|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 13, 2009, 07:09 PM | #101 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,014
|
Quote:
I am not advocating inaction I am however saying that the more you do to look reasonable the better. I still don't understand why I have to keep defending what should be an uncontroversial assertion. If you are pointing a gun at someone you should have the have the manners to introduce yourself and your leetle frien' No law or policy is going to ding you for giving said BG a chance to drop his weapon. DROP YOUR GUN..Bang. |
|
April 13, 2009, 07:55 PM | #102 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,934
|
Waggonman,
The true facts of a fight, fists, boots, knives, and or guns, you get hurt if you loose, sometimes even when you win. A good demo, take your electronic timer from your shooting bag, have a single round loaded into your pistol, this is done on the range. Stand to one side of the shooter (yes behind him!) imagine the electronic beep is your cry of "Freeze" 3 yds in front of the shooter, and off to one side, an IDPA target. So watch this, beep = "Freeze" at the sound of the beep, swing and fire the shot! Less than a second, you are shot!! YOU CAN NOT GIVE VERBAL COMMANDS TO A PERSON WITH A GUN IN THEIR FIST! NO, NO! You will be shot. Remember this, you will be shot, period! And talk about trouble you will be in, till you are blue in the face, it beats being dead, or very badly injured. |
April 13, 2009, 08:02 PM | #103 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
Quote:
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
|
April 13, 2009, 08:03 PM | #104 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
|
|
April 13, 2009, 08:03 PM | #105 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
DNS,
Let's just say Ayoob got his information from some VERY good sources.
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
April 13, 2009, 09:04 PM | #106 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,014
|
Quote:
I am refering to an instance that you think it would be a good idea to communicate. For the last time I AM NOT ADVOCATING HESITATING AT THE MOMENT OF TRUTH, I AM GIVING A SUGGESTION THAT SEEMS TO BE COMMON SENSICAL. Shouldn't I be working from at least concealment if available, anyway? |
|
April 13, 2009, 09:20 PM | #107 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
Nelson Clyde III witnessed Wilson and Arroyo during the fight and didn't report Arroyo going down. http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/MYS...html20491.html Quote:
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
||
April 13, 2009, 10:29 PM | #108 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
|
Wagonman,
Quote:
Someone who is an "active shooter", by any definition, is intent on murder. He's already started shooting in some place where there are numerous people. He is likely to have already wounded or killed some number of people before you identify him as the source of the gunfire. From most of the incidents, he will continue to seek out more people to shoot them too. Thus, you have someone who is actively engaged in multiple homicides, who is very likely to continue to commit murder until stopped. Even from a position of cover, I do not elect to give warning to such a person and bet my life that he can't shoot me with a lucky shot. I will do everything I can (given the ability) to understand the situation, look for any legitimate reason he may be shooting and decide the if/when/how to shoot the killer. When it comes time to take a shot, I will not risk a "good clean shot" on giving him a command that will very likely reduce my chance of stopping the carnage. I'll take any risks in a civil court later.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately) |
|
April 13, 2009, 11:37 PM | #109 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2005
Posts: 249
|
Hey, DNS...
I've been to Tyler, viewed the shooting scene, talked to witnesses and participants. Chris Bird debriefed more of them. Did you? Or are you just going on what you heard and read on the internet? I know Ron Borsch. I've taught with him. He never said that a cop going in to one of these things alone would be in no danger. His point is that cops have sworn an oath to risk their lives if necessary to protect those they've sworn an oath to protect. Look at the young (mid-20s) officer in the South within the past few weeks who stopped the mass murder in the old folks' home when, alone as first responder and not knowing when backup would respond, he entered the scene, "rode to the sound of the guns," took a hit and stopped the killing with one shot that nailed the bad guy in the chest and dropped him. His success in short-circuiting that mass murder shows us that Ron Borsch was on to something important. DNS, you tell a fellow poster that only an idiot would take the witness stand when accused of wrongfully shooting someone? That tells me you've never been involved in an "affirmative defense," the situation where someone did indeed harm another, but did so justifiably. If the only person who knows why the shooter fired -- the shooter himself -- does NOT testify, please tell us how the triers of the facts sitting in that jury box will ever know his side of the story? |
April 14, 2009, 05:59 AM | #110 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,934
|
This is were your expert witness comes in, he or she answers the questions put by the apposing legal council, once that witness has been accredited as to having that expertise by the court.
