|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 18, 2012, 04:26 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Chambering A Round By Hand, Bad for Extractor?
Recently I have been noticing bullet setback with my Sig 232 and figured chambering the first round by hand with the slide locked back would minimize this. Upon further research I noticed some say this puts excess wear on the extractor since it has to slide over the back of the case? I read this on another forum so I am not sure of the validity of his comment, but would it be good practice to manually chamber the first round to minimize setback or does it really put excess strain on the extractor.
Last edited by Dragline45; November 18, 2012 at 04:42 PM. |
November 18, 2012, 04:30 PM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2012
Posts: 12
|
I'm not a gunsmith but it seems to me that the extractor is going to slide over the case anyway. And that is exactly what I do to prevent bullet set back in my 232.
|
November 18, 2012, 04:33 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
I was thinking the same thing, I don't really see how it could be a problem.
|
November 18, 2012, 04:34 PM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2008
Posts: 3,150
|
Extractors are either designed to pivot around the rim or to have the rim slide up from underneath. If you have the latter than it can be damaged or stretched out of adjustment by dropping the slide on a round. I don't know what you have but there is really no good reason to chamber a round and then drop the slide on top of it. I have simply learned from years of shooting 1911s to always load rounds from a magazine. It works on every gun. As far as setback goes, if you're seeing any STOP using that ammo and stop rechambering rounds more than once. The problem is defective ammo and there is nothing can you do as far as loading that is going to have any effect on setback. If a round sets back far enough really bad stuff can happen to you. The reason it is getting set back is because it is junk ammo - regardless of whose name is stamped on it.
Last edited by drail; November 18, 2012 at 04:39 PM. |
November 18, 2012, 04:35 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,244
|
Semi auto pistols are designed to be fed from a magazine. It does harm the extractor to plop a round in the chamber and release the slide.
__________________
"A man can be destroyed but not defeated". Ernest Hemingway Protect our 2nd Amendment Rights -- Join the NRA |
November 18, 2012, 04:46 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Correction, after close examination while slowly chambering a round from the magazine the case does indeed appear to slip up underneath the extractor. I'll try different ammunition and just switch rounds out more frequently rather than manually loading the round to prevent setback.
Quote:
Last edited by Dragline45; November 18, 2012 at 04:58 PM. |
|
November 18, 2012, 05:02 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,804
|
This is more of a problem with 1911's and internal extractors. It is probably better if rounds feed from the magazine, but with most modern guns with an external extractor I'd be less concerned.
|
November 18, 2012, 05:10 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
I am no expert on the subject so I guess I will just play it safe and not manually chamber a round, but I really don't see how it could be putting excess strain on the extractor. When I drop the round in the chamber and slowly ease the slide forward the extractor very lightly clicks over the case rim. I don't see how a steel extractor slipping over a brass rim will break it.
|
November 18, 2012, 05:12 PM | #9 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2008
Posts: 3,150
|
You need to find some way to get out of the habit of rechambering rounds. The quality control of most of the ammo being sold today IS the cause of set back problems. The manufacturer never made any guarantees about their product if you chamber it more than one time. They don't care and their lawyers have convinced tham that they are not repsonsible if you do and your barrel blows. This is a serious problem today and your only defense is to not rechamber rounds. With some loads and some calibers there is very little room for error. If you rechamber rounds you are taking a serious risk. Dragline, a rigid spring steel extractor (like a 1911) that does not pivot on a pin may snap over the rim a few times but it was never designed to do that and it will damage the extractor. It cannot flex that far without being stressed to its limit. If you have a pivoting extractor then knock yourself out. I still don't understand why anyone would want to do this.
|
November 18, 2012, 05:30 PM | #10 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Drail thanks for all the input.
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Dragline45; November 18, 2012 at 05:35 PM. |
||
November 18, 2012, 05:36 PM | #11 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 24, 2011
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 849
|
For what it worth, when I have tried to manually chamber a round on a Glock and insert a full magazine after that, I have had problems, when I put a full mag in and chamber one by racking the slide, and then removing the mag and topping it off with another round, I have had no problems.
|
November 18, 2012, 08:19 PM | #12 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
That's a pivoting extractor in the photo, but I still would not recommend hand loading the chamber routinely.
Denis |
November 18, 2012, 08:41 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2012
Posts: 1,078
|
It can cause the extractor to chip.
