|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 25, 2011, 05:23 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 22, 2011
Posts: 10
|
Repeal the Hughes Amendment
Ever since Willian J. Hughes snuck his dirty awful amendment in with the 1986 FOPA class 3/NFA been thrown into the gutter. This law goes against the ssecond amendment because it forbids an entire class of firearms. We must overturn/repeal this law and open the machinegun registry once again. Of course writing/calling your representatives is very important but we really need to support the only organization out there trying to do anything about it. As of now they are not yet officially an organization, only a page on facebook, but they are currently in the process of becoming o non-profit organization, and we must do whatever we can to help and support this organization to help them achieve their goal of repealing the Hughes Amendment. So join the "Repeal the Hughes Amendment" page on facebook today.
|
July 25, 2011, 05:27 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Can you tell us what your exact plans are to do so? What legislation and/or litigation are you planning to pursue, and in what venues?
By all means, if you've got an argument or method that hasn't been considered by thousands of folks before, please let us know.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
July 25, 2011, 05:44 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 5, 2000
Location: AoW Land, USA
Posts: 1,968
|
How would submitting a Form 1 to create a New Machine Gun,such as a M4 (along with the tax of course) then sue based on the fact that the amendment was defeated in a vote, yet illegally made law? I am sure there are many other rulings that would be in favor of over turning the ban
|
July 25, 2011, 06:05 PM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 22, 2011
Posts: 10
|
Why not just slip the repeal in as an amendment to some other law, the same way the Hughes amendment passed in the first place
|
July 25, 2011, 06:50 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
Quote:
|
|
July 25, 2011, 08:46 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2010
Location: Hopewell Junction, NY
Posts: 454
|
If you all would vote me into office, I would make that my only goal. Since I dont want to be a politician anyway, I wouldnt mind not being voted in again!!
-George |
July 25, 2011, 09:40 PM | #7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 22, 2011
Posts: 10
|
That's actually the exact type of thing we need. Someone to get into office and sneak the repeal in and maybe change the import laws as well. They'll of probably be voted out of office because bloomberg and the Brady bunch will surely release ads trying to convince the public to do so, but we will have our freedoms restored by that time anyway.
|
July 25, 2011, 10:05 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2000
Posts: 1,210
|
Sell it as a revenue-enhancing measure. Essentially a voluntary tax increase.
Should fly well in this economic client. |
July 26, 2011, 12:25 AM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
What evidence is there that an attempt to repeal the Hughes amendment is in any way politically viable? Has anyone of any stature in Congress indicated any interest in spearheading, or even actively supporting, such a venture?
But personally, I have to say that while we still have egregious laws in Maryland, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Illinois and California that significantly impair an ordinary, honest person's ability to effectively defend himself and family, opening the machine gun registry is a lower priority for me. |
July 26, 2011, 12:54 AM | #10 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Quote:
Bringing machine guns into the equation right now would be disastrous. It would give the Brady Campaign rhetorical ammunition, and it would alienate a significant number of allies. Facebook pages and blog posts don't get stuff done. That takes money, tact, and clout. The organizations who do have those qualities aren't touching the Hughes amendment for now, and for good reason.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
July 26, 2011, 01:01 AM | #11 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
|
|
July 26, 2011, 07:09 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2000
Posts: 1,210
|
Has anyone put together a piece of sample legislation that could be presented to a representative?
|
July 26, 2011, 02:58 PM | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 22, 2011
Posts: 10
|
Don't think so, but like I said they ARE just a facebook page but the owner is working on becoming a nonprofit organization. He says they also plan to lobby the NRA and GOA. And if it DOES become an organization that will be their number 1 goal
|
July 26, 2011, 03:11 PM | #14 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Quote:
I don't know this guy thinks he can do that they can't. And if he's going to be taking people's money, he really needs to have a novel and solid strategy.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
July 26, 2011, 07:34 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Personally, I'd like to see the 1934 NFA act repealed or (preferably) ruled unconstitutional. Then the Hughes Amendment becomes moot.
|
July 27, 2011, 02:43 PM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
|
The real world problems with bringing up the issue of legal private machinegun ownership are many. First, is the public perception of machineguns as things only govt agents, the military, and lawbreakers have. And with over 70 years of brainwashing by the entertainment media that's not going to change.
