November 1, 2016, 08:39 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2016
Location: Upstate NY.
Posts: 901
|
The 6.5 of the Future
Ok, so I need some input.
I'm looking to fill the gap between 223 and 308 and have decided I want to with one of the 6.5's. It's a big enough step up from 223 to be significant, and it's a big enough step down from 308. Sweet spot. With that said, how the heck am I supposed to choose between: 6.5x55 Swedish, 6.5 Creedmore, and 260 Remington? They're all so similar. Here are the pros and cons from what I can see: 6.5x55 Swedish Pros - been around forever (isn't a fad), everyone makes ammo for it Cons - not many rifles made in this chambering, ammo not available locally (I do reload, but having factory ammo accessible is a perk) 6.5 Creedmore Pros - tons of guns made in this chambering, most readily available ammo (of the three), can build an AR in this caliber (if I ever move to a free state) Cons - very "recent" development (meaning, will it stand the test of time?) 260 Remington Pros - can make brass from 308 cases Cons - factory ammo is expensive, limited rifle selection They all have pros and cons, so I guess my decision will boil down to choosing a cartridge that is HERE TO STAY. Which of these rounds will still be commonplace in 50 years?
__________________
In God we trust. Last edited by jackstrawIII; November 3, 2016 at 07:46 AM. |
November 1, 2016, 09:54 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Your "Cons" for the 6.5 CM doesn't hold water. Yes compared to many, its relatively a new cartridge, but its certainly not a fad.
It will be around for as long as we have cartridge rifles. Its super accurate, for both hunting, and competition. Your PRO about lots of rifles being made for it, plus competitively priced factory ammo, and reloading components will assure its long life.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
November 1, 2016, 12:38 PM | #3 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 24, 2016
Location: ny
Posts: 112
|
Who ever figured to attach creedmoor to the 6.5 should win a medal for the best advertising slogan in 50 years. how this round took off is beyond me which is 99.9999% like the 260 rem which was horribly marketed by rem so maybe that is the answer. maybe some dream about the famous match against the british where the American won it in long island. a lot is made of the good factory ammo but who shoots long distance with just factory ammo? what if the rifle does not like it? with reloading you can do a lot more shooting and tailor a load for your rifle
|
November 1, 2016, 01:08 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2014
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 728
|
I vote 6.5 Creedmore,
It is doing so well in the short few years it haw existed. I am getting a ruger american predator in 6.5 CM as soon as i have the cash saved up
__________________
Without the 2nd amendment, all other rights would not exist |
November 1, 2016, 07:59 PM | #5 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
CM will standardize the 6.5 bore like 308 for 30.
CM name is 2nd best marketing trick in cartridge naming history. First being "magnum". Last edited by johnwilliamson062; November 1, 2016 at 08:33 PM. |
November 1, 2016, 08:19 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
|
The 260 was a good idea, the 6.5 improved some shortcomings and is the 6.5 of the future. If building a custom rifle the 2 are a virtual tie, but off the shelf the 6.5 is a little better. Hand loaded the 6.5X55 is a classic that can best the other 2. The 26 Nosler is the fastest.
I 100% agree that it is the perfect fit between 223 and 308. I have those 2 and can see a 6.5 Creedmoor in my future. |
November 1, 2016, 08:24 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 908
|
There's also the 6.5 grendel and 6.5x47 Lapua, both of these little 6.5's have great potential.