The Jury is privy to these deliberations, and make more informed decisions because of the knowledge of these individuals, brought forth by differing points of view, with a court appointed referee (The Judge) who keeps the proceedings on track. Mr. Ayoob has been that Expert on many occasions. Last edited by Brit; April 14, 2009 at 06:22 AM. |
April 14, 2009, 10:22 AM | #111 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
I didn't say you were wrong. All I said was that I cannot verify the information in your article. Have I been to Tyler? Yep. Several times. Did I view the crime scene? Like you, after the fact. I followed the timeline from the Tyler Morning Telegraph and got an informal tour by one of the courthouse officers who was nice enough to point out where things happened. He didn't mention at that time anything about Arroyo going down and I didn't ask him. It wasn't an issue. What I was more interested in at the time were the distances involved and hence having dug up as many of the news stories that I could for getting the eyewitness descriptions. From those descriptions, I am not finding any that put Arroyo on the ground. If you could point out some sources, I would greatly appreciate it. Heck I still have family in Smith County. If you have specific witnesses that put Arroyo on the ground, there is even a remote chance my family members know or or of that person and I could get an introduction...but I would need to know who some of those witnesses are. As for believing stuff from the internet, that is where your information appearing that I read, LOL! Quote:
I certainly agree, however, the the method championed by Borsch is a good way to go. That isn't in question and I said so above.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange Last edited by Double Naught Spy; April 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM. |
||
April 14, 2009, 10:34 AM | #112 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
|
|
April 14, 2009, 10:42 AM | #113 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: East TN
Posts: 2,649
|
Maybe this is a good idea and maybe it isn't but it just popped into my head and I have to speak my mind.
How about (after doing something about these anti-CCW zones) including an Active Shooter Protocol for CCW holders in CCW classes. Here are some ideas on what might be included in this protocol: 1.) Asses and deal with the situation in your immediate area (i.e. if the shooter is near go ahead and draw your weapon and engage.) 2.) If shooter is not in your immediate vicinity call the police, verify that they are aware of the situation and then ask the dispatcher to give first responders a breif description of your apearance (i.e. I'm a CCW holder wearing a blue shirt and a whit baseball cap) 3.) HOLD YOUR POSITION, take measures to make it more defensible if possible and use your CCW only to defend yourself and those in your immediate vicinity. Good idea?
__________________
Sgt. of Marines, 5th Award Expert Rifle, 237/250 Expert Pistol, 382/400. D Co, 4th CEB, Engineers UP!! If you start a thread, be active in it. Don't leave us hanging. OEF 2011 Sangin, Afg. Molon Labe Last edited by Tucker 1371; April 14, 2009 at 10:43 AM. Reason: typo |
April 14, 2009, 02:43 PM | #114 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,014
|
Mas, I really enjoy the Proarms podcast keep up the good work,
Like a sig line I like says if it's time to go GO. All I am saying is you should have the aftermath in your thought process. If it is feasible give verbal commands if not don't. Quote:
Last edited by Wagonman; April 14, 2009 at 02:52 PM. Reason: quoting Mr Ayoob |
|
April 15, 2009, 08:22 AM | #115 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 23, 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 411
|
Quote:
|
|
April 15, 2009, 10:07 AM | #116 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
|
|
April 15, 2009, 10:11 AM | #117 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
|
|
April 15, 2009, 10:14 AM | #118 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 152
|
Quote:
|
|
April 15, 2009, 11:33 AM | #119 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
On the training issue - my thought is that if folks truly think they want to actively engage an active shooter - they need to train sufficiently on their own through courses and related activities.