Second, bringing the issue into the public eye in today's "safety concious" social environment is horribly risky. Many folks are working hard to rid us of the scourge of SEMI automatic weapons, think how popular the idea of FULL Automatic would be. It is extremely doubtful that we could win any improvement in the current laws. Note that even in the Heller decision, the court did not say we have any right to full autos, using language about "in common usage" which full autos are assuredly not. The benefits do not come close to justifying the risks. As for a revenue raising measure? Consider that the one tax the govt has never bothered to raise is the NFA tax. It was $200 in 1934, and is still $200 today. Would it gain us to see the registry reopened (the absolute best you could reasonably hope for) if they decided to raise the tax to say...$10,000? Raising the NFA tax to $10K for each transfer would certainly be a revenue raising measure for the govt. And with the registry reopened, the price of NFA weapons would go down (because the supply was no longer fixed), but with a huge increase in the NFA tax, we would see no price break for the buyers, rather an increase, effectively pricing them out of reach of everyone who isn't tremendously wealthy. And it would pass constitutional muster, in the sense that the law no longer "bans" a whole class of firearm. Making it hugely expensive isn't a legal "ban" even though it is a de facto practical one. Yes, it would be nice to be able to return to the standards (and costs) of yesteryear, but it ain't gonna happen, even including everyone in the nation who ever wanted to own a machinegun, the numbers are just too small, and that "special interest group" will get absolutely no sympathy from the press, or the general public. The most likely outcome of bringing up the issue is enhanced regulations and increased costs. Neither of which does any of us any good at all. Rather the opposite, in fact.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
July 27, 2011, 09:00 PM | #17 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Quote:
Yes, a tax on a civil right is unconstitutional. However, this isn't the time to go challenging it, especially when we've no idea how bad the blowback could be.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
July 28, 2011, 10:00 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Ain't gonna happen in real time. By the time it does, we will be carrying ray guns and debating whether you should carry a Glock phaser or 1911.
No new organization is going to come up with something except your money in their pocket.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
September 12, 2011, 11:14 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2000
Posts: 1,210
|
Finally found some time to write something up. Thoughts? Anyone know a legislator they could pass this to?
Quote:
|
|
September 13, 2011, 01:59 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
|
The problem is that it will come up, sooner or later.
And when it does, at the very least, it will be fixed. More realistically, it will focus the spotlight on NFA weapons law, which achieves the opposite effect of trying to disguise the changes in the first place. |
September 13, 2011, 07:32 AM | #21 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2011
Posts: 1
|
Repeal the Hughes Amendment
Perhaps that could be attached to the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Bill, in the House right now, H.R. 822.
|
September 13, 2011, 09:02 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Sunny Southern Idaho
Posts: 1,909
|
Seems to me that would be the quickest way to be sure that HR822 wouldn't pass.
I have no problem with such a measure, but I'm a pragmatic guy.
__________________
Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae |
September 13, 2011, 10:22 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
I agree with 44 AMP and Tom Servo. This issue is the third rail of American gun politics. It would be nearly impossible for a Hughes repeal to pass unnoticed. HR822 is under a microscope; the only conceivable avenue would be to bury it in a huge omnibus bill, and even if that were done, it would probably have to be sponsored by someone willing to sacrifice their electoral career to it. Honestly, I think the best hope for a Hughes "repeal" is to somehow neuter it in the courts first, thereby forcing Congress to act. Frankly, I don't see it happening anytime in the near future.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
March 25, 2012, 10:16 PM | #24 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2012
Posts: 3
|
New Petition
My friends and I have created a new petition for repealing the amendment. I know I'm reviving an old thread, but I am trying to spread the word. I plan to leave the petition up until after the election to gather as many signatures as possible hoping the political winds shift our way this November. I know its a long shot. I'm asking for your signatures and to share it everywhere you can, book of faces, word of mouth, other forums, email, etc.
http://www.change.org/petitions/unit...-fopa-nfa-1986 Thanks - Dave |
March 25, 2012, 10:23 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: March 23, 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 56
|
Well, I know I'm going to get slammed for this addition to the thread, but so be it.
In my opinion, second amendment provides, in line with the times in which it was written, to allow the individual to bear arms. I do not believe that any of the founding fathers thought for a moment that it should be okay to possess a fully automatic machine gun privately. I also believe the right to bear arms was enacted for personal protection and hunting purposes, as the lifestyle back then would demand.
__________________
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche |
Tags |
ban , class 3 , full auto , hughes amendment , machinegun |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|