If I was going for an 6.5 AR-10, the 6.5 creedmoor was made to be cheap to shoot and accurate, don't have to worry about brass getting beat up and/or lost so much. The grendel offers better ballistics than a .223 and can fit in an AR-15, I'd really like a little bolt gun in the grendel. The 6.5x47 Lapua was never meant to be the cheapest to shoot, more to be the most accurate round at 300 meters that wouldn't be hard on barrels Lapua could come up with. Plenty of energy and bullet selection to make it an adequate medium game rifle at the distances I hunt. I'd also like a relatively short lightweight bolt gun in this caliber. I'd probably just buy enough brass to last the life of the barrel with reloading. |
November 1, 2016, 08:41 PM | #8 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Quote:
6.5X47 is not going to take over the hunter/target plinker segment of the market. Have they even surrendered the patents to SAAMI? The 6.5 PCC would have potential if it was standardized through SAAMI, but it seems the owner is not interested. |
|
November 1, 2016, 10:08 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2013
Posts: 33
|
'Background Story'
6.5 Creedmoor Breaks Mold Again - Wins Shooters Over
New product introductions usually struggle. The innovation has to win over skeptical consumers, induce them to try it, and have a price that justifies switching from current brand favorites. That said, dramatic product launches that change the paradigm do happen. Look no farther than the Apple iPod or iPhone to see how breaking the mold in product development can change the rules of the game. The introduction of the 6.5 Creedmoor echoed Apple’s success in shaking up an industry. Upending Accepted Practice to Meet Consumer Needs The introduction of the 6.5 Creedmoor had really flipped the script. Dennis DeMille and Dave Emary had taken the radical step of designing a cartridge that had no gun barrel to chamber in. It met a lot of consumer needs because it addressed a very specific wish list DeMille had written, detailing exactly what competition shooters needed in a high-performance cartridge case. (Find that list here.) But it came at the problem from a fresh direction that demanded a shift in the way barrel, gun and ammunition producers worked together. Banking on a Strong Reputation Dennis and Dave had to convince a number of key industry leaders to support their new case design, but won them over. With production challenges overcome, now came the big test. Would shooters try it, and love it enough to switch or modify guns to use it? People were naturally not ready to order new barrels and give the new cartridge a trial without seeing evidence of value, so Dennis had to put his reputation on the line by using the product himself first. And he had to convince people who trusted him to put a bit of their own reputations on the line by putting the new design to the test in competition. “To start, there were only a few people like me shooting it across the course in conventional high power. People wanted to see how I did with it before committing to it. However, I have a good friend, Kent Reeve out of North Carolina who is a long-time member of the U.S. Palma Team and a phenomenal long range shooter. He took a strong interest in chambering his rifle in 6.5 Creedmoor, so I provided him with the load data. From the very first match he began crushing the competition at 600-1,000 yards. That really brought attention of this round to the long-range shooting crowd.” In short, the new cartridge delivered on its promise, which is the foundational step in launching a new product or brand. Not everyone jumped on the bandwagon immediately. There were a lot of people deeply invested in their current favorite shooting solutions, and setting those loyalties aside took time. “There were some naysayers and internet forum conversations that questioned the need for the round when so many perfectly good rounds already existed. And some folks acted as if we were demanding that they re-barrel their rifles in this new caliber, which was creating a problem that did not exist. Dave Emary warned me this would be the case; Dave was the one who came up with the .17 HMR, so he was very familiar with that particular breed of online stone-thrower!” The next surprise, which was definitely unexpected, was the way the 6.5 Creedmoor was adopted as a hunting round. Ruger helped by putting out a hunting rifle with a barrel ready to chamber it. And, again, Dave’s design did what it promised: held its power and elevation over distance. Where you aim is where it goes, and quickly, which is what you need when the target is moving! Ruger came first, but a lot of smaller custom guys picked it up fairly quickly as well. Savage was the second big company to pick it up several years later. “After they did it was pretty much off to the races,” said DeMille. And finally, the press caught on quickly, too. “The gun press became the cartridge’s biggest advocates surprisingly quickly, as contributors put the cartridge to the test and submitted positive reports. This was news: Flipping the script, performing as advertised, and so forth. So, they loved it from the get go and were quite prolific in writing about it. “By the end of the first year it had begun to take on a life of its own. Hornady and Creedmoor had also done what we promised and made sure components were readily available. I have long since lost track of who makes what rifle in that cartridge now…still fun to watch it gain in popularity though, having been there since its inception!” |
November 1, 2016, 10:38 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: May 22, 2014
Posts: 88
|
I also needed something between the .223 and 308/30-06/30-30 and went with the 6.5 Creedmoor caliber and a Savage model 12 LRP for target shooting,in short I'm a happy camper .