The normal CCW state mandated training paradigm is about the 'law', avoiding a fight and things like that. It certainly isn't to give tactical advice, although some instructors might mention principles. I shudder to think about how a state designed tactical curriculum would evolve. Also, having such a curriculum would probably clash with those who want to ban carry at the rampage sites, like churches, malls and schools. The property rights nuts (sorry) would not like the state to teach you how to use a gun on their gosh-darn property!!
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
April 15, 2009, 11:52 AM | #120 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
So Glenn, you're saying that anything controlled by the government will be a catastrophe and no one will be happy with the implementation or the results?
What would ever give you that idea?
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
April 15, 2009, 12:59 PM | #121 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
The Bush Administration?
Forgive me - infract me!
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
April 15, 2009, 05:30 PM | #122 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,934
|
Mr Armstrong,
Quote:
A robbery here in Florida in a Drug Store, a retired Police Officer in the store, armed. Caught on video, the robber moving along counter, pistol in hand, he sees the Guard, and is swinging the gun up when a 9mm round impacts center chest, D&D. This and so many confrontations are not solved by impeccable articulation! But rather strategic application of heavy metal, traveling at speed (1250fps) or there abouts. |
|
April 15, 2009, 07:03 PM | #123 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 23, 1999
Posts: 498
|
Over the past couple of years I've seen several persons shot after failing to comply with verbal compliance directives. They were invariably reaching for a weapon or attempting to engage friendlies with a weapon already in hand.
Every one of them lost their gamble about action/reaction. I've seen several more folks who could have been justifiably killed, but were momentarily befuddled enough by aggressive verbal commands to allow them to survive the incident and be taken into custody. Tremendous restraint was exercised by trained professionals who elected not to take a life. Properly executed verbal commands are useful because they often result in compliance. A belligerant, authoritative, and concise command will often (not every time) allow you to get inside someone's OODA loop as they attempt to digest the implicit threat and weigh the odds. I've encountered an armed CCW holder racing around the site of an active shooter incident, weapon held at "High Sabrina", and looking to rescue his wife. Verbal commands precluded an ugly case of mistaken identity and saved him from being killed by responding officers. Consider a typical active shooter: He (normally male) is usually relatively untrained, normally psychopathic or enraged, at least temporarily irrational, and possibly has a death wish. He is dangerous precisely due to potential unpredictability. This person may or may not respond rationally to verbal commands. Unfortunately, while incapable of making split-second rational decisions, he may nevertheless exhibit remarkably meticulous planning combined with a dispassionate dispensation of violence. This person may stop shooting because someone politely asks them to (an outcome I was witness to). Conversely, he may think he is Zeus and attempt to smite all comers without regard for personal survival. Crazy people are...crazy. If the bad actor continues to commit multiple homicides in your presence, he becomes a legitimate target in most instances. A lot would depend upon State laws regarding a civilian's powers to interupt a violent felony in progress. Few locales require verbal warning prior to taking a shot in such a situation. I see no need to shoot unnecessarily if verbal commands are an option (i.e., your physical position, armament, abilities, or training offer you a clear momentary advantage). If not...find the largest exposed vitals of your opponent and do the best you can as quickly as you can.
__________________
Figure The Odds... Last edited by Chindo18Z; April 15, 2009 at 07:11 PM. |
April 15, 2009, 08:44 PM | #124 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,014
|
Quote:
|
|
April 15, 2009, 09:08 PM | #125 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 31, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,775
|
Well said Chindo18Z. I am not an expert on these matters nor do I claim to be one but common sense tells me that in a violent encounter with someone who wishes me or others harm, I should seek an advantage (distance, cover, concealment, using a weapon etc) as quickly as I can and never relinquish it with additional risk.
As others have said, if you choose to engage a shooting/robbing BG with your CCW, do it violently without hesitation or stay away from the attacker and protect yourself and your family if with you.
__________________
"God and the Soldier we adore, in time of trouble but not before. When the danger's past and the wrong been righted, God is forgotten and the Soldier slighted." Anonymous Soldier. |
|
|