #9 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: October 13, 2008
Location: Hermit's Peak
Posts: 623
|
Quote:
Quote:
I have been involved in moving a much smaller operation, and that was only a few towns over. It would be a monumental undertaking. There is nothing "just" about it. |
||
March 16, 2013, 09:37 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 136
|
Didn't Winchester move to Turkey to make life easier?
|
March 16, 2013, 06:54 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 15, 2011
Location: N Ireland. UK.
Posts: 1,809
|
Quote:
|
|
March 16, 2013, 07:49 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: The "Gunshine State"
Posts: 1,981
|
Depends on whether they are moving all of their gear or just starting over in a new location. Remember, one reason Colt has had so much trouble over the years is that their equipment is somewhat ancient. Scrapping a lot of it, getting incentives to move, building a new building, and buying new equipment might actually come out cheaper over the long haul
|
March 17, 2013, 03:38 PM | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 14
|
They are opening the new plant right here in the tourist capital of the world, Kissimmee, fl .
|
March 17, 2013, 03:59 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 10, 2010
Posts: 720
|
tiereta,
I have been hearing about the FL Colt plant, but there doesnt seem to be much movement as of yet. I am unsure what will happen with Colts plans on starting something up or moving to FL in the future, or if it would be an issue with a potential move elsewhere. http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/...lt-jobs-impact Quote:
|
|
March 17, 2013, 04:12 PM | #15 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 13, 2008
Location: Hermit's Peak
Posts: 623
|
Quote:
What I'm saying is that it takes a long time to plan and execute. It's not something that "just happens." It also costs a lot. A LOT. Have you been involved in a company relocating, as I have? |
|
March 18, 2013, 08:02 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
|
March 21, 2013, 04:13 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 635
|
Veilleux's op-ed
Dennis Veilleux, Colt CEO wrote to the Hartford Courant about Colt possibly leaving the state:
http://articles.courant.com/2013-03-...s-manufacturer He ends with: Quote:
__________________
SAF, ACLDN, IDPA, handgunlaw.us My AmazonSmile benefits SAF I'd rather be carried by 6 than caged by 12. 2020: It's pronounced twenty twenty. |
|
March 21, 2013, 04:21 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
|
Quote:
|
|
March 21, 2013, 05:55 PM | #19 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 25, 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 736
|
Re: Colt shuts plant, workers talk to Conn. law...
Hope all the gun companies move to free states. You know...those states that respect the rights of their citizens. Not pushing for TX. We have enough people moving here. Why don't they move across the road from Ruger in Arizona? (I think that's where ruger is anyways)
|
March 22, 2013, 07:55 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,287
|
It is worthy of note that approx 8 days before the Sandy Hook shootings,the Gov of CT offered Bushmaster generous incentives,to move to CT.
While moving a mfg plant is a large undertaking,it can also be true the old facility and machinery is an obstacle to efficiency. Taxes,perhaps a fresh wage and benefit structure,and a new plant layout based on modern manufacturing methods might breath new life into Colt made in USA. Many of those old plants were located so that a mill wheel in the river could drive a jackshaft in the ceiling .The plant was laid out to place the machines under the jackshafts. A modern facility can be designed around workflow and processes. |
March 28, 2013, 01:19 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2005
Location: Ct.
Posts: 546
|
Re: Colt shuts plant, workers talk to Conn. law...
Anti-gun momentum is weakening by the day here. Politicians can make threats but that doesnt mean we aren't a "free" state (whatever that means) Ct is still essentially a shall issue, open carry state with no capacity restrictions and AR-15s are still being produced and sold by the thousands every month. Our State constitution still proclaims the "right to bare arms shall no be infringed" and our citizens plan to keep it that way. Yes, we are a socially and economically liberal state but our rich firearms history cannot be ignored, surpassed or taken for granted. You would be better served in the long run trying to help our cause rather than trying to divide us.
|
March 28, 2013, 05:20 AM | #22 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
And your state's constitution does not say that the RKBA "shall not be infringed." It actually says: Quote:
|
||
March 28, 2013, 01:38 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2005
Location: Ct.
Posts: 546
|
Re: Colt shuts plant, workers talk to Conn. law...
Any member of the legislature can propose a bill just like any citizen can file a lawsuit. That doesn't mean it will become law, or even come up for a vote. Two years ago a proposal to limit capacity to ten rounds couldn't even make it to the floor for a vote. Our governor doesn't pass laws by himself. He is noticably frustrated with the lack of action on his proposed bills and with the resistance they are facing by both voters and legislators.
|
March 28, 2013, 02:31 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Niantician --
I think we all here hope you are correct in your assessment. |
March 30, 2013, 02:56 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,378
|
Reps from my gun club have been meeting with legislators, the word we are getting (at last communication) is they are thinking they will make a sacrifice, 10 rd ban in favor of dropping the other restrictions.
|
|
|