__________________
Sentences and paragraphs with punctuations are over rated as long as you get your point or view across. |
November 1, 2016, 11:50 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
to clarify, the 6.5 creedmore and 260 can both be had in AR10s, which are quite a bit heavier and larger than the AR15s that everybody and their dogs are in love with.
there is also the 6.5 Grendel which also a very recent addition but is picking up speed fast. not a lot of rifles are still available in 6.5g but now that Wolf is making affordable ammo for it, a person could just about shoot 6.5 grendel for dang near the same price as 223 for practice, and still benefit from the added stopped power of the more expensive stuff when you hope you don't need it. there are also the 6.5x50 Japanese, 6.5x52 Mannlicher Carcano, and 6.5x54 mannlicher schoenaur which did not withstand the test of time, have no modern rifles chambered in them, and which ammo is only manufactured in batches by a couple companies about once a year. I really love the 6.5mm. I've taken blackbear with the 6.5 japanese, and elk and deer with the 6.5 grendel and am loaded up for the 6.5 swede for hunting but really have only really shot it in vimbar competitions. based on your criteria of wanting an intermediate between the three, I would say the 6.5 creedmore. it has become an overnight success and will not likely die any time soon. if it does fail the test of time, it will be 5 to 10 years down the line. the 260 rem is already on its way to the graveyard thanks to more efficient cartridges like the 6.5 creedmore. 6.5 swede will probably take another 50 years to die, if not more, but if nobody in your area has it, then they don't have it. personally, what I did was bought 800 rounds of swedish blanks, pulled the wood bullets, dumped the powder, and ended up with a lifetime supply of brass that I don't have to worry about scrounging around in the grass after word, and can load whatever I want into... I have loaded everything from 120gr prvi hollow points to 160gr hornady round noses, some of which was loaded for as little as .25 per round... that's an awful lot of cheap shooting for a bolt action.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
November 2, 2016, 02:21 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
|
The 6.5x55 is great if you want to get a Tikka or CZ.
The 6.5 CM is great if you want a Ruger or Savage. So if you plan on buying a European rifle, get the Swede, if an American rifle, get the Creedmoor. Handloading considerations make all three comparable in price and performance, but my personal choice would be the Creedmoor. Jimro
__________________
Machine guns are awesome until you have to carry one. |
November 2, 2016, 04:11 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
|
I have always been a fan of the 6.5 family, but what about a 7MM? 7MM-08?
|
November 2, 2016, 05:45 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2016
Location: Upstate NY.
Posts: 901
|
Gunplummer,
The 7mms are very intriguing, but they're more of a 1/2 step down from 308. I know it's all subjective and we're splitting hairs to some extent, but I think I've decided that 6.5 is more "in the middle" of the 223 and 308, which is what I'm looking for. Regarding guns, I'm an unashamed CZ fanboy. I love them. The gun that got me thinking about the 6.5 is the CZ 550FS in 6.5x55. It has such vintage charm and I love the idea of shooting a classic cartridge out of a "classic looking" gun. The only catch is, if I want to get another gun in that caliber down the road, my options are severely limited. I try to limit the number of cartridges that I have, and there just aren't that many 6.5x55's out there that appeal to me.
__________________
In God we trust. |
November 2, 2016, 06:56 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,652
|
I built AR's in both Creedmoor and 260--just to see if there really is a difference between them There is--but mostly if you reload IMO. I would say both calibers favor the reloader--but the Creedmoor, in my humble unexpert opinion, has the edge over the 260 by virtue of it's set-back shoulder which allows the use of a greater variety of high BC bullets seated long while not taking up as much case capacity--the same difference between the grendel and something like a 6.5 x 45. However--again, like the grendel--that long high secant ogive can occasionally be problematic finding it's way upstream from magazine to the chamber in a semi-auto, and the designs based on a simply neck up or down of an existing design--like the 260--seems to feed more easily and reliably.
Either one shoots very well--but the Creedmoor is truly a cartridge of beauty and tunable to laser accuracy if you reload. My first shots with my Creedmoor build were with Hornady's factory GMX--more of a hunting load than target--and it delivered sub-MOA the first time out.My next go with Berger's phenomenal VLD's did not go very well but I eventually tuned that issue away. Swift Scirroco's also yield very accurate loads in my Creedmoor.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! Last edited by stagpanther; November 2, 2016 at 07:01 AM. |
November 3, 2016, 05:45 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Manatee County, Florida
Posts: 1,974
|
If you find .308 recoil to be bothersome, I suggest buying Managed Recoil hunting ammo by Remington or Hornady.
Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release. |
November 3, 2016, 06:25 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2016
Location: Upstate NY.
Posts: 901
|
Jack, I love shooting my 308s!! I'm just looking to expand my collection and am intrigued by the 6.5s. Just can't seem to choose which one.
At this point, I'm leaning towards the Swede.