It isn't designed to jump over the case rim. Like many have said, it is supposed to slip up from underneath. Extractors are normally hardened to resist wear. Hardened parts can chip if they are hit wrong. Doesn't always happen, but it can. Don't rechamber rounds. Any rounds. The cost savings isn't worth the potential problems.
__________________
I am no longer participating in gun forums. Good luck. |
November 18, 2012, 08:44 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Well I found a solution, after hand chambering a round as I follow the slide home if I depress the back of the extractor so it springs out there is no contact with the case rim as it goes over it. Hassle? Yes but I would rather not have to throw out ammunition that costs about a buck a round after chambering it a couple times.
Last edited by Dragline45; November 18, 2012 at 09:04 PM. |
November 18, 2012, 08:47 PM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 24, 2011
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 849
|
Why aren't you guys just chambering a round by racking the slide? Then top off the magazine.
|
November 18, 2012, 08:57 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
Last edited by Dragline45; November 18, 2012 at 09:03 PM. |
|
November 19, 2012, 01:20 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2005
Location: midwest
Posts: 532
|
Load it from the mag.
Yes, chambering a round by hand may damage the extractor. I know of no manufacturer that recommends loading their pistol in this way. |
November 19, 2012, 01:36 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
|
I've dropped a round on the chamber of my 1911s, and let the extractor over-ride it, for decades. I've suffered exactly one extractor failure from those guns and that extractor had literally been in the gun since WWII.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice. |
November 19, 2012, 02:10 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 4, 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 149
|
Load from the magazine. I manually loaded a round in my Glock and it chipped off half of my extractor. Not expensive, but annoying anyway.
__________________
Guns don't kill people, fathers with pretty daughters do. Two wrongs don't make a right, but three comes pretty close. Proud NRA member |
November 19, 2012, 02:21 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
If you look at my earlier post I found that when hand chambering a round following the slide forward and depressing the back of the extractor as it is about to contact the case rim prevents the extractor from making any contact, thus not causing any potential damage to the extractor. My carry guns usually stays loaded for 2 weeks at a time so it's really not that much of a hassle considering i'm only doing it a couple times a month.
Quote:
Last edited by Dragline45; November 19, 2012 at 02:24 PM. |
|
November 19, 2012, 02:55 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2006
Posts: 1,066
|
You've described a normal action that happens ever time you fire a shot until the last round in the magazine. If it's bad for the extractor, the design is very flawed. If you're worried about bullet set-back, don't chamber rounds over and over again. Shoot the chambered round next range day and freshen up the bullets when you get back home.
If you're talking about dropping one in the tube and letting the slide go, it's not necessary although some guns are better suited to handled this than others. |
November 19, 2012, 04:57 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Nakanokalronin, you are incorrect in your assumption.
When the slide strips a round from the magazine, the round rises up from under the extractor and slides into place - the extractor hook does not get pushed outward around it. The extractor rides forward with the slide (and cartridge rim) as the slide goes forward. During recoil, the extractor is already in contact with the rim. So, no, forcing the extractor around the rim is not "a normal action that happens every time you fire a shot". If you search, you can probably find some cutaway demo videos of the process. |
November 19, 2012, 05:31 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2012
Location: NV
Posts: 743
|
Quote:
|
|
November 19, 2012, 05:45 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2011
Posts: 627
|
A helpful discussion. Thanks, all. After cleaning I normally (used to) hand-chamber a round, close the slide, and insert mag for +1. Now I'm thinking it's better to just discard one round per monthly-ish cleaning and never re-chamber. That way, no potential added setback or claw wear.
__________________
Shoot smart. Shoot S-Mart. |
November 19, 2012, 08:45 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2012
Posts: 1,078
|
Quote:
At the very least, they will need to be harder than the material they are moving against. Most of them are probably not through hardened just surface hardened leaving a tougher ductile core, but since they usually have very sharp edges, the edges are going to be through hardened just because they are so small in cross section. Hard materials don't like shock. Sharp corners also result in stress risers which can concentrate stress in a very small area causing a fracture. Snapping over the rim repeatedly can cause shock that it wasn't designed to handle. It might very well go for 1000's of rounds without a problem then chip the extractor and the gun starts losing control of the fired case. Some guns have very beefy extractors (without extremely sharp edges) that are designed to do this. (Shotguns, apparently the Beretta 92, push feed bolt actions)
__________________
I am no longer participating in gun forums. Good luck. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|