|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 23, 2013, 11:12 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Posts: 369
|
What's your guess for the future of the .308/7.62x51nato?
Just curious and I know any answers will be purely speculation but nonetheless, how much longer do you believe that the 7.62x51 Nato will be a standard issue service cartridge? Do you think it will last longer than the 5.56?
|
October 23, 2013, 11:27 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
|
It is not the standard issue service cartridge now for rifles, but only machineguns.
The Standard rifle cartridge is the 5.45 NATO, and the 7.62 NATO is the secondary cartridge for rifles, and the standard for machineguns within NATO. Nevertheless, it's going to be around for a VERY long time. |
October 23, 2013, 11:53 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2008
Location: GA
Posts: 1,149
|
The hopelessly outdated .50 BMG is still alive and kicking and I think .308 will be around for a very long time as well.
__________________
Mauser Werke, Schmidt-Rubin, Colt, Walther, HK, Weatherby, Sig Sauer, Browning, Ruger, Beretta, etc, etc....a few friends of mine |
October 24, 2013, 01:05 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,289
|
Well, the military is still using *LOTS* of it (7.62x51) and stockpiling it and there doesn't even seem to be as much debate about it as the 5.56 so I can easily see it being around longer than the 5.56 and I think they will both be around a long, long time.
And since this is the internet and I can make any goofy prediction I want with almost no hard evidence to back up my opinion I'll define a long, long time as at least 25 years. (But I also told somebody in 1980 to go ahead and buy an expensive phonograph because I couldn't see vinyl records being replaced any time soon.) |
October 24, 2013, 01:45 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Quote:
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
|
October 24, 2013, 07:19 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
WTH is "5.45 NATO"
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
October 24, 2013, 01:19 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2001
Posts: 1,552
|
5.56 NATO (I think you meant to say?)
7.62 NATO will hang around for awhile yet.
__________________
A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington, January 8, 1790, First State of the Union Address |
October 24, 2013, 02:38 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 26, 2010
Location: Yellowstone Co, MT
Posts: 489
|
I wonder how many 308/7.62NATO rifles are in the hands of just American consumers? Has to be millions.
As long as their are owner/reloaders it will live. I don't doubt that 100 years from now there will be people asking if 308 is obsolete. It will still be as viable as it is today,IMO. |
October 24, 2013, 08:09 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Central Louisiana
Posts: 3,137
|
I came late to the .308 as a sporting cartridge because I shot up so much of it during my military years (1973-1999). I was a tanker, as in M60A1/M60A3/M1A1 and each of those tanks had a couple of 7.62 machine guns. We counted those rounds in belts, not individual cartridges and I'd suspect that over my career I fired several tons of linked 7.62 through my machine guns. It's a great light machine gun cartridge. Easily transported, the guns run fairly good, and it's lethal out to the end of its ballistic range. We got tracer burnout at about 800 meters and as long as we could see the tracers we knew that the bullets were having good effect.
But, because I fired so damned much of it in my career I came late to it as a sporting cartridge. I wanted to play with some of the others, like the .243, or the .30-06, or the .25-06 (which is a hell of a cartridge in it's own right). But, the .308, I never could feel much love for. It was like kissing your sister. Affection, yeah, but no passion. Until I stumbled into a smoking-hot deal on a pawnshop .308. I bought dies and bullets and started tinkering with it on a one cartridge basis. Imagine, shooting single cartridges, and not running it by the belt? It's accurate, good power, doesn't beat you up with recoil. Did I mention accurate? Now I've got four .308 rifles and it's one of my go-to cartridges for the deer woods. Our season starts Saturday, and I'll be packing a Savage 11 in .308. Nothing special, just a deer rifle. Quote:
But, to answer your question, the 7.62/.308 ain't going away. It fulfills a readily identified need for combat troops. It's one hell of a light machine gun cartridge and beloved of many countries. |
|
October 24, 2013, 09:22 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
|
Oops
Yes, I meant 5.56 NATO 5.45 is the Russian round (I was taking to a friend that afternoon about him getting some 5.45 ammo and I guess it was "stuck" in my mind. |
October 24, 2013, 09:24 PM | #11 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 19, 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 578
|
its not going ANYWHERE.