__________________
In God we trust. |
November 3, 2016, 06:56 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2015
Location: new england
Posts: 1,159
|
MY take on this is the 6.5 creedmore is the best choice (of those) for bench shooting or any long range sport. Long range heavy rifle with a big scope and bipod. Is this what you want? Seems a clear choice for the sport. You say shooting not hunting, this is clearly way to go. Unless I miss something in your question? It is not just the round, it is the available and suitable rifles.
The 260 is best suited for hunting, based on ammo selection and twist rates most often seen factory rifles. This is pretty new, but excellent. I like 7mm-08 in this space. But, I also like the 260 design and performance. if I wanted a deer rifle, I would choose between 7mm-08 and 260 based on the gun not the round. That would be either a 260 or 7mm-08. It is not just about filling a gap. It is about filling a need for light weight deer rifle. The 6.5 sweed is a great nostalgic round available in specific guns that either you want that gun or forget. such as Swedish Mausers or cz. I might get one some day, maybe?? If you have to ask, you dont want this. Same as 7x57. You dont just decide to buy a 7x57, but; you see a great old classic rifle and it happens to be a 6.5x55 or 7x57. Both are a very useful old caliber. Last edited by fourbore; November 3, 2016 at 08:14 AM. |
November 3, 2016, 07:29 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 4,556
|
Quote:
"Blackout" "Whisper" This is an extremely competitive arena where ballistic charts matter little. As stated, the .260 Rem has been around for ages, yet Rem made very few offerings in that chambering. It wasn't until the hobby of long-range shooting became more popular that "wildcat" style chamberings began to become the standard. Practically speaking, flip a coin between the .260 and the 6.5 Creedmore- and the Swede isn't much different either. You didn't mention your application, or if you handload- I'm assuming you don't, because you didn't get into the 6mm wildcats like the 6mm Creedmore- which has become much more popular than the 6.5 in competition. Do a search here, pro's, con's and other has been discussed many times.
__________________
Remington 700/Savage Rebarreling /Action Blueprinting 07 FFL /Mosin-Nagant Custom Shop/Bent Bolts Genuine Cerakote Applicator www.biggorillagunworks.com |
|
November 3, 2016, 07:45 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,652
|
That all may be true--but I would still get the Creedmoor of the choices mentioned. LOL
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
November 3, 2016, 07:59 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,483
|
The 6.5 Creedmoor seems well enough established to go with. If supplies get short, your barrel will probably be worn out by then anyhow and you can put on Something Else.
6.5x55 calls for a long action, ammo and data are based on 1940 Swedish GI. Commonly overloaded in "strong modern rifles" but I don't know a source of PV tested +P data. .260 Remington is a good hunting round/rifle, a friend has one. Target shooters were getting about a 60% yield in brass prep of RP cases. Lapua now makes cases but seems too little, too late. 6.5x47 Lapua seems to have been overtaken by the Creedmoor. I saw a 6x6.5 Lap before I ever saw a rifle for the original. |
November 3, 2016, 08:50 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2007
Location: texas
Posts: 997
|
Another issue with the good ole swede, is that rifles so chambered may have a very long leade to the rifling to accommodate 6.5 x 55 cartridges loaded with the 160gr. roundnose bullets. My brother had a Win Featherweight with that issue. A Cerosafe chamber casting revealed why his accuracy with lighter spitzers weren't up to par.
The Creedmoor doesn't have any such issues. The case design makes it very flexible to load with a variety of bullet weights. |
November 3, 2016, 11:13 AM | #23 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 24, 2016
Location: ny
Posts: 112
|
A writer for outdoor life jim Carmichael I think first made a 260 rem round brought it to a 1000 yd match and placed very high against fire breathing magnums. the idiots from Remington were there and saw fit to adopt then destroy the round. why they morphed into a strictly hunting round after seeing what it did at 1000 yds is insane. if they worked for the govt they would have been promoted. I would stick with the 260 being there are so much brass in 308 7mm etc
|
November 3, 2016, 05:11 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,832
|
Of course, you could be different, and go for a 6.5x68. 75 years old and still near top of the class.
__________________
I used to love being able to hit hard at 1000 yards. As I get older I find hitting a mini ram at 200 yards with the 22 oddly more satisfying. |
November 3, 2016, 05:46 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: January 31, 2016
Posts: 48
|
I vote 6.5 CM! I'm working on adding that to my hunting and/or precision arsenal next.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk |
Tags |
260 remington , 6.5 creedmoor , 6.5x55 swedish , advice , caliber comparison |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|