The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 17, 2012, 05:05 AM   #1
FlyerXD
Member
 
Join Date: February 10, 2012
Posts: 31
Tactical 870 build questions

I bought an 870 Tactical about 2 1/2 years ago thinking this would be my go to shotgun.Was very happy with this gun at first but not so much now.I love the 870 it fits me perfectly but this weapon has locked up on me a few times and 2 bubble spots have appeared on the ejection side of the reciever.After much research I have decided to send the gun to JD at AIP in Michigan for some TLC that Remington didn't give it and to get it parkerized. I wantto change out the barrel I believe I want a fixed cylinder bore since buckshot and slugs will be the guns diet. Are the police barrels heavier walled? Do the police barrels pattern better? Will a police barrel fit an express reciever ?
__________________
When a 12 gauge speaks people listen

Last edited by FlyerXD; February 17, 2012 at 05:14 AM.
FlyerXD is offline  
Old February 17, 2012, 06:42 AM   #2
Dave McC
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
No.Same dimensions.

Maybe. Each barrel is a law unto itself.

Yes. With the sole exception of Special Field models, all 870 stuff is interchangeable within gauge.
Dave McC is offline  
Old February 17, 2012, 12:28 PM   #3
FlyerXD
Member
 
Join Date: February 10, 2012
Posts: 31
Thanks for the info Dave.
__________________
When a 12 gauge speaks people listen
FlyerXD is offline  
Old February 17, 2012, 12:58 PM   #4
NYCShooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 2, 2009
Posts: 103
Quote:
I wantto change out the barrel I believe I want a fixed cylinder bore since buckshot and slugs will be the guns diet.
Actually slugs generally perform better through a slightly constricted barrel, with I/C being pretty much ideal. JD sells barrels and I'll bet a parkerized I/C factory barrel will be less expensive than a CYL bore.
NYCShooter is offline  
Old February 18, 2012, 07:13 PM   #5
Dave McC
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
You're quite welcome.

Re barrels, most newer short barrels have a little choke in them, oft IC.

This works for slugs and buck better than straight cylinder most of the time....
Dave McC is offline  
Old February 18, 2012, 08:41 PM   #6
FlyerXD
Member
 
Join Date: February 10, 2012
Posts: 31
Thanks when I save up a little more cash and call JD I will mention what the guns gonna eat. I don't like the extended choke that came on it cause it turns my 18 1/2" barrel to around 20".
__________________
When a 12 gauge speaks people listen
FlyerXD is offline  
Old February 18, 2012, 08:59 PM   #7
NYCShooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 2, 2009
Posts: 103
Quote:
Re barrels, most newer short barrels have a little choke in them, oft IC.

This works for slugs and buck better than straight cylinder most of the time....
Except, of course, loads such as Federal FliteControl and Hornady TAP, which seem to pattern better out of CYL bore.
NYCShooter is offline  
Old February 18, 2012, 09:40 PM   #8
TheKlawMan
Junior member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,149
I think JD is a good choice. Long ago I decided that if and when my Express needs it I am sending it to JD for parkerizing. He will build it the way you want it, but I think he also subcribes to simple is best.
TheKlawMan is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03758 seconds with 10 queries