Dont you remember all of those 7.62 rifles being pulled out for reissue to troops during the peace keeping phase in our current pakistani/afghani areas of operation? Dont you remember the big too doo over how the uk was designing their next battle rifle as a select fire 7.62 because they wanted more knock down power. |
October 24, 2013, 09:38 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,273
|
long
It will be around longer than we will.
|
October 24, 2013, 09:39 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
|
|
October 25, 2013, 08:56 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
I think the 308/7.62 will go the way of the 30'06,
Meaning it wont go anywhere, it will be around a long time. Long after my grandkids and their grandkids are in their graves.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
October 25, 2013, 11:22 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2012
Posts: 304
|
The 7.62 won't be going anywhere until advances in body armor render it ineffective against infantry, I am talking next gen Dragonskin stuff. I figure at leased 40 years before that becomes commonplace. It is what comes after the 7.62x51 that interests me. You need major compromises to defeat armor of that caliber, either very high speeds with very high SD/hard bullets to penetrate or larger caliber heavy bullets to deliver blunt force trauma without having to penetrate the armor.
7.62x51s do deliver enough blunt force trauma to break ribs and damage organs through hardened body armor, but not enough for reliable stopping from what I have seen. |
October 25, 2013, 12:20 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
|
As a military round its days are numbered, if not already over, just as the 30-06 is no longer used. As a hunting/target round it has a bright future, just as the 30-06 did. The 308 and M-14 as a general issue military combo was a failed experiment. The 308 and M-14 had one of the shortest life spans of any military combination. The 5.56 and M-16 family is one of the longest running, most tested and proven combinations in history. It will be the battle rifle for at least another generation or 2.
The 308 hung on as a sniper round and in extremely rare cases for designated marksmen. But even in that role is being phased out in favor of the 300 Win mag. As a general purpose military round it offers very little over a 5.56 with all of the disadvantages of the older 30-06. |
October 26, 2013, 12:04 AM | #17 | |
Junior member
Join Date: September 8, 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 2,119
|
It's a proven caliber with no CLEAR superior in the same size/weight class. Sure there may be marginally better performers... but to justify the cost and effort to change, you would need to have vastly superior ballistics.
There are dozens of cartridges that have made a run at unseating the .308. Given that nearly every significant battle rifle and sniper rifle is chambered in .308, and hunting rifles too, there must be hundreds of millions worldwide. FAL, G3, PTR91, AR10, M240, M60 (still in limited use), M1A, and scores of sniper and hunting rifles in the offering. Quote:
It makes no sense to drop the .308. (I would love to hear why the super effective anti-aircraft, anti-vehicle, and anti-personnel .50 BMG is outdated!) |
|
October 26, 2013, 07:50 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2008
Location: GA
Posts: 1,149
|
Quote:
__________________
Mauser Werke, Schmidt-Rubin, Colt, Walther, HK, Weatherby, Sig Sauer, Browning, Ruger, Beretta, etc, etc....a few friends of mine |
|
October 26, 2013, 10:16 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
While I think the 7.62NATO round will be phased out in this decade, there will be rounds developed to replicate 7.62NATO ballistics in M16/M4-sized packages.....getting the best of both worlds.
Likewise, I have a turntable that allows me to convert my LP's to MP3's....again, the best of both worlds. Ain't technology grand?.....
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0...... |
October 26, 2013, 11:14 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2012
Posts: 304
|
Why is the 7.62 getting phased out? What exactly are they going to replace it with? Not more 5.56s! The 7.62 is so much more versatile out of a machine gun, not to mention much more effective range in sniper rifles.
|
October 27, 2013, 06:02 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2000
Posts: 1,082
|
Seems to be the king of the general purpose machinegun.
Reissueing M14s/M21s and reviving the "designated marksmen" concept in Afghanistan gave it a bigger lease on life. Even if it is a "secondary" cartridge, it will around a long time. |
October 27, 2013, 06:21 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
my guess is that nothing lasts forever.
deal with it.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
October 27, 2013, 11:02 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
|
I don't see anything replacing it in the GPMG role anytime soon.
For sniper/DMR applications, it is going to be the baseline for comparison, but I think it's got a lot of competition. There are flatter shooting/harder hitting rounds out there for that application. |
October 28, 2013, 10:46 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2013
Location: Albany Park, Chicago
Posts: 776
|
I think it will be around until new propellants are developed that can provide the same velocities in shorter cases, because that will mean more ammo for the same weight.
|
October 28, 2013, 02:03 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 52
|
"The .300 WM is too close to the .50 BMG."
LeadCouncil, how is the .300 win mag close to a .50 bmg? These two rounds are as different as the .22lr to the .308 in question with this forum. Last edited by Brian Pfleuger; October 29, 2013 at 03:38 PM. Reason: Intentionally antagonizing |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|